This article links the concept of crowdthinking from the perspective of graphic design and its interface with other disciplines in the development of the Argentine export sector. How do the symbolic, functional, and economic aspects influence in the added value of the product? And how does the interaction between disciplines generate this added value from a crowdthinking perspective? How did graphic design develop from its productive methodologies? The work aims to critically theorize on current interfaces and links between disciplines in Argentine companies to develop communication from cross-border products, focusing on the different actors involved, production processes, and work methods.
JulierG.La cultura del diseño. Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili, 2010, pp. 28–31.
2.
ScolariC.Hipermediaciones: elementos para una teoria de la comunicación digital interactiva. Barcelona: Ed. Gedisa, 2008, pp. 60–65.
3.
AriasFBelacínMCejasCet al. PyME+Diseño, Segunda Encuesta. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro Metropolitano de Diseño (CMD), Observatorio de Industrias Creativas (OIC), Fundación Observatorio PyME (FOP), 2013, pp. 33–89.
4.
PevsnerN.Pioneros del diseño moderno. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ed. Infinito, 1958, pp. 21–37.
5.
ScrivenM.The concept of a transdiscipline: and of evaluation as a transdiscipline. J Multidiscip Eval2008; 5(10): 65–66.
CarusoPFeinsilberS.Formas locales para el comercio internacional (SIGRADI 2012, Forma In-Forma). Fortaleza: XVI Congreso de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital, 2012, pp. 534, 537.
10.
FerrerA.La economía argentina en el siglo XXI. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Capital Intelectual, 2015.
11.
ManziniE.Cuando todos diseñan. Madrid: Ed. Experimenta Theoría, 2015.
12.
AriasFBelacínMCejasCet al. PyME + Diseño, Segunda Encuesta. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro Metropolitano de Diseño (CMD),Observatorio de Industrias Creativas (OIC), Fundación Observatorio PyME (FOP), 2013, p. 14.
