This article applies system theory to the analysis of the relationship between the EU and candidate country Serbia, with a focus on adult education policy. The study explores how the peripheral status of Serbia with its hybrid political regime combining autocratic and democratic features leads to the hybridisation of its adult education system, and how the EU’s policies, institutions, and funding mechanisms shape this relationship. The study draws on system theory and the results of our recent study of EU support for adult education in Serbia and applies qualitative content analysis to EU and Serbian adult education policy documents, to examine the consequences of interactions between system components on Serbian adult education policy. It posits that EU’s norm-setting on one side and the allocation of funding and control mechanisms on the other facilitate the neo-colonial position of Serbia as the periphery and perpetuate a power dynamic that allows hybrid regimes to flourish and prioritise their own interests over those of their citizens or civil society. The study further opens up the possibility that these dynamics may produce ‘glitches’ in the system and corruption of the system as a whole, and invites further research and theorisation that would illuminate similar patterns and relationships across other European (national) subsystems.
AlbertM. (2002). Governance and democracy in European systems: On systems theory and European integration. Review of International Studies, 28(2), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210502002930
BenassoS.BouilletD.NevesT.do AmaraM. P. (Eds.), (2022). Landscapes of lifelong learning policies across Europe: Comparative case studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
BieberF. (2018a). The rise (and fall) of Balkan stabilitocracies. Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 10, 176–185.
7.
BlagojevićM. (2009). Knowledge production at the semiperiphery: A gender perspective. Institut za Kriminološka i Sociološka Istraživanja.
8.
BörzelT. A.SoyaltinD. (2012). Europeanization in Turkey: Stretching a concept to its limits?KFG working paper series 36. Freie Universität Berlin.
9.
BoyadjievaP.MilenkovaV.GornevG.PetkovaK.NenkovaD. (2013). The lifelong learning hybrid: The case of Bulgaria. In Lifelong learning in Europe (pp. 304–326). Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.
CEU. (2021). Council Resolution on a new European agenda for adult learning 2021–2030. Council of European Union. 2021/C 504/02. Official Journal of the European Union. 504/9.
ColeA.PasquierR. (2012). The impact of European integration on centre/periphery relations: A comparison France/United-Kingdom. Politique européenne, 36(1), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.036.0160
DespotovićM.PopovićK. (2014). Strategije obrazovanja odraslih – želje, potrebe, mogućnosti i rezultati. In KnežićB.PejatovićA.MiloševićZ. (Eds.), Modeli procenjivanja i strategije unapređivanja kvaliteta obrazovanja odraslih u Srbiji (pp. 47–68). IPA, Filozofski Fakultet.
15.
DjerasimovićS. (2015). Formation of the civic education policy as a discursive project in post-2000 Serbia. DPhil Thesis. University of Oxford.
16.
DjerasimovićS.MaksimovićM. (2017). Becoming European. Serbian adult education policy discourse through the decades. In KoulaouzidesA. G.PopovićK. (Eds.), Adult education and lifelong learning in southeastern Europe. A critical view of policy and practice (pp. 115–130). Sense Publisher.
17.
DolowitzD. P.MarshD. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
18.
EastonD. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008920
19.
EastonD. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
European Integration Office. (2011). Ten years of development assistance to the Republic of SerbiaDelevicM. (Ed.). Republic of Serbia. Government, European Integration Office.
HixS. (2005). The political system of the European union. Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
HolzingerK.KnillC.SommererT. (2008). Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization, 62(4), 553–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830808020x
31.
House of Lords. (2018). The UK and the future of the Western Balkans (1st report of Session 2017–19). House of Lords Select Committee on International Relations.
32.
JakobiA. (2009). International organizations and lifelong learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
JankovićS. (2021). A stronger sense of place is possible? Anthropocene, non-relationality and chiasms. SAJ - Serbian Architectural Journal, 13(3), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.5937/saj2103149j
34.
JovanovićA. (2020). Ideological clash between Europe's hybrid regimes and the EU. Institute of European Democrats. Brussels: EP.
35.
KnillC. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161332
36.
KopeckyM. (2014). Transnationalization of Czech adult education policy as glocalization of the world and European policy mainstream(s). European Education, 46(4), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2014.995534
37.
KozovićA. (2022). The role of the European Union in the promotion of Western Balkan “stabilitocracies:” case study of Serbia. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. OpenSIUC. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/1022/
38.
KühnhardtL. (2020). Europäische Union – Raumbegriff und Grenzbewusstsein. In BeckerP.LippertB. (Eds.), Handbuch Europäische union (pp. 289–303). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17409-5_45
39.
LindbergL. N.ScheingoldS. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community (pp. vi, 314). Prentice-Hall.
40.
MaksimovićM. (2011). Lifelong learning policy in Europe: EU, Scotland, Denmark and Serbia. Andragoške studije, (1), 47–70.
41.
MilanaM.KlattG. (2019). Governing adult education policy development in Europe. In McGrathS.MulderM.PapierJ.SuartR. (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_100
42.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2022). Political relations between Serbia and the EU. The Ministry for foreign Affairs of the Republic of Serbia. https://www.mfa.gov.rs/
43.
OSCE. (2023). Voters had political alternatives in Serbia’s elections but they were marred by overwhelming ruling party advantage, international observers say. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, OSCE Parliamentary Assembly. Press release. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/serbia/560698
PăunN. (2014). Introduction. In LothW.PăunN. (Eds.), Disintegration and integration in East-Central Europe. 1919 – post-1989. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
47.
PetakZ.KotarskiK. (Eds.), (2019). Policy-making at the European periphery: The case of Croatia. New perspectives on South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
PopovićK. (2014). Evropska i globalna politika obrazovanja odraslih – koncepti, paradigme i pristupi. IPA, Filozofski fakultet, Društvo za obrazovanje odraslih.
49.
PopovićK.MaksimovićM. (2024 forthcoming). Hybrid political regimes and adult education – the example of Serbia. In MilanaM.RasmussenP.BussiM. (Eds.), Research handbook on adult education policy (pp. unknown). Edward Elgar.
50.
RataD. (2024). EU’s diplomacy raising new stabilitocracies in the Western Balkans. Latvija Intereses Eiropas Savieniba, 1, 76–84.
51.
SamolovčevB.ZvonarevićM.TonkovićS.BogdanovićN.VelčićV.SavićevićD.JelićD.BertonceljI.PongracS.FilipovićD.ProdanovićT.OgrizovićM. (1966). Osnovi andragogije. Jugoslovenski zavod za udžbenike.
