The role of locus of control in mediating the relationship between nontraditional factors and academic entitlement

Abstract

The current study further explored the relationship between nontraditional students and academic entitlement. Previous research has established that the presence of more nontraditional factors predicts lower levels of reported academic entitlement. The mechanisms responsible for this connection have not been explored though. The current study examined the impact of locus of control on the relationship between nontraditional factors and academic entitlement. Participants (N = 332) were asked to report their status on seven nontraditional factors and then completed measures exploring locus of control, academic entitlement, work engagement, and academic motivation. Analyses revealed that nontraditional factors predicted lower levels of external locus of control and external locus of control was negatively correlated with academic entitlement. Evidence for partial mediation was found for this relationship. The impact of these findings on nontraditional students, retention, and academic interventions is discussed.

Keywords

nontraditional factors academic entitlement locus of control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

S. I.

(1973). The comparative competence-adjustment of student left social-political activists. Journal of Personality, 41(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00092.x

Arici-Ozan

Cekici

Arslan

(2019). The relationship between resilience and distress tolerance in college students: The mediator role of cognitive flexibility and difficulties in emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.525

Babb

(2022). Meeting the needs of nontraditional undergraduate students. Information Science Reference.

Babb

S. J.

Rufino

K. A.

Johnson

R. M.

(2022). Assessing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on nontraditional students’ mental health and well-being. Adult Education Quarterly, 72(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211027508

Bonaccio

Reeve

C. L.

Lyerly

(2016). Academic entitlement: Its personality and general mental ability correlates, and academic consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.012

Boswell

S. S.

(2012). “I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9184-4

Campbell

W. K.

Bonacci

A. M.

Shelton

Exline

J. J.

Bushman

B. J.

(2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04

Campbell

W. K.

Sedikides

(1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23

Chen

J. C.

(2017). Nontraditional adult learners: The neglected diversity in postsecondary education. SAGE Open, 7(1), 215824401769716. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697161

10.

Chesters

Watson

(2016). Staying power: The effect of pathway into university on student achievement and attrition. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56(2), 225–249.

11.

Chowning

Campbell

N. J.

(2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students’ externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016351

12.

Choy

S. P.

(2002). Findings from the condition of education 2002: Nontraditional undergraduates (NCES 2002–012). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002012.pdf

13.

Chung

Turnbull

Chur-Hansen

(2014). Who are ‘non-traditional students’? A systematic review of published definitions in research on mental health of tertiary students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(23), 1224–1238. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1944

14.

Chung

Turnbull

Chur-Hansen

(2017). Differences in resilience between ‘traditional’ and ‘non-traditional’ university students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693493

15.

Colby

S. L.

Ortman

J. M.

(2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 (current population reports, P25-1143). U.S. Government Printing Office, U.S. Census Bureau.

16.

Crone

T. S.

Babb

Torres

(2020). Assessing the relationship between nontradtional factors and academic entitlement. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620905270.

17.

Curtis

N. A.

Trice

A. D.

(2013). A revision of the academic locus of control scale for college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(3), 817–829. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.03.PMS.116.3.817-829

18.

Donaldson

J. F.

Townsend

B. K.

(2007). Higher education journals’ discourse about adult undergraduate students. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11778962

19.

Dubuovsky

S. L.

(1986). Coping with entitlement in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 315(26), 1672–1674. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198612253152609

20.

Ellis

(2019). A nontraditional conundrum: The dilemma of nontraditional student attrition in higher education. College Student Journal, 53(1), 24–32. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+NONTRADITIONAL+CONUNDRUM%3a+THE+DILEMMA+OF+NONTRADITIONAL+STUDENT...-a0584328134

21.

Erisman

Steele

(2012). From contact to completion: Supporting returning adult students in obtaining a college credential. Higher Ed Insight. Retrieved from https://higheredinsight.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/redesign_lumina-brief-oct2012.pdf

22.

Ewert

(2012, February 27). GED recipients have lower earnings, are less likely to enter college. United States Census Bureau Blogs. Retrieved from. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2012/02/ged-recipients-have-lower-earnings-are-less-likely-to-enter-college.html.

23.

Fromuth

M. E.

Bass

J. E.

Kelly

D. B.

Davis

T. L.

Kin

L. C.

(2019). entitlement: Its relationship with academic behaviors and attitudes. Social Psychology of Education (22, pp. 1153–1167). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09517-2

24.

Garvey

(2011). From GED to college degree: Creating pathways to postsecondary success for high school dropouts. Jobs for the Future. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519796.pdf

25.

Goncalves

Trunk

(2014). Obstacles to success for the nontraditional student in higher education. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 19(4), 164–172. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.jn19.4.164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315944922_Obstacles_to_Success_for_the_Nontraditional_Student_in_Higher_Education

26.

Greenberger

Lessard

Chen

Farruggia

S. P.

(2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9284-9

27.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd Ed.). The Guilford Press.

28.

Horn

L. J.

Carroll

C. D.

(1996). Nontraditional undergraduates, trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and persistence and attainment among 1989–90 beginning postsecondary students (NCES 97–578). U.S. Department of EducationU.S. Government Printing Office.

29.

Hussar

W. J.

Bailey

T. M.

(2013). Projections of education Statistics to 2022 (NCES 2014-051). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Government Printing Office. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014051.pdf

30.

Jones

Mosher

(2013). Father’s involvement with their children: United States, 2006-2010. Natl Health Stat Report, 71, 1–21. 24467852.

31.

Kamer

J. A.

Ishitani

T. T.

(2021). First-year, nontraditional student retention at four-year institutions: How predictors of attrition vary across time. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 23(3), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119858732

32.

Kasworm

C. E.

(2005). Adult student identity in an intergenerational community college classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713605280148

33.

Kasworm

C. E.

(2010). Adult learners in a research university: Negotiating undergraduate student identity. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609336110

34.

Keith

T. Z.

Pottebaum

S. M.

Eberhart

(1986). Effects of self-concept and locus of control on academic achievement: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298600400107

35.

Kenner

Weinerman

(2011). Adult learning theory: Applications to non-traditional college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 87–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850344. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ926365.pdf

36.

Kirkpatrick

M. A.

Stant

Downes

Gaither

(2008). Perceived locus of control and academic performance: Broadening the construct’s applicability. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0032

37.

Kopp

J. P.

Finney

S. J.

(2013). Linking academic entitlement and student incivility using latent means modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.727887

38.

Lambrinidis

(2014). Supporting online, non-traditional students through the introduction of effective e-learning tools in a pre-university tertiary enabling programme. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.899053

39.

Macari

D. P.

Maples

M. F.

D’Andrea

(2006). A comparative study of psychosocial development in nontraditional and traditional college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 7(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.2190/bv5h-3630-18cu-6c3b

40.

Malach

Vicherková

Barot

(2020). Locus of control analysed with regards to non-traditional tertiary students of education. Studia Paedagogica, 25(4), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.5817/sp2020-4-7.

41.

Markle

(2015). Factors influencing persistence among nontraditional university students. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615583085

42.

Martin

Hamilton

Osterman

(2018). NCHS data brief (report No. 318). National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db318.pdf

43.

McFarland

Hussar

Zhang

Wang

Hein

Diliberti

Forrest Cataldi

Bullock Mann

Barmer

(2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019144.pdf

44.

McNair

T. B.

Albertine

McDonald

Major

Cooper

M. A.

(2022). Becoming a student-ready college: A new culture of leadership for student success (2nd ed.). Wiley.

45.

Myers

C. A.

(2017). Nonintellective variables and nontraditional college students: A domain- based investigation of academic achievement. College Student Journal, 51(3), 380–390.

46.

National Student Clearinghouse . (2021). Current term enrollment estimates. https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/CTEE_Report_Spring_2021.pdf.

47.

Nelken

M. L.

(2009). Negotiating classroom process: Lessons from adult learning. Negotiation Journal, 25(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00219.x

48.

Noel

J. G.

Forsyth

D. R.

Kelley

K. N.

(1987). Improving the performance of failing students by overcoming their self-serving attributional biases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8(1and2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0801&2_10

49.

Ogden

E. P.

Trice

A. D.

(1986). The predictive validity of the academic locus of control scale for college students: Freshmen outcomes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1(4), 649–652.

50.

Radford

A. W.

Cominole

Skomsvold

(2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates: 2011-12 (NCES 2015-025). Web Tables. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015025.pdf

51.

Reeves

Rodrigue

Kneebone

(2016). Five evils: Multidimensional poverty and race in America. The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/reeveskneebonerodrigue_multidimensionalpoverty_fullpaper.pdf

52.

Rotter

J. B.

(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976

53.

Rotter

J. B.

Seeman

Liverant

(1962). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A major variable in behavior theory. In E Washburne

(Ed.). Decisions, values and groups. (Vol. 2). Pergamon Press.

54.

Sadowski

C. J.

Loftus-Vergari

M. C.

Davis

S. F.

(1978). Locus of control among students of traditional and nontraditional college age. Psychological Reports, 43(2), 618. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.618.

55.

Sautter

J. M.

Thomas

P. A.

Dupre

M. E.

George

L. K.

(2012). Socioeconomic status and the Black – White mortality crossover. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300518

56.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Salanova

González-Romá

Bakker

A. B.

(2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015630930326

57.

Seppälä

Mauno

Feldt

Hakanen

Kinnunen

Tolvanen

Schaufeli

(2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 10(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y

58.

Shapiro

P. D.

(2012). Entitled to cheat: An examination of incoming freshmen at a small regional university. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 4(1), 1–15.

59.

Sims

C. H.

Barnett

D. R.

(2015). Devalued, misunderstood, and marginalized: Why nontraditional students’ experiences should be included in the diversity discourse. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 8(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1175&context=ojwed

60.

Snyder

T. D.

Dillow

S. A.

(2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Department of Education. Government Printing Office, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.

61.

Sohr-Preston

Boswell

S. S.

(2015). Predicting academic entitlement in undergraduates. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 183–193. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082877.pdf

62.

Stone

O’Shea

May

Delahunty

Partington

(2016). Opportunity through online learning: Experiences of first-in-family students in online open-entry higher education. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56(2), 146–169.

63.

Trenz

R. C.

Ecklund-Flores

Rapoza

(2015). A comparison of mental health and alcohol use between traditional and nontraditional students. Journal of American College Health, 63(8), 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1040409

64.

Trolian

T. L.

Jach

E. A.

Hanson

J. M.

Pascarella

E. T.

(2016). Influencing academic motivation: The effects of student – faculty interaction. Journal of College Student Development, 57(7), 810–826. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0080

65.

Williams

D. R.

Mohammed

S. A.

(2013). Racism and health I: Pathways and scientific evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487340