Nontraditional students pursuing an advanced degree face unique challenges as compared to full-time traditional students. Current and former masters and PhD students (N = 266) were surveyed to examine differences in their educational experiences and emotional outcomes, and determinants of their positive and negative graduate education experiences. Traditional and nontraditional students differed significantly on most of the variables. Compared to traditional students, nontraditional students reported higher positive emotional experiences. Simple linear ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models were used to examine the determinants of positive and negative experiences during graduate education. Self-fulfillment motives were the strongest predictors of positive emotional experiences, while stress and anxiety uniformly predicted negative experiences; with variability in determinants of emotional experiences between traditional and nontraditional students.
AlexanderQ. R.BodenhornN. (2015). My rock: Black women attending graduate school at a predominantly white university. American Counseling Association, 18(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocc.12019
BarataP.HunjanS.LeggattJ. (2005). Ivory tower? Feminist women’s experiences of graduate school. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(2–3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.010
4.
BartonB. A.BulmerS. M. (2017). Correlates and predictors of depression and anxiety disorders in graduate students. Health Educator, 49(2), 17–26.
5.
BellN. E. (2009). Data sources: Non-traditional students in graduate education. CGS Communicator, 42(10), 6–8.
6.
BostickD. N.HenryC. M.BrownL. C. (2021). Exploring Black graduate women’s perceptions of student loan debt. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000341
7.
BrockT. (2010). Young adults and higher education: Barriers and breakthroughs to success. The Future of Children, 20(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0040
8.
ChoyS. (2002). Nontraditional undergraduates: Findings from the condition of education 2002. NCES 2002-012. National Center for Education Statistics.
ClarkC. R.MercerS. H.Zeigler-HillV.DufreneB. A. (2019, December 27). Barriers to the success of ethnic minority students in school psychology graduate programs. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087519
11.
de Oliveira SilvaJ. H.de Sousa MendesG. H.GangaG. M. D.MergulhãoR. C.LizarelliF. L. (2020). Antecedents and consequents of student satisfaction in higher technical-vocational education: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-019-09407-1
12.
DonaldsonJ. F. (1993). A triangulated study comparing adult college students’ perceptions of effective teaching with those of traditional students. Continuing Higher Education Review, 57(3), 147–165.
13.
ElyE. E. (1997). The non-traditional student [Paper presentation]. American Association of Community Colleges Annual Conferences, Anaheim, CA, April 12–15, 1997.
14.
FeldmanK. A. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view: Matched or mismatched priorities?Research in Higher Education, 28(4), 291–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01006402
15.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150
16.
FoltzB. M.LuzzoD. A. (1998). Increasing the career decision‐making self‐efficacy of nontraditional college students. Journal of College Counseling, 1(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.1998.tb00122.x
17.
GardnerS. K.HolleyK. A. (2011). Those invisible barriers are real”: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.529791
18.
GildersleeveR. E.CroomN. N.VasquezP. L. (2011). Am I going crazy?!”: A critical race analysis of doctoral education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.539472
19.
GirvesJ. E.WemmerusV. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress [Article]. Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981691
20.
GradyR. K.La ToucheR.Oslawski-LopezJ.PowersA.SimacekK. (2014). Betwixt and between: The social position and stress experiences of graduate students. Teaching Sociology, 42(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x13502182
GriffinK.BakerV.O’MearaK.NyuntG.RobinsonT.StaplesC. L. (2018). Supporting scientists from underrepresented minority backgrounds: Mapping developmental networks. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education.
23.
HagedornL. S. (1993). Graduate retention: An investigation of factors relating to older female graduate students. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper.
24.
HagedornL. S. (1999). Factors related to the retention of female graduate students over 30. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 1(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2190/lkwc-ejub-v5km-brnq
25.
HandsA. S. (2020). What's your type? An examination of first-year doctoral student motivation [Article]. Education for Information, 36(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-200373
26.
HardréP. L.HackettS. (2015a). Beyond instrumentation: Redesigning measures and methods for evaluating the graduate college experience. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(3), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-014-9201-6
27.
HardréP. L.HackettS. M. (2015b). Understanding the graduate college experience: Perceptual differences by degree type, point-in-program and disciplinary subgroups. Learning Environments Research, 18(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9194-1
HesliV. L.DeLaatJ.YoudeJ.MendezJ.LeeS.-s. (2006). Success in graduate school and after: Survey results from the midwest region, part III. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(2), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060513
30.
HornL. J.CarrollC. D. (1996). Nontraditional undergraduates: Trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and persistence and attainment among 1989-90 beginning postsecondary students. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. Statistical analysis report. ERIC.
31.
IvesG.RowleyG. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph. D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
32.
JinkensR. C. (2009). Nontraditional students: Who are they?College Student Journal, 43(4).
33.
KimK. A. (2002). ERIC review: Exploring the meaning of“ nontraditional” at the community college. Community College Review, 30(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210203000104
KnowlesM. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
36.
LoengS. (2017). Alexander Kapp – the first known user of the andragogy concept. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 36(6), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2017.1363826
37.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.De BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilkinson-FlickerS.GebrekristosS.ZhangJ.RathbunA.BarmerA. (2017). The condition of education 2017. NCES 2017-144. National Center for Education Statistics.
38.
OffermanM. (2011). Profile of the nontraditional doctoral degree student. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2011(129), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.397
39.
O'keefeV. (1993). How to help adult and nontraditional students find success through the communication course.
40.
OswaltS. B.RiddockC. C. (2007). What to do about being overwhelmed: Graduate students, stress and university services. College Student Affairs Journal, 27(1), 24–44.
41.
RadfordA.CominoleM.SkomsvoldP. (2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates: 2011-12 [NCES pub. No. 2015-025]. National Center for Educational Statistics.
RosenthalG. T.FolseE. J.AllemanN. W.BoudreauxD.SoperB.Von BergenC. (2000). The one to one survey: Traditional versus nontraditional student satisfaction with professors during one to one contacts. Caring, 37(3010), 1–46.
44.
Ross-GordonJ. M. (1991). Needed: A multicultural perspective for adult education research. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369104200101
45.
Ross‐GordonJ. M. (2003). Adult learners in the classroom. New Directions for Student Services, 2003(102), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.88
46.
SchroederS. M.TerrasK. L. (2015). Advising experiences and needs of online, cohort, and classroom adult graduate learners. The Journal of the National Academic Advising Association, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-13-044
47.
ScottL. M.LewisC. W. (2011). Nontraditional college students: Assumptions, perceptions, and directions for a meaningful academic experience. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v06i04/52068
48.
SolorzanoD. G. (1993). The road to the doctorate for California's chicanas and chicanos: A study of ford foundation minority fellows. CPS Report.
TompkinsK. A.BrechtK.TuckerB.NeanderL. L.SwiftJ. K. (2016). Who matters most? The contribution of faculty, student-peers, and outside support in predicting graduate student satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 10(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000115
51.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
52.
ZajacovaA.LynchS. M.EspenshadeT. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z
