Drawing upon a pilot study and a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight research study to explore how a multiliteracies framework may inform more critical and creative pedagogical approaches for adolescents and adults, this article begins with a brief overview of the literature on multiliteracies and then overviews the methodology used in the two research studies. Although multiliteracies has not been used frequently as a theoretical framework to inform work in adult learning contexts, this article argues that there are many benefits to this approach for adult educators to consider, particularly given the increasing need to attend to learning issues pertaining to globalization, diversity, and the impact of new technologies. Data from the interviews are combined with an analysis of the literature to explore the benefits offered by a multiliteracies approach by considering four main areas: lifelong learning and multimodalities; opportunities for engagement for English as Additional Language learners; new digital technologies and multiliteracies; and multiliteracies’ emphasis on social justice. The article concludes with a consideration of the potential for multiliteracies to inform educators working in a range of adult learning contexts.
Barton, D., Ivanič,R., Appleby, Y., Hodge, R., Tusting, K. (2007). Literacy, lives and learning.
Routledge.
2.
BartonD.HamiltonM.IvaničR. (Eds) (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context.
Routledge.
3.
BrookfieldS. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions.
Jossey-Bass.
4.
ButterwickS. (2014).
But you’re not a teacher: Bridging the divide between adult and teacher education. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education,
26(2), 59–66.
5.
Carcasson, M., & Sprain, L. (2012). Deliberative democracy and adult civic education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2012(135), 15--23.
6.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.).
Sage.
7.
CloverD. E. (2010).
A contemporary review of feminist aesthetic practice in selective adult education journals and conference proceedings. Adult Education Quarterly,
60(3), 233–248.
8.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures.
Routledge.
9.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2009). “
Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal,
4, 164–195.
10.
CurranV.GustafsonD. L.SimmonsK.LannonH.WangC.GarmsiriM. (2019).
Adult learners’s perceptions of self-directed learning and digital technology usage in continuing professional education: An update for the digital age. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education,
25(1), 74–93.
11.
CrantonP. (2016).
Continuing professional education for teachers and university and college faculty. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education,
151, 43–52.
12.
Crowther, J. (2013).
Adult education for social justice. Studies in the Education of Adults,
45(1), 1--3.
13.
CrowtherJ.HamiltonM.TettL. (Eds). (2006). Powerful literacies.
National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
14.
CrowtherJ.TettL. (2011).
Critical and social literacy practices from the Scottish adult literacy experience: Resisting deficit approaches to learning. Literacy,
45(3), 134–140.
15.
DirkxJ. M. (1998).
Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning,
7, 1–14.
16.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling.
Routledge.
17.
Gouthro, P. A. (2009).
Neoliberalism, lifelong learning and the homeplace: Problematizing the boundaries of ‘public’ and ‘private’ to explore women’s learning experiences. Studies in Continuing Education,
31(2), 157--172.
18.
Gouthro, P. A. (2017). Creativity, the arts, and transformative learning. In Milana, M., Webb, S., Holford, J., Waller, R. & Jarvis, P. (Eds). International handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning (pp. 1011--1026). Palgrave-MacMillan.
19.
Gouthro, P. A., & Holloway, S. M. (2013).
Preparing teachers to become lifelong learners: Exploring the use of fiction to develop multiliteracies and critical thinking. Language & Literacy,
15(3), 50.
20.
GregsonJ. A.StuckoP. A. (2007).
Teachers as adult learners: Re-conceptualizing professional development. Journal of Adult Education,
36(1), 1–18.
21.
HamiltonM.BartonD. (2000).
The international adult literacy survey: What does it really measure?International Review of Education,
46(5), 377–389.
22.
HamiltonM.TettL.CrowtherJ. (2012). More powerful literacies: An introduction. In TettL.HamiltonM.CrowtherJ. (Eds), More powerful literacies (pp. 1–12).
National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
23.
HerreraS. G.MurryK. G. (2016). Mastering ESL /EFL methods: Differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students (3rd ed.).
Pearson.
24.
JewittC. (2017). A multimodal perspective on touch, communication, and learning. In SerafiniF.GeeE. (Eds). Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from new London to new times.
Teachers College Press.
KincheloeJ. L.McLarenP.SteinbergS. R. (2011). In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–178).
Sage.
27.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication.
Routledge.
28.
LinA. M.HeP. (2017).
Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classrooms. Journal of Language, Identity & Education,
16(4), 228–244.
29.
McPheeS.PickrenG. (2017).
Blended learning with international students: A multiliteracies approach. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,
41(3), 418–433.
30.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.).
Sage.
31.
MartinA. (2011). ‘
The real world’: Lived literacy practices and cultural learning from community placement. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,
34(2), 219–235.
32.
MerriamS. B.BieremaL. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice.
Jossey-Bass.
33.
MillsK. (2015). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses.
Multilingual Matters.
34.
MirraN.MorrellE.FilipiakD. (2018).
From digital consumption to digital invention: Toward a new critical theory and practice of multiliteracies. Theory into Practice,
57, 12–19.
35.
MojabS. (2005).
Class and race. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education,
106, 73–82.
36.
NagleJ.StookeR. (2016).
Railways, rebellions and rage against the machine: Adolescents’ interests and meaning-making in the creation of multimodal identity texts. Literacy,
50(3), 158–165.
37.
New London Group. (1996).
A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review,
66(1), 60–92.
38.
NtelioglouB. Y.FanninJ.MontaneraM.CumminsJ. (2014).
A multilingual and multimodal approach to literacy teaching and learning in urban education: A collaborative inquiry project in an inner city elementary school. Frontiers in Psychology,
5, 1–10.
39.
Pei-Ling TanJ.McWilliamE. L. (2009).
From literacy to multiliteracies: Diverse learners and pedagogical practices. Pedagogies: An International Journal,
4(3), 213–225.
40.
PenuelW. R.O’ConnorK. (2018).
From designing to organizing new social futures: Multiliteracies pedagogies for today. Theory into Practice,
57, 64–71.
41.
RowsellJ.WalshM. (2011).
Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies, & new literacies. Brock Education,
21(1), 53–62.
42.
SmytheS. (2018).
Adult learning in the control society: Digital era governance, literacies of control, and the work of adult educators. Adult Education Quarterly,
68(3), 197–214.
43.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 433–466).
Sage.
44.
Street, B. V.(1984). Literacy in theory and practice.
Cambridge University Press.
45.
TettL.CrowtherJ. (1998).
Families at a disadvantage: Class, culture, and literacies. British Educational Research Journal,
24(4), 449–460.
46.
WestL.FlemingT.FinneganF. (2013).
Connecting Bourdieu, Winnicot, and Honneth: Understanding the experiences of non-traditional learners through an interdisciplinary lens. Studies in the Education of Adults,
45(20), 119–134.
47.
WheelerR.SwordsR. (2015). Code-switching and contrastive analysis. In BoydF. B.BrockC. H. (Eds), Social diversity within multiliteracies: Complexity in teaching and learning.
Routledge.
