While nontraditional students are a growing population in colleges and universities today, their presence can also be seen throughout history. National policies and practices throughout United States history enabled a more diverse population of students to enter higher education, thus increasing the nontraditional student population. In this historical literature review, I examine four time periods in which nontraditional students persisted and the unique services and support offered to them. Common among the four time periods were three ways that nontraditional students were supported historically: institutions (1) awarded credit for nonacademic activities, (2) increased flexibility in their policies and procedures, and (3) provided resources specific to nontraditional students’ needs. While policies have allowed greater numbers of nontraditional students to enter higher education, admitting these students does not guarantee their retention and degree completion. Therefore, this manuscript offers suggestions, taken from historical trends, for how institutions can continue to support current and future nontraditional students. Although institutions today are certainly more aware, understanding, and inclusive of diverse students’ needs, lessons from history can still be used to make improvements. Examining past students, services, and practices may help to improve future policies and attainment strategies for this diverse population of students in higher education.
AllenI. E.SeamanJ. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning.
Newburyport, MA:
Sloan Consortium.
3.
AllenI. E.SeamanJ. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009.
Newburyport, MA:
Sloan Consortium.
4.
AstinA. W. (1984).
Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel,
24, 297–308.
5.
BaldwinJ. (1888).
The distinctive work of the normal school. The Addresses and Journal of Proceedings of the National Educational Association, Session of the Year 1887, 476–479.
6.
BeanJ. P.MetznerB. S. (1985).
A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research,
55, 485–540.
7.
BenshoffJ. M. (1993). Educational opportunities, developmental challenges: Understanding nontraditional college students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Adult Development and Aging, New Orleans, LA.
8.
BowlM. (2001).
Experiencing the barriers: Non-traditional students entering higher education. Research Papers in Education,
16(2), 141–160.
9.
BrinthauptT. M.EadyE. (2014).
Faculty members’ attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors toward their nontraditional students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education,
62(3), 131–140.
10.
BrownR. E. (2001).
The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
5(2), 18–35.
11.
BrownS. M. (2002).
Strategies that contribute to nontraditional/adult student development and persistence. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning,
11, 67–76.
12.
BrumbaughA. J. (1944).
Planning education for returning members of the Armed Forces. The American Association of Teachers Colleges, 23rd Yearbook, 53–54.
13.
Chung, E., Turnbull, D., & Chur-Hansen, A. (2014). Who are non-traditional students? A systematic review of published definitions in research on mental health of tertiary students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(22), 1224–1238.
14.
CohenA. M.BrawerF. B. (2003). The American community college.
San Francisco, CA:
John Wiley.
15.
ColvinB. B. (2013).
Where is Merlin when I need him? The barriers to higher education are still in place: Recent re‐entry experience. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development,
25(2), 19–32.
CrawleyA.FetznerM. (2013).
Providing service innovations to students inside and outside of the online classroom: Focusing on student success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
17(1), 7–12.
18.
CrossK. P. (1981). Adults as learners.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
19.
DauerR. A.AbsherB. (2015).
The influence of student support programs upon the academic success of nontraditional students. International Journal of Education,
7(4), 97–119.
20.
DiazD. P. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Retrieved from http://www.LTSeries.com/LTS/pdf_docs/dissertn.pdf
21.
DilleB.MezackM. (1991).
Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. The American Journal of Distance Education,
5(1), 24–35.
22.
DunhamE. A. (1969). Colleges of the forgotten Americans: A profile of state colleges and regional universities.
New York, NY:
McGraw Hill.
23.
Dupin-BryantP. A. (2004).
Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education,
18(4), 199–206.
24.
Dupin-BryantP. A.DuCharme-HansenB. A. (2005).
Assessing student needs in web-based distance education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,
2(1), 39–47.
25.
DuttonJ.DuttonM.PerryJ. (2002).
How do online students differ from lecture students?Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
6(1), 1–20.
26.
FairchildE. (2003). Multiple roles of adult learners. In KilgoreD.RiceP. (Eds.), Meeting the special needs of adult student, 11-16
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
27.
FineB. (1947).
Veterans raise college standards. Educational Outlook,
22(11), 54–61.
28.
Fonte, L. F. (2008). What price PLA? The financial implications to the institution of awarding credit for prior learning assessment. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 56(1), 64--65.
29.
FredE. B. (1951). Report of the president for the year 1949-1950.
Madison:
University of Wisconsin.
30.
GarmezyN.CroseJ. M. (1948).
A comparison of the academic achievement of matched groups of veteran and non-veteran freshmen at the University of Iowa. The Journal of Educational Research,
41(7), 547–550.
31.
GiancolaJ.GrawitchM.BorchertD. (2009).
Dealing with the stress of college. A Model for Adult Students. Adult Education Quarterly,
59(3), 246–263.
32.
GibsonC. C.GraffA. O. (1992).
Impact of adults’ preferred learning styles and perception of barriers on completions of external baccalaureate degree programs. Journal of Distance Education,
7(1), 39–51.
33.
GrimesS. K.AntworthT. (1996).
Community college withdrawal decisions: Student characteristics and subsequent reenrollment patterns. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,
20, 345–361.
34.
HableyW. R.McClanahanR. (2004). What works in student retention? Four-year public colleges.
Iowa City, IA:
ACT.
35.
HarasimL. (2000).
Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education,
3(1), 41–61.
36.
HillmanS. J.CorkeryM. G. (2010).
University infrastructural needs and decisions in moving towards online delivery programmes. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,
32(5), 467–474.
37.
Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 245--260.
JonesS. W. (1986).
No magic required: Reducing freshman attrition at the community college. Community College Review,
14(2), 14–18.
40.
KaneT. J.RouseC. E. (1999).
The community college: Educating students at the margin between college and work. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
13(1), 63–84.
41.
Kasworm, C. E. (2010). Adult learners in a research university: Negotiating undergraduate student identity. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 143--160.
42.
KeithP. M. (2007).
Barriers and nontraditional students’ use of academic and social services. College Student Journal,
41(4), 1123–1127.
43.
KemberD. (1989).
A longitudinal process model of drop-out from distance education. Journal of Higher Education,
60(3), 278–301.
KranzowJ. (2013).
Faculty leadership in online education: Structuring courses to impact student satisfaction and persistence. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,
9(1), 131–139.
46.
LakinM. B.MullaneL.RobinsonS. P. (2007). Framing new terrain: Older adults & higher education.
Washington, DC:
American Council on Education.
47.
Langrehr, K. J., Phillips, J. C., Melville, A., & Eum, K. (2015). Determinants of nontraditional student status: A methodological review of the research. Journal of College Student Development, 56(8), 876--881.
48.
LaPadulaM. (2003).
A comprehensive look at online student support services for distance learners. American Journal of Distance Education,
17(2), 119–128.
49.
LaPointeL.ReisetterM. (2008).
Belonging online: Students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of an online learning community. International Journal on ELearning,
7(4), 641–665.
50.
LevyM. A.PolnarievB. A. (Eds.). (2016). Academic and student affairs in collaboration: Creating a culture of student success.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
51.
MaguireL. L. (2005).
Literature review–faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,
8(1), 1–16.
52.
MaorD. (2003).
The teacher’s role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Educational Media International,
40(1–2), 127–138.
53.
MatthewsD. (1999).
The origins of distance education and its use in the United States. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education),27(2), 54–60.
54.
MettlerS. (2002).
Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review,
96(2), 351–365.
55.
MeyerS. N. (2014). Not designed with us in mind: exploring the experiences and needs of adult learners at a public research university. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/178/
56.
MilemJ. F.BergerJ. B. (1997).
A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development,
38(4), 387–400.
57.
MoodyJ. (2004).
Distance education: Why are the attrition rates so high?Quarterly Review of Distance Education,
5(3), 205–210.
58.
MooreM. G.KearsleyG. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.).
Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Company.
59.
National Institute of Education. (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60.
NullJ. W. (2007).
Curriculum for teachers: Four traditions within pedagogical philosophy. Educational Studies,
42, 43–63.
61.
OgrenC. A. (2003).
Rethinking the “nontraditional” student from a historical perspective: State normal schools in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Journal of Higher Education,
74(6), 640–664.
62.
OgrenC. A. (2005). The American state normal school: An instrument of great good.
New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
OlsonK. W. (1973).
The GI Bill and higher education: Success and surprise. American Quarterly,
25(5), 596–610.
64.
PalloffR. M.PrattK. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace (Vol. 12).
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
65.
ParkJ. H.ChoiH. J. (2009).
Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
12(4), 1–5.
66.
ParrS. S. (1888).
The normal-school problem. The Addresses and Journal of Proceedings of the National Educational Association, Session of the Year 1887, 467–476.
67.
ParsonsW. W. (1890).
The normal school curriculum. The Addresses and Journal of Proceedings of the National Educational Association, Session of the Year 1887, 718–724.
68.
PayneW. H. (1887). Contributions to the science of education.
New York, NY:
Harper and Brothers.
69.
PelletierS. G. (2010).
Success for adult students. Public Purpose,
12, 2–6.
70.
PhilibertN.AllenJ.EllevenR. (2008).
Nontraditional students in community colleges and the model of college outcomes for adults. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,
32(8), 582–596.
71.
Quiggins, A., Ulmer, J., Hainline, M. S., Burris, S., Ritz, R., & Van Dusen, R. (2016). Motivations and barriers of undergraduate nontraditional students in the college of agricultural sciences and natural resources at Texas Tech University. NACTA Journal, 60(3), 272--281.
72.
QuimbyJ.O’BrienK. (2006).
Predictors of well-being among nontraditional female students with children. Journal of Counseling and Development,
84(4), 451–460.
73.
RadfordA. W.CominoleM.SkomsvoldP. (2015). Demographic and enrollment characteristics of nontraditional undergraduates: 2011-12. Web Tables. NCES 2015-025.
Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Statistics.
74.
ReeseW. J. (2011). America’s public schools: From the common school to “no child left behind”.
Baltimore, MD:
JHU Press.
75.
Ridley, D. R., & Sammour, H. Y. (1996). Viable alternative means of instructional delivery: Online courses as an alternative teaching method. College Student Journal, 30(3), 337--339.
76.
RovaiA. P. (2003).
In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education,
6(1), 1–16.
77.
Rust, D. Z., & Ikard, W. L. (2016). Prior learning assessment portfolio completion: Improved outcomes at a public institution. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(2), 94--100.
78.
SeftorN. S.TurnerS. E. (2002).
Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. Journal of Human Resources, 37(2), 336–352.
79.
SelingoJ. (2000).
Facing new missions and rivals, state colleges seek a makeover. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(12), 40–42.
80.
ShrivastavaP. (1999).
Management classes as online learning communities. Journal of Management Education,
23(6), 691–702.
81.
SimsC. H.BarnettD. R. (2015).
Devalued, misunderstood, and marginalized: Why nontraditional students' experiences should be included in the diversity discourse. Online Journal for Workforce Education & Development,
8(1), 1–14.
82.
SouderW. E. (1994).
The effectiveness of traditional vs. satellite delivery in three management of technology master’s degree programs. TheAmerican Journal of Distance Education,
7(1), 37–53.
83.
StreeterR. B. (1980).
Alternative financial resources for the nontraditional student. Journal of Student Financial Aid,
10(2), 17–22.
84.
ThelinJ. R. (2011). A history of American higher education.
Baltimore, MA:
John Hopkins University Press.
85.
ThompsonM. M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In GibsonC. (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 9–24).
Madison, WI:
Atwood.
86.
ThompsonR. B.FlesherM. A. (1947).
Comparative academic records of veterans and civilian students. Journal of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars,
22, 169–179.
87.
Thompson-EbanksV. (2015).
Leaving college prematurely the experiences of nontraditional-age college students with depression. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
18(4), 474–495.
88.
TibbittsC.HunterW. W. (1947).
Veterans and non-veterans at the University of Michigan. School and Society,
65, 347–350.
89.
TintoV. (1975).
Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research,
45(1), 89–125.
90.
TintoV. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 51–89). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
91.
TovenJ. R. (1945).
College counseling for the war veteran. The Journal of Educational Sociology,
18(6), 331–339.
92.
TrivettD. A. (1973). Goals for higher education: Definitions and directions. ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 6.
Washington, DC:
American Association for Higher Education.
93.
TysonW. (2012).
Negative impact of employment on engineering student time management, time to degree, and retention: Faculty, administrator, and staff perspectives. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
13(4), 479–498.
94.
Horn, L. J. & Carroll, C. D. (1996). Nontraditional undergraduates: Trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and persistence and attainment among 1989-90 beginning postsecondary students (NCES 97-578).
Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/web/97578.asp
95.
U.S. Congress House Committee on World War Veterans’ Legislation. (1945). Hearings on H.R. 3749 and related bills to amend the servicemen’s readjustment act of 1944. 79th Cong., 1st session. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
96.
ViggianoR.AultM. (2001).
Online library instruction for online students. Information Technology and Libraries,
20(3), 135–138.
97.
WallerW. W. (1970). On the family, education, and war; selected writings.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
98.
WitkowskyP.MendezS.OgunbowoO.ClaytonG.HernandezN. (2016).
Nontraditional student perceptions of collegiate inclusion. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education,
64(1), 30–41.
99.
WojciechowskiA.PalmerL. B. (2005).
Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes?Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,
8(2), 1–20.
100.
XuD.JaggarsS. S. (2013).
The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review,
37, 46–57.
