The Library of Birmingham (LoB) is a £193million project designed to provide a new space for lifelong learning and knowledge growth, a physical and virtual portal for Birmingham's citizens to the wider world. In cooperation with a range of private, public, and third-sector bodies, as well as individual citizens, the library, due to open in June 2013, will articulate a continuing process of organic growth and emergence. Key delivery themes focus on: arts and creativity, citizenship and community, enterprise and innovation, learning and skills and the new media ecology. A landmark design in the heart of the cultural district of the city, the LoB aims to stimulate sustainable economic growth, urban regeneration and social inclusion by offering a wide range of new digital learning services, real and virtual community spaces, and new opportunities for interpreting and exploiting internationally significant collections of documentary archives, photography, moving image, and rare printed books. Additionally, the LoB will offer physical space for creative, cultural, enterprise, and knowledge development. This paper outlines the cultural and educational thinking that informs the project and the challenges experienced in developing innovative service redesign.
AshcroftL. (2008) ‘Partnerships between public libraries and other agencies in England for provision of adult learning’, Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council in Quebec, Canada.
2.
BattlesM. (2004) Library: An Unquiet History, London: Vintage.
3.
Birmingham City Council (2009) Birmingham City Council Public Library Users Survey September 2009, Birmingham: BCC.
BlackA.CrannM. (2002) ‘In the public eye: A mass observation of the public library’, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, vol 34(3), pp. 145–57.
10.
BlackA.HoareP. (eds) (2006) The Cambridge History of Libraries in Great Britain and Ireland Volume 3, 1850–2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FalkJ. H.DierkingL. N. (2002) Lessons without Limit: How Free-Choice Learning is Transforming Education, New York: Altamira Press.
22.
FoucaultM. (1993) ‘Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias’, in OckmanJ. (ed) Architecture Culture 1943–1968, New York: Rizzoli.
23.
FrancisH. (1976) ‘Workers' libraries: The origins of the South Wales Miners' Library’, History Workshop Journal, vol 2(1), pp. 183–205.
24.
GarciaB.MelvilleR.CoxT. (2010) ‘Creating an impact: Liverpool's experience as European Capital of Culture’, Liverpool: University of Liverpool/Liverpool John Moores University/Liverpool City Council, available online at www.liv.ac.uk/impacts08/ (accessed 10 May 2010).
HawkB.RiederD. M.OviedoO. (2008) Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools, Minneapolis MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
32.
HickenM. (2004) ‘“To each according to his needs”: Public libraries and socially excluded people’, Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol 21(Suppl. 2), pp. 45–53.
JohnsonC. A. (2010) ‘Do public libraries contribute to social capital? A. preliminary investigation into the relationship’, Library & Information Science Research, vol 32(2), pp. 147–55.
38.
KrukM. (1998) ‘Death of the public library: From “people's university” to “public sector leisure centre”’, Australian Library Journal, vol 47(2), pp. 157–67.
39.
KrukM. (2003) ‘Truth and libraries’, Australian Library Journal, vol 52(3), pp. 229–38.
40.
LeesL. (1997) ‘Ageographia, heterotopia, and Vancouver's new public library’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol 15(3), pp. 321–47.
41.
LefebvreH. (1996) Writings on the City, Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
ManguelA. (1996) A History of Reading, London: HarperCollins.
43.
MarcuseP. (2009) ‘From critical urban theory to the right to the city’, City, vol 13(2), pp. 185–97.
MitchellD. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space, New York: Guildford Press.
47.
MozorovE. (2009) ‘Texting toward utopia: Does the Internet spread democracy?’, Boston Review, March/April, available online at http://bostonreview.net/BR34.2/morozov.php (accessed 5 June 2010).
48.
MuddimanD.DurraniS.DutchM.LinleyR.PatemanJ.VincentJ. (2001) ‘Open to all? The public library and social exclusion: Executive summary’, New Library World, vol 102(1163/1164), pp. 154–7.
49.
OldenburgR. (1989) The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day, New York: Paragon House.
50.
PineB. J.IIGilmoreJ. H. (1999) The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage, Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.
51.
ProcterR.UsherwoodB.SobczykG. (1997) What happens when a public library service closes down?Library Management, vol 18(1), pp. 59–64.
52.
ReayD. (2005) ‘Beyond consciousness?: The psychic landscape of social class’, Sociology, vol 39(5), pp. 911–28.
53.
RoseJ. (2002) The Intellectual History of the British Working Classes, New Haven: Yale University Press.
54.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002) ‘Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol 28, pp. 443–78.
55.
SojaE. W. (1996) Thirdspace, Oxford, Blackwell.
56.
ThriftN. (2000) ‘Entanglements of power: Shadows?’, in SharpJ.RoutledgeP.PhiloC.PaddisonR. (eds), Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance, London: Routledge.
57.
UlmerG. L. (2003) Internet Invention: From Literacy to Electracy, New York: Longman.
58.
WalkerC.ManjarrezC. A. (2003) ‘Partnerships for free-choice learning: Public libraries, museums, and public broadcasters working together’, Washington DC: Urban Institute/Urban Libraries Council, available online at www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410661_partnerships_for_free_choice_learning.pdf (accessed 8 May 2010).
59.
WalsA. E. J.HoevenDerN.BlankenH. (2009) The Acoustics of Social Learning: Designing Learning Processes that Contribute to a More Sustainable World, Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
