This paper proposes and discusses the need for research into foundation degrees which have been specifically developed for teaching assistants. This is necessary to develop knowledge and understanding due to the deficiency of pertinent research and potential consequences to all those involved. All relevant parties, from policy makers to individuals, need available to them the latest information rooted in knowledge, in order to support effective decision making. The author makes the case for undertaking this research through the interpretive approach, in that the ‘reality’ is what it is construed to be, to be accessed through the adoption of the frame of reference of the participants. By exploring the relevant context of the particular policies, social processes and social structures involved, the impact and association that exists could also be acknowledged, along with the environment in which the relevant population operates. These include those at the macro-level or socio-structural level, the meso-level or institutional/organisational level and at the micro-level or personal/individual perspective. Within these levels, foundation degrees will be discussed, examining their influence on areas such as widening participation and in particular – teaching assistants. It is proposed that the consequences of foundation degrees for teaching assistants may be so significant and wide ranging that it is imperative to research without delay the impact on all those involved.
AllenLStoranJ, (2005) Widening Participation: A Rough Guide for Higher Education Providers.Action on Access: University of Bradford.
2.
AngristJ D, (2004) ‘American education research changes tack’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 198–212.
3.
ArcherL, (2006) ‘Round Pegs into Square Holes? Critical issues for widening participation’, in Perspective and Practice in Widening Participation in the Social Sciences, JaryDJonesR. (eds.) pp 33–60, Birmingham: C-SAP.
4.
ATL, DfES, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NEOST, PAT, SHA, TGWU, UNISON, WAG (2003) Raising Standards and Tackling Workload: A National Agreement.London: DfES.
5.
BeaneyP, (2006) Researching Foundation Degrees: Linking Research and Practice.London: fdf Publications.
BeyerL. E. (1996). Creating democratic classrooms: The struggle to integrate theory and practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
BlatchfordPMartinCMoriartyVBassettPGoldsteinH, (2002) Pupil Adult Ratio Differences and Educational Progress Over Reception and Key Stage 1, DfES Research Report 335. London: DfES.
10.
BlunkettD, (2000) Speech on Higher Education, 15 February 2000 at Maritime Greenwich University, http://cmsl.gre.ac.uk/dfee/.
11.
BoshierR. (1997) Futuristic metropolis or second-rate? Adult education in Hong Kong before and after 1997. Comparative Education, 33 (2), 265–275.
BrymanA. (2001) Social Research Methods.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
BullockHMountfordJStanleyR, (2001) Better Policy Making.Centre for Management and Policy Studies. London: Cabinet Office.
15.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis.London: Heinemann Educational Books.
16.
BusherH, (2000) Working with Support Staff to improve school performance. In BusherHHarrisA, (2000) Subject Leadership and School Improvement.London: Paul Chapman Pub Ltd.
17.
CajklerWSageRTennantGTiknazYTuckerSTaylorC, (2007) A Systematic Literature Review on how Training and Professional Development Activities Impact on Teaching Assistants' Classroom Practice (1988–2006). Report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
18.
CantrellD.C. (1993) The Interpretive Perspective. In MrazekR. (ed) Alternative Paradigms in Environmental Education Research: NAAEE, Troy, Ohio.
19.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2003) Research Methods in Education (6th Edition). London: Routledge Falmer.
20.
CookALeckeyJ, (1999) ‘Do expectations meet reality? A survey of changes in first year student opinion’, Journal of Further and Higher Education23(2), pp. 157–171.
21.
CreminHThomasGVincettK, (2005) ‘Working with teaching assistants: Three models evaluated research papers’, Education, vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 413–432.
Department for Education and Skills (2003b) 21st Century Skills – Realising our Potential-Individuals, Employers, Nation, Skills Strategy White Paper. London: HMSO.
DeweyJ, (1933) How We Think. A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative ProcessRevised ed.. Boston: D. C. Heath.
27.
EdmundN, (2004) ‘The Foundation Degrees as evidence of a new higher education: A study of HE provision for teaching assistants’, Higher Education ReviewVol. 36, No. 3.
28.
EOC (2004) Plugging Britain's Skills Gap: Challenging Gender Segregation in Training and Work, May 2004. Manchester: EOC.
FryerR H, (1997) Learning for the Twenty-First Century. First report of the national Advisory Group for Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, www.lifelonglearning.co.uk.
31.
GallacherJIngramRReeveF, (2006) Differing National Models of Short Cycle, Work-related Higher Education Provision in Scotland and England.Glasgow: Centre for Research in Lifelong Learning, Glasgow Caledonian University. http://crll.gcal.ac.uk/docs/HN_FD%20comparativepaper%20final.pdf.
32.
GibbsP, (2002a) ‘Marketing issues for non-degree United Kingdom higher education: The case of foundation degrees’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 237–248(12).
33.
GibbsP, (2002b) ‘Who deserves foundation degrees?’Journal of Further and Higher EducationVol. 26, No. 3, pp. 197–206.
34.
GilbertN, (1993) Analysing Tabular Data: Loglinear and Logistic Models for Social Researchers.London: UCL Press.
35.
GillhamB. (2000) Case Study Research Methods.London: Continuum.
GorardSReesG, (2002) Creating a Learning Society?Bristol: Policy Press.
38.
HagyardA.KeenanC. (2006) Go on then prove it! Using Research to develop Excellence in Learning Development. LDHEN Symposium: Liverpool Hope.
39.
HancockRSwannWMarrATurnerJCableC, (2002) Classroom Assistants in Primary Schools: Employment and Deployment (project dissemination report). Milton Keynes: Faculty of Education and Language Studies, The Open University.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (2003) HEFCE Strategic Plan 2003–08.Bristol: HEFCE.
43.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (2007) Foundation Degrees: Key Statistics 2001–02 to 2006–07.The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).
44.
HouleC O, (1988) The Inquiring Mind (3rd ed.). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
45.
JamesD, (1998) Higher education field-work: The interdependence of teaching, research and student experience. In GrenfellMJamesD, (eds.) Bourdieu and Education: Acts of Practical Theory, pp. 104–121. London: Falmer Press.
46.
JaryDJonesR, (2006) Overview of widening participation policy and practice. In JaryDJonesR, (eds.) Perspectives and Practice in Widening Participation in the Social Sciences. Birmingham: C-Sap.
47.
KasperA, (1994) ‘A feminist, qualitative methodology: A study of women with breast cancer’, Qualitative Sociology, 17(3), pp. 263–281.
48.
KassemDMuftiERobinsonJ, (2006) Education Studies: Issues and Critical Perspectives.Berkshire: Open University Press.
49.
KemberD, (2001) ‘Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education26(2), pp. 205–221.
50.
KennedyK TDuthieJ H, (1975) Auxiliaries in the Classroom: A Feasibility Study in Scottish Primary Schools.Edinburgh: HMSO.
51.
KleinmanM, (2000) ‘Include me out? The new politics of place and poverty’, Policy Studies21:1, pp. 49–61.
52.
KnightJ, (2008) The Department for Children, Schools and Families speaking in Parliament in February 2008www.publications.parliament.uk/ Column 1094W.
53.
LayerG. (2004) WideningParticipation and employability. LTSN Learning and Employability Series 2 (5)www.heacademy.ac.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=20065 andprompt =yesandfilename=EMP027 Accessed 09/04/2007.
54.
LeathwoodCO'ConnellP, (2003) ‘It's a struggle: The construction of the “new” student in higher education’, Journal of Education Policy, vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 597–617.
55.
LeeB, (2002) Teaching Assistants in Schools: The Current State of Play.National Foundation for Educational Research, August 2002.
56.
LincolnY.S.GubaE.G. (2003) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. Cited in DenzinN. K.LincolnY.S., The landscape of qualitative research theories and issues.London: Sage.
57.
LomasL.TomlinsonK. (2000) Standards: The varying perceptions of senior staff in higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 8 (3): 131–139(9).
58.
MannS. J. (2001) Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and engagement. In Studies in Higher Education, 26 (1): 7–20.
59.
MannS. J. (2002) Understanding Networked Learning: A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning online. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Networked LearningLancaster University and the University of Sheffield, p. 70–75.
PascallGCoxR, (1993) Women Returning to Higher Education.Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
72.
PatelI, (2003) Literacy as Freedom for Women in India. In AksornkoolNamtip (ed.) Literacy as Freedom: A UNESCO Roundlable, pp. 121–166. Paris: Literacy and Non-formal Education Section, Division of Basic Education.
73.
PatonK, (2007) Education and Career Decision-making: Challenging the Context of Choice. In Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) Annual Conference, Brighton, UK, 12 Dec 2007. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/57682/.
74.
PeckJCoyleM, (2005) ‘Clause for thought’, Times Higher, 13 May 2005.
75.
PetersH, (2000) ‘Realising what I truly am. Mature women into higher education’, Equal Opportunities International, vol. 19, No. 2/3/4.
76.
PutnamR D, (1993) ‘The prosperous community: Social capital and public life’, American Prospect, 4:13.
77.
QAA (2005a) Report of a survey of Foundation Degrees converted from existing Higher National Diplomas since 2001 QAA 088 09/05
SchönD A, (1983) The Reflective Practitioner.New York: Basic Books.
80.
SchullerT. (2002) Age, Equality and Education. IPPR Seminar Series on Age and Equality, London.
81.
SchullerT.Brasset-GrundyA.GreenA.HammondC.PrestonJ. (2004). The benefits of learning.London: Routledge.
82.
SchultzB. D. (2008). Spectacular things happen along the way: Lessons from an urban classroom.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
83.
SkyesR(Sir) (2003) The Future of Higher Education, Fifth Report of Session 2002–03. London: Education and Skills Committee, House of Commons.
84.
SmithCAkhtarYReynoldsSTattonATuckerS, (2005) ‘A research led approach to establishing foundation degrees’, Researching Post Compulsory Education10, No. 1, pp. 27–38.
85.
SmithPWhitbyK.SharpC, (2004) The Employment and Deployment of Teaching Assistants, LGA Research Report 5/04. Slough: NFER.
86.
StakeR. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research.Sage: London.
87.
TonnerC, (2005) What are the Expectations of Professional Development for Teaching Assistants?Ultralab Ultraversity, Anglia Ruskin University.
Unison (2004) Teaching Assistants. A report on the role, pay and employment conditions of teaching assistants.London: Labour Research Department (LRD) for UNISON LRD.
90.
VincettKCreminHThomasG, (2005) Teachers and Assistants Working Together.Maidenhead: Open University Press.
91.
WagnerCbeL, (2004) Foundation Degree Task Force Report, September 2004. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
92.
YorkeMThomasL, (2003) ‘Improving the retention of students from lower socio-economic groups’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management25(1), pp. 63–74.
