Influence of segregation versus mixing: Intergroup contact and attitudes among White-British and Asian-British students in high schools in Oldham,England
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2018
Influence of segregation versus mixing: Intergroup contact and attitudes among White-British and Asian-British students in high schools in Oldham,England
We report findings from three longitudinal studies investigating the extent, quality and consequences of intergroup contact in schools between young Asian-British and White-British secondary (high-school) students. Results provide robust support for Allport’s ‘contact hypothesis’ in this setting. Specifically, mixing (vs segregation) in high schools does actually promote intergroup contact (although there is still resegregation), and contact improves attitudes and trust towards the outgroup. We conclude that faith schools, to the extent that they are segregated, deprive young people of the opportunity to mix across ethnic and religious lines during the school day; in the absence of positive contact in a safe setting, intergroup contact and especially cross-group friendships are restricted, and positive outgroup attitudes are thwarted.
AbramsDRutlandA (2008) The development of subjective group dynamics. In: LevySRKillenM (eds) Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood through Adulthood, pp. 47–65. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Al RamiahASchmidKHewstoneMet al. (2014) Why are all the White (Asian) kids sitting together in the cafeteria? Resegregation and the role of intergroup attributions and norms. British Journal of Social Psychology54: 100–124.
3.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BeckerJTauschN (2015) A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology26: 43–92.
5.
BrechwaldWAPrinsteinMJ (2011) Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence21: 166–179.
6.
BrownRHewstoneM (2005) An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 255–343.
7.
CantleT (2001) Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review. London: Home Office.
8.
BrownRHewstoneM (2005) An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 255–343.
9.
CantleT (2006) Parallel lives. Index on Censorship35: 85–90.
10.
DaviesKTroppLAronAet al. (2011) Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review15: 332–351.
11.
DovidioJFLoveASchellhaasFMet al. (2017) Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations20: 606–620.
12.
DriessenGAgirdagOMerryM (2016) The gross and net effects of primary school denomination on pupil performance. Educational Review68: 466–480.
13.
EllerAAbramsD (2003) ‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations6: 55–75.
14.
FlintJ (2007) Faith schools, multiculturalism and community cohesion: Muslim and Roman Catholic state schools in England and Scotland. Policy and Politics35: 251–268.
15.
FloeCE (2016) Contact and self-segregation in ethnically diverse schools: A multi-methodological approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford.
16.
FrenchSESeidmanEAllenLet al. (2006) The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. Developmental Psychology42: 1–10.
17.
GallagherT (2005) Balancing difference and the common good: Lessons from a post-conflict society. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education35: 429–442.
18.
GraceG (2012) Faith schools: Democracy, human rights and social cohesion. Policy Futures in Education10: 500–506.
19.
HalsteadJMMcLaughlinT (2005) Are faith schools divisive? In: GardnerRLawtonD (eds) Faith schools: Consensus or conflict? pp. 61–73. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
20.
HewstoneM (2009) Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. Proceedings of the British Academy162: 243–300.
21.
HewstoneM (2015) Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues71: 417–438.
22.
HewstoneMSwartH (2011) Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology50: 374–386.
23.
House of Commons Library (2017) Faith schools in England: FAQs. Briefing paper no. 06972, 13March. London: House of Commons Library.
24.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27: 415–444.
25.
MillerH (2001) Meeting the challenge: The Jewish schooling phenomenon in the UK. Oxford Review of Education27: 501–513.
26.
PeachC (1996) Does Britain have ghettos?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers21: 216–235.
27.
PettigrewTF (1971) Racially Separate or Together?New York: McGraw Hill.
28.
PettigrewTFHewstoneM (2017) The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review11: 8–37.
29.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90: 751–783.
30.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2011) When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. Hove; New York: Psychology Press.
31.
PhillipsD (2006) Parallel lives? Challenging discourses of British Muslim self-segregation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 25–40.
32.
RutlandAKillenMAbramsD (2010) A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science5: 280–291.
33.
SchofieldJW (1997) Resegregation.Dictionary of Multicultural Education: 234–235.
34.
ShahS (2012) Muslim schools in secular societies: Persistence or resistance!British Journal of Religious Education34: 51–65.
35.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33–48. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37.
WindzioMBicerE (2013) Are we just friends? Immigrant integration into high- and low-cost social networks. Rationality and Society25: 123–145.
38.
WölferRHewstoneMJaspersE (in press) Social contact and interethnic attitudes: The importance of contact experiences in schools. In: KalterFJonssonJOHeathAFet al. (eds) Growing Up in Diverse Europe: Integration and the Lives of Minority and Majority Youth in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. London: Proceedings of the British Academy.
39.
WölferRSchmidKHewstoneMet al. (2016) Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: Long-term effects in adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development87: 1466–1478.
