The neo-Kohlbergian model revises and extends Lawrence Kohlberg’s model of moral reasoning development to better reflect advances in research and theory. In moving from Kohlberg’s global stage model to a multi-process description of moral functioning, these modifications are most evident in the ways in which moral thinking is described, measured, and interpreted. This article highlights the two primary measurement systems of moral thinking associated with the neo-Kohlbergian perspective: measures of moral judgment development and the more recently identified intermediate concepts measures. In describing both systems, attention is given to the nature of the information supplied and evidence used to support them.
ArthurJ (2008) Traditional approaches to character education in Britain and America. In: NucciLPNarvaezD (eds) Handbook of Moral and Character Education, pp. 80–98. New York: Routledge.
2.
BebeauMThomaS (1999) Intermediate concepts and the connection to moral education. Educational Psychology Review11: 343–360.
EcclesJSLordSBuchananCM (1996) School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people? In: GraberJABrooks-GunnJPetersonA (eds) Transitions through Adolescence, pp. 251-284. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
EmlerNRenwichSMaloneB (1983) The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 1073–1080.
7.
FrichandA (2011) Examining moral thinking of adolescents through intermediate concepts. Psiholoska Istrazivanja14: 67–84.
8.
KingPMMayhewMJ (2002) Moral judgment development in higher education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education31: 247–270.
9.
KohlbergL (1969) Stage and sequence. The cognitive- developmental approach to socialization. In: GoslinDA (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, pp. 347–380. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
10.
LickonaT (1991) Educating for Character. New York: Bantam.
11.
NarvaezDGetzIThomaSJ. (1999) Orthodoxy, progressivism and development of moral judgment. Developmental Psychology35: 478–488.
12.
PascarellaETTerenziniPT (2005) How College Affects Students A Third Decade of Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
PiagetJ (1932/1965) The Moral Judgment of the Child (trans. GabainM). New York: Free Press.
14.
RestJ (1979) Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
15.
RestJ (1983) Morality. In: MussenPH (ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognitive Development, vol. 3 (edited by FlavellJMarkmanE), 4th edn, pp. 556–629. New York: Wiley.
16.
RestJR (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
RestJRNarvaezD (1994) Moral Development in the professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
RestJRNarvaezDBebeauM. (1999) Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
RocheCThomaSJWingfieldJ (2014) From workshop to e-learning: Using technology-enhanced ‘Intermediate Concept Measure’ as a framework for pharmacy ethics education and assessment. Pharmacy2014(2): 137–160. DOI:10.3390/pharmacy2020137.
20.
StrikeKA (1982) Educational Policy and the Just Society. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
21.
ThomaSJ (1986) Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review6: 165–180.
22.
ThomaSJ (2006) Research using the Defining Issues Test. In: KillenMSmetanaJG (eds) Handbook of Moral Psychology, pp. 67-92. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
ThomaSJBarnettRRestJR. (1999a) Political identity and moral judgment development using the Defining Issues Test. British Journal of Social Psychology38: 103–111.
24.
ThomaSJBebeauMDongY (in preparation) Is moral judgment competency declining over time? Evidence from thirty years of Defining Issues Test data.
25.
ThomaSJDerryberryPCrowsonHM (2013) Describing and testing an intermediate concept measure of adolescent moral thinking (special issue). European Journal of Developmental Psychology10: 239–252.
26.
ThomaSJNarvaezDRestJ. (1999b) Does moral judgment development reduce to political attitudes or verbal ability: Evidence using the Defining Issues Test?Review of Educational Psychology11: 325–342.
27.
TurielE (2006) The development of morality (revised edition). In: DamonWLernerRM (eds) Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, vol. 3 (edited by EisenbergN), 6th edn, pp. 863- 932New York: Wiley.
28.
WalkerL (2002) The model and the measure: An appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development. Journal of Moral Education31: 353–367.
