This article examines the narrative structure used by Israeli history teachers in their lessons. The investigation makes use of the analytical tools of narratology, employing the constitutive narratological distinction between fabula and szujet. It becomes clear that the narrative structure which teachers of history commonly use impedes their ability to prepare lessons which interest their pupils. The article proposes that history teachers adopt a different narrative structure, which may captivate their pupils and arouse greater interest in learning history.
AnkersmitF (1994) History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
Avieli-TabibianK (2001) 1970–1980 The Age of Horror and Hope: Chapters in History for Grades 10–12. Tel-Aviv: Centre of Educational Technologies. (Hebrew)
3.
BarthesR (1989) The reality effect. In: The Rustle of Language, trans. HowardR, pp. 141–148. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
BrinkerM (1980) Through the Imaginary: Meanings and Representations in Fictional Literature. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute of Poetics and Semiotics, University of Tel Aviv, Hakibbutz Hameuchad. (Hebrew)
5.
CarrD (1986) Time, Narrative, and History. London: Bloomington.
6.
CohnD (1999) The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
EhrlichM (1970) What kills thinking in history lessons. In: LamishP (ed.) Theories of History Teaching, pp. 29–39. Kiryat Tivon: Oranim. (Hebrew)
8.
EvansR (1997) In Defence of History. London: Granta Books.
9.
ForsterM [1962 (1927)] Aspects of the Novel. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
10.
HoodlessP (2002) Children’s awareness of time in story and historical fiction. In: HoodlessP (ed.) History and English in the Primary School, pp. 103–115. New York: Routledge.
11.
IggersGG (1997) Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
12.
JakobsonR [1971 (1921)] On realism in art. In: MatejkaLPomorskaK (eds) Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, pp. 38–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
JeffersonA (1988) Russian formalism. In: JeffersonARobeyD (eds) Modern Literary Theory, pp. 24–45. London: Batsford.
14.
MartinW (1986) Recent Theories of Narrative. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
15.
Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (1995) History Curriculum for 7th–9th Grades in Public Schools. Jerusalem: Curriculum Department, Ministry of Education. (Hebrew)
16.
PerryM (1979) The dynamics of the literary text. Hasifrut (Literature) 28: 6–46. (Hebrew)
17.
RicoeurP (1983–8) Time and Narrative, 3 vols, trans. McLaughlinKPellauerD. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Rimmon-KemanS (1983) Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London and New York: Routledge.
19.
SegevT (2001) One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate. London: Abacus.
20.
SternbergM (1974)The structure of postponement, plot interest and the detective story. Hasifrut (Literature) 18/19: 163–180. (Hebrew)
21.
StowWTerryH (2000) Issues in the teaching of chronology. In: ArthurJPhillipsR (eds) Issues in History Teaching, pp. 83–97. London and New York: Routledge.
22.
TomashevskyB (1965 [1925]) Thematics. In: Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, trans. LemonLTReisMJ. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
23.
WhiteH (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
WhiteH (1987) The Content of Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.