Educational standards, assessments, and accountability systems are of immense political moment around the world. But there is no developed theory exploring the role that these systems should play within a democratic polity in particular. On the one hand, well-designed standards are public goods, supported by assessment and accountability mechanisms. They have the potential to serve democratic goods in particular, such as transparency, equality, and public discourse. On the other hand, their very potential to advance systemic democratic goods signals a level of reach and power that threatens the achievement of these same democratic values along other dimensions. This is especially evident in the contemporary United States. Adults’ democratically legitimate control over education within a democracy may well undercut children’s legitimate claims to receiving an education that equips them for democracy. Because the latter should trump the former, democratic goods are best achieved through embedding very limited educational standards, assessments, and accountability measures within an educational system that selects, trains, and provides ongoing support to civically engaged and thoughtful educators. Under such circumstances, they may promote a virtuous circle that builds capacity, motivation, and public support for strong and effective civic education practices, while still offering the adult public a strong democratic voice in public schools.
Archbald D. and Newmann F. ( 1988) Beyond Standardized Testing: Assessing Authentic Achievement in the Secondary School. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
2.
Behn RD ( 2003) Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review63(5): 556-76.
3.
Carter P. ( 2005) Keepin’ It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Cross Jr WE, Strauss L. and Fhagen-Smith P. ( 1999) African-American identity development across the life span: educational implications. In: RH Sheets and ER Hollins (eds) Racial and Ethnic Identity in School Practices: Aspects of Human Development , pp. 29-47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Curren RR ( 2004) Educational measurement and knowledge of other minds. Theory and Research in Education2(3): 235-53.
6.
Darling-Hammond L. ( 2004) From ‘Separate But Equal’ to ‘No Child Left Behind’: The collision of new standards and old inequalities. In: D Meier and G Wood (eds) Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools, pp. 3-32. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
7.
Delpit L. ( 1995) Other People’s Children. New York: The New Press.
8.
Delpit L and Dowdy JK , eds (2002) The Skin That We Speak: Thoughts on Language and Culture in the Classroom. New York: The New Press.
9.
Dillon E. ( 2009) Moving Targets: What It Now Means to Make ‘Adequate Yearly Progress’ Under NCLB. Washington DC: Education Sector.
10.
Elmore RF ( 2005) Agency, reciprocity, and accountability in democratic education. In: S Fuhrman and M Lazerson (eds) The Public Schools, pp. 277-301. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Freire Charter School (2010) Freire Charter School Home. Available at http://www.freirecharterschool.org/index.htm (accessed 3 March 2010).
12.
Fuhrman S and Elmore R, eds (2004) Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education . New York: Teachers College Press .
13.
Fung A. ( 2004) Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Gutmann A. ( 1987) Democratic Education. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
15.
Herman J. ( 2003) The effects of testing on instruction. In: S Furhman and R Elmore (eds) Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education, pp. 141-66. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Hess DE ( 2009) Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York: Routledge .
17.
Koretz D. ( 2008) Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Ladson-Billings G. ( 2006) From the achievement gap to the education debt: understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher35(3): 3-12.
19.
Levinson M. ( 1999) The Demands of Liberal Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Levinson M. ( 2003) Challenging deliberation. Theory and Research in Education1(1): 23-49.
21.
Levinson M. ( 2010) The civic empowerment gap: defining the problem and locating solutions. In: LR Sherrod, J Torney-Purta and CA Flanagan (eds) Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth , pp. 331-61. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
22.
Linn RR ( 2000) Assessments and Accountability. Educational Researcher29(2): 4-16.
23.
Meier D. ( 2003) So what does it take to build a school for democracy? Phi Delta Kappan85(1): 15-21.
24.
Moe TM ( 2000) The two democratic purposes of public education. In: LM McDonnell, PM Timpane and R Benjamin (eds) Rediscovering the Democratic Purposes of Education, pp. 127-47. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
25.
Nash GB, Crabtree C. and Dunn RE ( 2000) History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past. New York: Vintage.
26.
Oakes J. ( 2005) Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Powell AG, Farrar E. and Cohen DK ( 1985) The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. New York, Houghton Mifflin.
Reuben J. ( 2005) Patriotic Purposes: Public Schools and the Education of Citizens. In: S Fuhrman and M Lazerson (eds) The Public Schools, pp. 1-24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Sacks P. ( 2000) Standardized Minds: The High Price of America’s Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo.
31.
Sleeter CE ( 2005) Un-Standardizing Curriculum: Multicultural Teaching in the Standards-Based Classroom. New York, Teachers College Press.
32.
Stein JG ( 2001) The Cult of Efficiency. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.
33.
Strike KA ( 2011) Ethics in urban educational accountability. In: Gallagher K, R Goodyear, D Brewer and R Rueda (eds) Urban Education: A Model for Leadership and Policy, Chapter 20. New York: Routledge .
34.
Students and Faculty of The New School (2010 ) Panel Discussion: Alternatives in Schooling (Kennebunkport, Maine). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
35.
Surowiecki J. ( 2005) The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Random House.
36.
The New School (2010) The New School - Curriculum. Available at http://www.tnsk.org/TNS/curriculum.htm (accessed 22 July 2010).
37.
Toch T. ( 2006) Margins of Error: The Education Testing Industry in the No Child Left Behind Era. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
38.
Tyack D. ( 2001) School for citizens: The politics of civic education from 1790 to 1990. In: G Gerstle and J Mollenkopf (eds) E Pluribus Unum? Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation, pp. 331-70. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
Tyack D. and Cuban L. ( 1995) Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Ulluci K. and Spencer J.(2009) Unraveling the myths of accountability: A case study of the California High School Exit Exam. The Urban Review41: 161-73.
41.
Wasserman S. ( 2001) Quantum theory, the uncertainty principle, and the alchemy of standardized testing. Phi Delta Kappan83(1): 28-40.
42.
Wiley EW, Mathis WJ and Garcia DR ( 2005) The Impact of the Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of the Federal ‘No Child Left Behind’ Act on Schools in the Great Lakes Region. Boulder, CO: National Edcuation Policy Center.
43.
Winerip M. ( 2006) Standardized tests face a crisis over standards. New York Times, 22 March.
