All aspects of daily living frequently involve the use of plastics. Due to the lack of effective waste treatment methods, massive global environmental problems will be caused by the accumulation of waste plastics. The use of waste materials in road building is of tremendous interest since it has the potential to reduce hazards and pollution while conserving natural resources. High-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA), and polyvinyl chloride are the most appropriate and relevant of waste plastics. There are other types of waste materials used in the asphalt such as reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), crumb rubber (CR), steel slag, glass powder etc. These all-waste materials have been briefly discussed. In this review article several concerns have been raised about the physical and chemical qualities, of asphalt pavements that have been mixed with waste materials. Using waste materials in asphalt pavements can raise several concerns regarding the physical and chemical qualities of the resulting mixtures. These concerns typically revolve around factors such as durability, performance, environmental impact, and overall sustainability. This research article provides a thorough analysis of the wet and dry procedures used to mix different types of waste plastics. Overall, including waste plastics into asphalt mix improved rutting, fatigue, and moisture resistance. Additionally, recycling waste plastics in this manner helps in reducing environmental pollution and conserving natural resources. Overall, the inclusion of waste plastics in asphalt mixtures can contribute to the development of more sustainable and durable pavements with improved performance in terms of rutting, fatigue, and moisture resistance. There are still certain issues like compatibility and low temperature performances that need to be addressed. To overcome the aforementioned issues, many strategies are used, including the use of nanomaterials, chemical additives, and polymer additives. Additional research should be conducted to investigate the ageing effect, pavement performance monitoring, polymer stability, and the economic and environmental considerations associated with the usage of plastics in asphalt pavements.
CostaLMBSilvaHMRDOliveiraJRM, et al.Incorporation of waste plastic in asphalt binders to improve their performance in the pavement. Int J Pavement Res Technol2013; 6: 457–464.
2.
MoghaddamTBKarimMRAbdelazizM. A review on fatigue and rutting performance of asphalt mixes. Sci Res Essays2011; 6: 670–682.
3.
AngeloneSCauhapé CasauxMBorghiM, et al.Green pavements: reuse of plastic waste in asphalt mixtures. Mater Struct2016; 49: 1655–1665.
4.
AhmadiniaEZargarMKarimMR, et al.Performance evaluation of utilization of waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt. Construct Build Mater2012; 36: 984–989.
5.
TayfurSOzenHAksoyA. Investigation of rutting performance of asphalt mixtures containing polymer modifiers. Construct Build Mater2007; 21: 328–337.
6.
ChiuCTLuLC. A laboratory study on stone matrix asphalt using ground tire rubber. Construct Build Mater2007; 21: 1027–1033.
7.
OliveiraJRMSilvaHMRDAbreuLPF, et al.Effect of different production conditions on the quality of hot recycled asphalt mixtures. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci2012; 53: 266–275.
8.
AsiIM. Laboratory comparison study for the use of stone matrix asphalt in hot weather climates. Construct Build Mater2006; 20: 982–989.
9.
ChoBHNamBHAnJ, et al.Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ashes as construction materials-a review. Materials2020; 13: 1–30.
10.
IsmailZZAL-HashmiEA. Use of waste plastic in concrete mixture as aggregate replacement. Waste Manag2008; 28: 2041–2047.
11.
AiAYi-qiuTHameedAT. Starch as a modifier for asphalt paving materials. Construct Build Mater2011; 25: 14–20.
12.
MaYZhouHJiangX, et al.The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: a review. Clean Mater2021; 2: 100031.
13.
HuangYBirdRNHeidrichO. A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resour Conserv Recycl2007; 52: 58–73.
14.
PouranianMRShishehborM. Sustainability assessment of green asphalt mixtures: a review. Environ - MDPI2019; 6: 73.
15.
Lo PrestiD. Recycled tyre rubber modified bitumens for road asphalt mixtures: a literature review. Construct Build Mater2013; 49: 863–881.
16.
BehnoodA. A review of the warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies: effects on thermo-mechanical and rheological properties. J Clean Prod2020; 259: 120817.
17.
AljassarAHAl-FadalaKBAliMA. Recycling building demolition waste in hot-mix asphalt concrete: a case study in Kuwait. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag2005; 7: 112–115.
18.
MashaanNSAliAHKarimMR, et al.A review on using crumb rubber in reinforcement of asphalt pavement. Sci World J2014; 2014: 21.
19.
PoulikakosLDPapadaskalopoulouCHofkoB, et al.Harvesting the unexplored potential of European waste materials for road construction. Resour Conserv Recycl2017; 116: 32–44.
20.
IftikharSShahPMMirMS. Potential application of various nanomaterials on the performance of asphalt binders and mixtures: a comprehensive review. Int J Pavement Res Technol2022; 16: 1439–1467. DOI: 10.1007/s42947-022-00207-5.
21.
CongLYangFGuoG, et al.The use of polyurethane for asphalt pavement engineering applications: a state-of-the-art review. Construct Build Mater2019; 225: 1012–1025.
22.
ImtiazALovellCW. Use of waste materials in highway construction: state of the practice and evaluation of the selected waste products. Trasnportation Res Rec. 1994; 1345: 919–927.
23.
ReichMJWoernALTanikellaNG, et al.Mechanical properties and applications of recycled polycarbonate particle material extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Materials2019; 12: 1642.
24.
AppiahJKBerko-BoatengVNTagborTA. Use of waste plastic materials for road construction in Ghana. Case Stud Constr Mater2017; 6: 1–7.
25.
MansourianAGoahriARKhosrowshahiFK. Performance evaluation of asphalt binder modified with EVA/HDPE/nanoclay based on linear and non-linear viscoelastic behaviors. Construct Build Mater2019; 208: 554–563.
GonzálezOPeñaJJMuñozME, et al.Rheological techniques as a tool to analyze polymer-bitumen interactions: bitumen modified with polyethylene and polyethylene-based blends. Energy Fuel2002; 16: 1256–1263.
28.
BressiSFiorentiniNHuangJ, et al.Crumb rubber modifier in road asphalt pavements: state of the art and statistics. Coatings2019; 9: 384.
29.
LiuSZhouSBPengA, et al.Analysis of the performance and mechanism of desulfurized rubber and low-density polyethylene compound-modified asphalt. J Appl Polym Sci2019; 136: 1–10.
30.
JamshidiAWhiteG. Evaluation of performance and challenges of use of waste materials in pavement construction: a critical review. Appl Sci2020; 10: 226.
31.
Mohi Ud DinIMirMS. Study of warm mix asphalt using reclaimed asphalt pavement and copper slag: a review. Can J Civ Eng2020; 47: 355–362.
32.
PérezIPasandínARMedinaL. Hot mix asphalt using C&D waste as coarse aggregates. Mater Des2012; 36: 840–846.
33.
FeiAZhangTRuanZ. Research on road performance of asphalt mixture with iron waste ore. Res Sq. 2021. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-764296/v1License.
34.
NeduriPSahithiGGollaSY, et al.Strength evaluation of glass powder impregnated asphalt mix. Mater Today Proc2020; 39: 771–775.
35.
KumarHVarmaS. A review on utilization of steel slag in hot mix asphalt. Int J Pavement Res Technol2020; 14: 232–242.
36.
SharmaDKSwamiBLVyasAK. Performance evaluation of hot mix asphalt containing copper slag. Mater Today Proc2021; 38: 1241–1244.
37.
ModarresARamyarHAyarP. Effect of cement kiln dust on the low-temperature durability and fatigue life of hot mix asphalt. Cold Reg Sci Technol2015; 110: 59–66.
38.
MistryRKarmakarSKumar RoyT. Experimental evaluation of rice husk ash and fly ash as alternative fillers in hot-mix asphalt. Road Mater Pavement Des2019; 20: 979–990.
39.
JiaXHuangBMooreJA, et al.Influence of waste engine oil on asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. J Mater Civ Eng2015; 27: 1–9.
40.
SiddiqueR. Recycled/waste plastic. In Waste materials and by-products in concrete. Berlin: Springer, 2007, pp. 93–120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74294-4_3.
41.
SiddiqueR. Foundry sand. In: Waste materials and by-products in concrete. Berlin: Springer, 2007, pp. 381–406. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74294-4_12.
42.
ShahPMMirMS. Performance of OMMT/SBS on the rheological properties of asphalt binder. Korea Aust Rheol J2020; 32: 235–242.
43.
ShahPMMirMS. Effect of kaolinite clay/SBS on rheological performance of asphalt binder. Innov Infrastruct Solut2020; 5: 21.
44.
DessoukySContrerasDSanchezJ, et al.Influence of hindered phenol additives on the rheology of aged polymer-modified bitumen. Construct Build Mater2013; 38: 214–223.
45.
Baghaee MoghaddamTKarimMRSyammaunT. Dynamic properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures containing waste plastic bottles. Construct Build Mater2012; 34: 236–242.
46.
ChenYCuiZCuiX, et al.Life cycle assessment of end-of-life treatments of waste plastics in China. Resour Conserv Recycl2019; 146: 348–357.
47.
LindbergHKVäänänenVJärventausH, et al.Genotoxic effects of fumes from asphalt modified with waste plastic and tall oil pitch. Mutat Res2008; 653: 82–90.
48.
LiJXiaoFZhangL, et al.Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: a review. J Clean Prod2019; 233: 1182–1206.
49.
LazarevicDAoustinEBucletN, et al.Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl2010; 55: 246–259.
50.
Al-Abdul WahhabHIDalhatMAHabibMA. Storage stability and high-temperature performance of asphalt binder modified with recycled plastic. Road Mater Pavement Des2017; 18: 1117–1134.
51.
KarahrodiMHJazaniOMParanSMR, et al.Modification of thermal and rheological characteristics of bitumen by waste PET/GTR blends. Construct Build Mater2017; 134: 157–166.
52.
KamadaOYamadaM. Utilization of waste plastics in asphalt mixtures. Osaka City Univ2002; 43: 111–118.
53.
El-BadawySMGabrAREl-HakimRTA. Recycled materials and by-products for pavement construction. Handb Ecomater. 2018; 1–22. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_168-1.
54.
QianCFanWRenF, et al.Influence of polyphosphoric acid (PPA) on properties of crumb rubber (CR) modified asphalt. Construct Build Mater2019; 227: 117094.
55.
LiangMRenSSunC, et al.Extruded tire crumb-rubber recycled polyethylene melt blend as asphalt composite additive for enhancing the performance of binder. J Mater Civ Eng2020; 32: 1–10.
56.
HassaniAGanjidoustHMaghanakiAA. Use of plastic waste (poly-ethylene terephthalate) in asphalt concrete mixture as aggregate replacement. Waste Manag Res2005; 23: 322–327.
57.
FangCLiTZhangZ, et al.Combined modification of asphalt by waste PE and rubber. Polym Polym Compos2008; 16: 101–113.
58.
AttaelmananMFengCPAiAH. Laboratory evaluation of HMA with high density polyethylene as a modifier. Construct Build Mater2011; 25: 2764–2770.
59.
MashaanNSAliAHKarimMR, et al.Effect of crumb rubber concentration on the physical and rheological properties of rubberised bitumen binders. Int J Phys Sci2011; 6: 684–690.
60.
MashaanNSAliAHSuhanaK, et al. Performance evaluation of crumb rubber modified stone mastic asphalt pavement in Malaysia. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013; 8: 1–8.
61.
Moreno-NavarroFPérez-MartínezMMartín-MarínJ, et al.Mechanical performance of asphalt mixes incorporating waste glass. Baltic J Road Bridge Eng2015; 10: 255–261.
62.
ArabaniMTahamiSAHamediGH. Performance evaluation of dry process crumb rubber-modified asphalt mixtures with nanomaterial. Road Mater Pavement Des2018; 19: 1241–1258.
63.
WhiteG. Evaluating recycled waste plastic modification and extension of bituminous binder for asphalt. Eighteenth Annu Int Conf Pavement Eng Asph Technol Infrastruct2019; 1: 1–14.
64.
LiQQiuYRahmanA, et al.Application of steel slag powder to enhance the low-temperature fracture properties of asphalt mastic and its corresponding mechanism. J Clean Prod2018; 184: 21–31.
65.
AmeliABabagoliRAsadiS, et al.Investigation of the performance properties of asphalt binders and mixtures modified by crumb rubber and gilsonite. Construct Build Mater2021; 279: 122424.
66.
AntunesVFreireACNevesJ. A review on the effect of RAP recycling on bituminous mixtures properties and the viability of multi-recycling. Construct Build Mater2019; 211: 453–469.
67.
Dinis-AlmeidaMCastro-GomesJAntunesML. Mechanical performance and economic evaluation of warm mix recycling asphalt. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci2012; 53: 286–296.
68.
SilvaHMRDOliveiraJRMJesusCMG. Are totally recycled hot mix asphalts a sustainable alternative for road paving?Resour Conserv Recycl2012; 60: 38–48.
69.
ZaumanisMMallickRBFrankR. 100% recycled hot mix asphalt: a review and analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl2014; 92: 230–245.
70.
DanielJSLachanceA. Mechanistic and volumetric properties of asphalt mixtures with recycled asphalt pavement. Transport Res Rec2005; 1929: 28–36. DOI: 10.3141/1929-04.
71.
ElkashefMWilliamsRC. Improving fatigue and low temperature performance of 100% RAP mixtures using a soybean-derived rejuvenator. Construct Build Mater2017; 151: 345–352.
72.
ShuXHuangBVukosavljevicD. Laboratory evaluation of fatigue characteristics of recycled asphalt mixture. Construct Build Mater2008; 22: 1323–1330.
73.
LengZSreeramAPadhanRK, et al.Value-added application of waste PET based additives in bituminous mixtures containing high percentage of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). J Clean Prod2018; 196: 615–625.
74.
ZiariHAlihaMRMMoniriA, et al.Crack resistance of hot mix asphalt containing different percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement and glass fiber. Construct Build Mater2020; 230: 117015.
75.
MartinhoFCGPicado-SantosLGCapitãoSD. Mechanical properties of warm-mix asphalt concrete containing different additives and recycled asphalt as constituents applied in real production conditions. Construct Build Mater2017; 131: 78–89.
76.
MakriCHahladakisJNGidarakosE. Use and assessment of “e-plastics” as recycled aggregates in cement mortar. J Hazard Mater2019; 379: 120776.
SarangGLekhaBMShankarAUR. Stone matrix asphalt using aggregates modified with waste plastics. Pavement Materials, Structures, and Performance. 2014; 9: 9–18. doi:10.1061/9780784413418.002.
79.
RebeizKSCraftAP. Plastic waste management in construction: technological and institutional issues. Resour Conserv Recycl1995; 15: 245–257.
80.
KöfteciSAhmedzadePKultayevB. Performance evaluation of bitumen modified by various types of waste plastics. Construct Build Mater2014; 73: 592–602.
81.
RanieriMCostaLOliveiraJRM, et al.Asphalt surface mixtures with improved performance using waste polymers via dry and wet processes. J Mater Civ Eng2017; 29: 1–9.
82.
KarmakarSMajhiDRoyTK, et al.Moisture damage analysis of bituminous mix by durability index utilizing waste plastic cup. J Mater Civ Eng2018; 30: 1–12.
83.
GhaniUZaminBTariq BashirM, et al.Comprehensive study on the performance of waste HDPE and LDPE modified asphalt binders for construction of asphalt pavements application. Polymers2022; 14: 3673.
84.
Abd El-RahmanAMMEl-ShafieMMohammedyMM, et al.Enhancing the performance of blown asphalt binder using waste EVA copolymer (WEVA). Egypt. J. Pet2018; 27: 513–521.
85.
AhmadiniaEZargarMKarimMR, et al.Using waste plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt. Mater Des2011; 32: 4844–4849.
86.
SojobiAONwobodoSEAladegboyeOJ. Recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottle wastes in bituminous asphaltic concrete. Cogent Eng2016; 3: 1133480.
87.
RahmanWMNWAWahabAFA. Green pavement using recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) as partial fine aggregate replacement in modified asphalt. Procedia Eng2013; 53: 124–128.
88.
LiangMXinXFanW, et al.Phase behavior and hot storage characteristics of asphalt modified with various polyethylene: experimental and numerical characterizations. Construct Build Mater2019; 203: 608–620.
89.
AwwadMTShbeebL. The use of polyethylene in hot asphalt mixtures. Am J Appl Sci2007; 4: 390–396.
90.
HoSChurchRKlassenK, et al.Study of recycled polyethylene materials as asphalt modifiers. Can J Civ Eng2006; 33: 968–981.
91.
Pérez-LepeAMartínez-BozaFJGallegosC. Influence of polymer concentration on the microstructure and rheological properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE)-modified bitumen. Energy Fuel2005; 19: 1148–1152.
92.
KhanIMKabirSAlhussainMA, et al.Asphalt design using recycled plastic and crumb-rubber waste for sustainable pavement construction. Procedia Eng2016; 145: 1557–1564.
93.
PunithVSVeeraragavanA. Behavior of reclaimed polyethylene modified asphalt cement for paving purposes. J Mater Civ Eng2011; 23: 833–845.
94.
CostaLMBSilvaHMRDPeraltaJ, et al.Using waste polymers as a reliable alternative for asphalt binder modification – performance and morphological assessment. Construct Build Mater2019; 198: 237–244.
95.
DuZJiangCYuanJ, et al.Low temperature performance characteristics of polyethylene modified asphalts – a review. Construct Build Mater2020; 264: 120704.
96.
TapkinS. The effect of polypropylene fibers on asphalt performance. Build Environ2008; 43: 1065–1071.
97.
OthmanAM. Impact of polypropylene application method on long-term aging of polypropylene-modified HMA. J Mater Civ Eng2010; 22: 1012–1018.
98.
AhmedzadePDemirelliKGünayT, et al.Effects of waste polypropylene additive on the properties of bituminous binder. Procedia Manuf2015; 2: 165–170.
99.
Al-HadidyAIYi-qiuT. Mechanistic approach for polypropylene-modified flexible pavements. Mater Des2009; 30: 1133–1140.
100.
GonzálezOMuñozMSantamariaA, et al.Rheology and stability of bitumen/EVA blends. Eur Polym J2004; 40: 2365–2372.
101.
YuliestyanACuadriAAGarcía-MoralesM, et al.Influence of polymer melting point and Melt Flow Index on the performance of ethylene-vinyl-acetate modified bitumen for reduced-temperature application. Mater Des2016; 96: 180–188.
102.
SureshkumarMSFilippiSPolaccoG, et al.Internal structure and linear viscoelastic properties of EVA/asphalt nanocomposites. Eur Polym J2010; 46: 621–633.
103.
SinghMKumarPMauryaMR. Effect of aggregate types on the performance of neat and EVA-modified asphalt mixtures. Int J Pavement Eng2014; 15: 163–173.
104.
SiddigEAAFengCPMingLY. Effects of ethylene vinyl acetate and nanoclay additions on high-temperature performance of asphalt binders. Construct Build Mater2018; 169: 276–282.
105.
SengozBIsikyakarG. Evaluation of the properties and microstructure of SBS and EVA polymer modified bitumen. Construct Build Mater2008; 22: 1897–1905.
106.
BehlASharmaGKumarG. A sustainable approach: utilization of waste PVC in asphalting of roads. Construct Build Mater2014; 54: 113–117.
107.
Nobinur RahmanMAhmeduzzamanMSobhanMA, et al.T. Performance evaluation of waste polyethylene and PVC on hot asphalt mixtures. Am J Civ Eng Architect2013; 1: 97–102.
108.
JaidevKSureshSSGohatreOK, et al.Development of recycled blends based on cables and wires with plastic cabinets: an effective solution for value addition of hazardous waste plastics. Waste Manag Res2020; 38: 312–321.
109.
ZiariHNasiriEAminiA, et al.The effect of EAF dust and waste PVC on moisture sensitivity, rutting resistance, and fatigue performance of asphalt binders and mixtures. Construct Build Mater2019; 203: 188–200.
110.
SalmanNJaleelZ. Effects of waste PVC addition on the properties of (40–50) grade asphalt. MATEC Web Conf2018; 162: 1–4.
111.
MashaanNChegenizadehANikrazH. Laboratory properties of waste PET plastic-modified asphalt mixes. Recycling2021; 6: 1–13.
112.
AmeriMNasrD. Properties of asphalt modified with devulcanized polyethylene terephthalate. Petrol Sci Technol2016; 34: 1424–1430.
113.
EsfandabadASMotevalizadehSMSedghiR, et al.Fracture and mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures containing granular polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Construct Build Mater2020; 259: 120410.
114.
LengCLuGGaoJ, et al.Sustainable green pavement using bio-based polyurethane binder in tunnel. Materials2019; 12: 1–15.
115.
KalantarZNKarimMRMahrezA. A review of using waste and virgin polymer in pavement. Construct Build Mater2012; 33: 55–62.
116.
Mohd HasanMRColbertBYouZ, et al.A simple treatment of electronic-waste plastics to produce asphalt binder additives with improved properties. Construct Build Mater2016; 110: 79–88.
117.
Lastra-GonzálezPCalzada-PérezMACastro-FresnoD, et al.Comparative analysis of the performance of asphalt concretes modified by dry way with polymeric waste. Construct Build Mater2016; 112: 1133–1140.
118.
VargasMAVargasMASánchez-SólisA, et al.Asphalt/polyethylene blends: rheological properties, microstructure and viscosity modeling. Construct Build Mater2013; 45: 243–250.
119.
AhmedzadePDemirelliKGünayT, et al.Effects of waste polypropylene additive on the properties of bituminous binder. Procedia Manuf2015; 2: 165–170.
120.
ChengYFuQFangC, et al.Preparation, structure, and properties of modified asphalt with waste packaging polypropylene and organic rectorite. Adv Mater Sci Eng2019; 2019: 1–9.
121.
CuadriAAPartalPAhmadN, et al.Chemically modified bitumens with enhanced rheology and adhesion properties to siliceous aggregates. Construct Build Mater2015; 93: 766–774.
122.
XuFZhaoYLiK. Using waste plastics as asphalt modifier: a review. Materials2022; 15: 110.
123.
MashaanNSAliAHKarimMR, et al.An overview of crumb rubber modified asphalt. Int J Phys Sci2012; 7: 166–170.
124.
BhoiRDesaiRPatelBD. Double layer rubberised concrete paving block. Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ2016; 2: 231–234.
125.
ZhuHCarlsonDD. A spray based crumb rubber technology in highway noise reduction application. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, USA, 1999: 815–822.
126.
ZiariHGoliAAminiA. Effect of crumb rubber modifier on the performance properties of rubberized binders. J Mater Civ Eng2016; 28: 1–9.
127.
HughesACS. Feasibility of using recycled glass in asphalt, 1990, pp. 687–718.
128.
BalasubramanianBGopala KrishnaGVTSaraswathyV, et al.Experimental investigation on concrete partially replaced with waste glass powder and waste E-plastic. Construct Build Mater2021; 278: 122400.
129.
ChenXXuZ. Feasibility of using recycled glass in asphalt. Geotech Spec Publ2007; 1: 2234–2239.
130.
State of California Department of Transportation. Asphalt rubber usage guide. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Transportation, 2006.
131.
LiMZhangMRongH, et al.Transport and deposition of plastic particles in porous media during seawater intrusion and groundwater-seawater displacement processes. Sci Total Environ2021; 781: 146752.
132.
Movilla-QuesadaDRaposeirasACSilva-KleinLT, et al.Use of plastic scrap in asphalt mixtures added by dry method as a partial substitute for bitumen. Waste Manag2019; 87: 751–760.
133.
WhiteGMageeC. Laboratory evaluation of asphalt containing recycled plastic as a bitumen extender and modifier. J Traffic Transport Eng2019; 7: 218–235.
134.
ChavezFMarcobalJGallegoJ. Laboratory evaluation of the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures with rubber incorporated by the wet, dry, and semi-wet process. Construct Build Mater2019; 205: 164–174.
135.
BabalghaithAMKotingSRamli SulongNH, et al.Optimization of mixing time for polymer modified asphalt. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2019; 512: 1–8.
136.
FangCWuCHuJ, et al.Pavement properties of asphalt modified with packaging-waste polyethylene. J Vinyl Addit Technol2014; 20: 31–35.
137.
DalhatMAAl-Abdul WahhabHIAl-AdhamK. Recycled plastic waste asphalt concrete via mineral aggregate substitution and binder modification. J Mater Civ Eng2019; 31: 2–11.
138.
TaylorPKumarPGargR. Rheology of waste plastic fibre-modified bitumen. International J Pavement Eng. 2011; 12: 37–41.
139.
ModarresAHamediH. Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes. Mater Des2014; 61: 8–15.
140.
LinYHuCAdhikariS, et al.Evaluation of waste express bag as a novel bitumen modifier. Appl Sci2019; 9: 1242.
141.
ChenJSSunYCLiaoMC, et al.Effect of binder types on engineering properties and performance of porous asphalt concrete. Transport Res Rec2012; 2293: 55–62. DOI: 10.3141/2293-07.
142.
González-TorrePLAdenso-DíazBRuiz-TorresA. Some comparative factors regarding recycling collection systems in regions of the USA and Europe. J Environ Manag2003; 69: 129–138.
143.
RossiCOCaputoPAshimovaSFabozziSD’ErricoGAngelicoREffects of natural antioxidant agents on the bitumen aging process: an EPR and rheological investigation. Appl Sci2018; 8: 1405.
144.
SinghBGuptaMKumarL. Bituminous polyurethane network: preparation, properties, and end use. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 101: 217–226.
145.
YazdaniAGedafaDEffect of nanopolymer modified binder on hot mix asphalt. Int Conf Transp Dev 2022 Appl Emerg Technol - Sel Pap from Proc Int Conf Transp Dev2022; 5: 190–200.
146.
YuBGuXNiF, et al.Multi-objective optimization for asphalt pavement maintenance plans at project level: integrating performance, cost and environment. Transport Res Transport Environ2015; 41: 64–74.
147.
RojoEFernándezMPeñaJJ, et al.Rheological aspects of blends of metallocene-catalyzed atactic polypropylenes with bitumen. Polym Eng Sci2004; 44: 1792–1799.
148.
HanZShaATongZ, et al.Study on the optimum rice husk ash content added in asphalt binder and its modification with bio-oil. Construct Build Mater2017; 147: 776–789.
149.
KakarMRMikhailenkoPPiaoZ, et al.Analysis of waste polyethylene (PE) and its by-products in asphalt binder. Construct Build Mater2021; 280: 122492.
150.
PlatiCCliattB. Building sustainable pavements: investigating the effectiveness of recycled tire rubber as a modifier in asphalt mixtures. Energies2021; 14: 7099.
151.
CaoW. Study on properties of recycled tire rubber modified asphalt mixtures using dry process. Construct Build Mater2007; 21: 1011–1015.
152.
BabagoliRMohammadiRAmeriM. The rheological behavior of bitumen and moisture susceptibility modified with SBS and nanoclay. Petrol Sci Technol2017; 35: 1085–1090.
153.
ZoorobSSuparmaLB. Laboratory design and investigation of the properties of continuously graded asphaltic concrete containing recycled plastics aggregate replacement (Plastiphalt). Cem Concr Compos2000; 22: 233–242.
154.
WangTJiangWXiaoJ, et al.Study on the blending behavior of asphalt binder in mixing process of hot recycling. Case Stud Constr Mater2022; 17: e01477.
155.
DiabA. Studying viscosity of asphalt binders and effect of varied production temperatures on engineering properties of HMA mixtures aboelkasim. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017; 3: 1–38.
156.
WhiteG. A synthesis on the effects of two commercial recycled plastics on the properties of bitumen and asphalt. Sustain Times2020; 12: 1–20.
157.
ShahPMMirMS. Application of nano-technology in pavement engineering: a Review. Can J Civ Eng2020; 47: 1037–1045.
158.
LuZShaAWangW, et al.Studying the properties of SBS/rice husk ash-modified asphalt binder and mixture. Adv Mater Sci Eng2020; 2020: 1–11.
159.
SolaimanianMKennedyTWTripathiR. Performance characteristics of asphalt binders and mixtures modified by waste toner. Transport Res Rec1998; 1638: 120–128. DOI: 10.3141/1638-14.
IngrassiaLPLuXFerrottiG, et al.Renewable materials in bituminous binders and mixtures: speculative pretext or reliable opportunity?Resour Conserv Recycl2019; 144: 209–222.
162.
YehPHNienYHChenJH, et al.Thermal and rheological properties of maleated polypropylene modified asphalt. Polym Eng Sci2005; 45: 1152–1158.
163.
YinFMoraesRFortunatusM, et al. Performance evaluation and chemical characterization of asphalt binders and mixtures containing recycled polyethylene. Plastic Industry. 2020; 45: 1–45.
164.
LiXClyneTRMarasteanuMO. Recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) effects on binder and mixture quality. Transport Research Board. 2004; 74: 74–86.
165.
ChenMLengBWuS, et al.Physical, chemical and rheological properties of waste edible vegetable oil rejuvenated asphalt binders. Construct Build Mater2014; 66: 286–298.
166.
WangJZhangHZhuC. Effect of multi-scale nanocomposites on performance of asphalt binder and mixture. Construct Build Mater2020; 243: 118307.
167.
ArabaniMTahamiSA. Assessment of mechanical properties of rice husk ash modified asphalt mixture. Construct Build Mater2017; 149: 350–358.
168.
TabatabaeeNTabatabaeeHA. Multiple stress creep and recovery and time sweep fatigue tests: crumb rubber modified binder and mixture performance. Transport Res Rec2010; 2180: 67–74. DOI: 10.3141/2180-08.
169.
LiuSPengAZhouS, et al.Evaluation of the ageing behavior of waste engine oil-modified asphalt binders. Construct Build Mater2019; 223: 394–408.
170.
AmeliABabagoliRTabatabaei RaziSE. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of bentonite on performance of bitumen and hot mix asphalt mixtures. Petrol Sci Technol2016; 34: 19–23.
171.
KiggunduBMHumphreyBNZallenMD. Recycling agent selection and tentative specification. Eng Serv Lab Air Force Eng Serv Cent.
172.
LiHDongBWangW, et al.Effect of waste engine oil and waste cooking oil on performance improvement of aged asphalt. Appl Sci2019; 9: 1767.
173.
Al-HdabiA. Laboratory investigation on the properties of asphalt concrete mixture with rice husk ash as filler. Construct Build Mater2016; 126: 544–551.
174.
CelikFCanakciH. Examination of the mechanical properties and failure pattern of soilcrete mixtures modified with rice husk ash. Eur J Environ Civ Eng2020; 24: 1245–1260.
175.
ShahPMMirMS. Investigating the influence of carbon nanotube on the performance of asphalt binder. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol2021; 37: 422–440.
176.
YuRZhuXZhangM, et al.Investigation on the short-term aging-resistance of thermoplastic Polyurethane-modified asphalt binders. Polymers2018; 10.
177.
ZiariHMoniriAImaninasabR, et al.Effect of copper slag on performance of warm mix asphalt. Int J Pavement Eng2019; 20: 775–781.
178.
AmeriMHesamiSGoliH. Laboratory evaluation of warm mix asphalt mixtures containing electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag. Construct Build Mater2013; 49: 611–617.
179.
FatemiSImaninasabR. Performance evaluation of recycled asphalt mixtures by construction and demolition waste materials. Construct Build Mater2016; 120: 450–456.
180.
Gómez-MeijideBPérezI. Effects of the use of construction and demolition waste aggregates in cold asphalt mixtures. Construct Build Mater2014; 51: 267–277.
181.
LiXMarasteanuMOWilliamsRC, et al.Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement (proportion and type) and binder grade on asphalt mixtures. Transport Res Rec2008; 2051: 90–97. DOI: 10.3141/2051-11.
182.
HuangBLiGVukosavljevicD, et al.Laboratory investigation of mixing hot-mix asphalt with reclaimed asphalt pavement. Transport Res Rec2005; 1929: 37–45. DOI: 10.3141/1929-05.
183.
OthmanAM.Incorporation of white cement dust on rubber modified asphalt concrete mixtures. Int J Civ Environ Eng. 2009; 9: 40–51.
184.
TuncanMTuncanACetinA. The use of waste materials in asphalt concrete mixtures. Waste Manag Res2003; 21: 83–92.
185.
RaposeirasACVargas-CerónAMovilla-QuesadaD, et al.Effect of copper slag addition on mechanical behavior of asphalt mixes containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Construct Build Mater2016; 119: 268–276.
186.
AhmedzadePYilmazM. Effect of polyester resin additive on the properties of asphalt binders and mixtures. Construct Build Mater2008; 22: 481–486.
187.
SondagMSChadbournBADrescherAInvestigation of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) mixtures2002.
188.
AmeliABabagoliRNorouziN, et al.Laboratory evaluation of the effect of coal waste ash (CWA) and rice husk ash (RHA) on performance of asphalt mastics and Stone matrix asphalt (SMA) mixture. Construct Build Mater2020; 236: 117557.
189.
AmelianSManianMAbtahiSM, et al.Moisture sensitivity and mechanical performance assessment of warm mix asphalt containing by-product steel slag. J Clean Prod2018; 176: 329–337.
190.
Muñoz-CáceresORaposeirasACMovilla-QuesadaD, et al.Mechanical performance of sustainable asphalt mixtures manufactured with copper slag and high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement. Construct Build Mater2021; 304: 124653.
