In this study, the compatibilization effects of triglycidylisobutyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (TEpPOSS) on biodegradable poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blends were investigated. All blends were prepared via melt blending and PLA/TPU (80/20, 70/30, 50/50 wt%) ratio was selected as the experimental parameter. In order to predict the selective localization of TEpPOSS thermodynamically, wetting coefficient were determined by means of surface energy measurements. Morphological analyses were carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Moreover, rheological, mechanical, thermomechanical and thermal properties of the blends were performed via rheometer, universal tensile tester, dynamic mechanic analyses and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), respectively. Morphological test results revealed that TEpPOSSs were mostly located at the interfaces of the PLA and TPU phases. According to the rheological studies, the interfacial interactions between PLA and TPU were improved with the addition of TEpPOSS, which resulted from the potential reactions between epoxy-carboxylic acid and/or epoxy-hydroxyl functional groups. The addition of TEpPOSS enhanced the mechanical properties of PLA/TPU blends. DSC test results revealed a decrease in the glass transition temperatures of PLA in the presence of TEpPOSS, which was an another indication of improved compatibility between PLA and TPU.
ReddyMMVivekanandhanSMisraM, et al.Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities, Prog Polym Sci2013; 38: 1653–1689.
2.
GarlottaD. A literature overview of poly (lactic acid). J Polym Environ2001; 9: 63–84.
GrijpmaDWZondervanGJPenningsAJ. High molecular weight copolymers of L-lactide and ε-caprolactone as biodegradable elastomeric implant materials. Polym Bull1991; 25: 327–333.
5.
HaynesDNaskarAKSinghA, et al.Poly (L-lactic acid) with segmented perfluoropolyether enchainment, Macromolecules2007; 40: 9354–9360.
6.
MurariuMDa Silva FerreiraAAlexandreM, et al.Polylactide (PLA) designed with desired end-use properties: 1. PLA compositions with low molecular weight ester-like plasticizers and related performances. Polym Adv Technol2008; 19: 636–646.
7.
JacobsenSFritzHG. Plasticizing polylactide—the effect of different plasticizers on the mechanical properties. Polym Eng Sci1999; 39: 1303–1310.
8.
WangMWuYLiYD, et al.Progress in toughening poly (lactic acid) with renewable polymers. Polym Rev2017; 57: 557–593.
9.
LiYShimizuH. Toughening of polylactide by melt blending with a biodegradable poly(ether)urethane elastomer. Macromol Biosci2007; 7: 921–928.
10.
YuRLZhangLSFengYH. Improvement in toughness of polylactide by melt blending with bio-based poly(ester)urethane. Chinese J Polym Sci2014; 32: 1099–1110.
11.
HanJJHuangHX, Preparation and characterization of biodegradable polylactide/thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer blends. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 120: 3217–3223.
12.
FengFYeL. Morphologies and mechanical properties of polylactide/ thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer blends. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 119: 2778–2783.
WangYBHillmyerMA. Polyethylene-poly(L-lactide) diblock copolymers: synthesis and compatibilization of poly(L-lactide)/polyethylene blends. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem2001; 39: 2755–2766.
17.
HaradaMIidaKOkamotoK, et al.Reactive compatibilization of biodegradable poly (lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone) blends with reactive processing agents. Polym Eng Sci2008; 48: 1359–1368.
18.
FangKWangBShengK, et al.Properties and morphology of poly (lactic acid)/soy protein isolate blends. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 114: 754–759.
19.
ZhangHCKangBHChenLS, et al.Enhancing toughness of poly (lactic acid)/thermoplastic polyurethane blends via increasing interface compatibility by polyurethane elastomer prepolymer and its toughening mechanism. Polym Test2020; 87: 106521.
20.
BernardesGPLuizNRSantanaRMC, et al.Influence of the morphology and viscoelasticity on thethermomechanical properties of poly (lactic acid)/thermoplastic polyurethane blends compatibilized with ethylene-ester copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci2020; 48926: 1–11.
21.
MahmudaMSBuysaYFAnuaraH, et al.Miscibility, morphology and mechanical properties of compatibilized polylactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Mater Today Proc2019; 17: 778–786.
22.
Mo1XZWeilFXTanDF, et al.The compatibilization of PLA-g-TPU graft copolymer on polylactide/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. J Polym Res2020; 27(33): 1–13.
23.
DoganSKReyesEARastogiS, et al.Reactive compatibilization of PLA/TPU blends with a diisocyanate. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 40251: 1–10.
24.
KaynakCMeyvaY. Use of maleic anhydride compatibilization to improve toughness and other properties of polylactide blended with thermoplastic elastomers. Polym Adv Technol2014; 25: 1622–1632.
25.
LaiSMLanYCWuWL, et al.Compatibility improvement of poly (lactic acid)/thermoplastic polyurethane blends with 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132: 42322.
26.
LiuZWChouHCChenSH, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane-toughened polylactide-based nanocomposites. Polym Compos2014; 35: 1744–1757.
27.
KelnarIKratochvılJFortelnyI, et al.Influence of clay-nanofiller geometry on the structure and properties of poly(lactic acid)/ thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. RSC Adv2016; 6: 30755–30762.
28.
YuFHuangHX. Simultaneously toughening and reinforcing poly (lactic acid)/thermoplastic polyurethane blend via enhancing interfacial adhesion by hydrophobic silica nanoparticles. Polym Test2015; 45: 107–113.
QiuZPanH. Preparation, crystallization and hydrolytic degredation of biodegradable poly(L-lactide)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanocomposite. Comp Sci Technol2010; 70: 1089–1094.
31.
BaldiFBignottiFFinaA, et al.Mechanical characterization of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane/polypropylene blends. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 105: 935–943.
32.
ZhangWFuBXSeaY, et al.Effect of methyl methacrylate/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane random copolymers in compatibilization of polystyrene and poly (methyl methacrylate) blends. Macromol2002; 35: 8029–8038.
33.
Tuccar KilicNCanBNKodalM, et al.The potential use of epoxy-POSS as a reactive hybrid compatibilizers for PLA/PBAT blends: “Effect of PBAT molecular weight and POSS type”. Polym Eng Sci2020; 60: 398–413.
34.
KilicNTCanBNKodalM, et al.Compatibilization of PLA/PBAT blends by using Epoxy-POSS. J Appl Polym Sci2019; 136: 47217.
35.
MonticelliQCalabreseMGardellaL, et al.Silsesquioxanes: Novel compatibilizing agents for tuning the microstructure and properties of PLA/PCL immiscible blends. Euro Polym J2014; 58: 69–78.
36.
YazdininiaAJafariSHEhsaniM, et al.Solid state viscoelastic properties, morphological and melt rheological studies on PLA/TPU/POSS nanocomposites. Polym Plast Techn Mater2019; 58: 1036–1045.
37.
OzkocGBayramGBayramliE. Effects of polyamide 6 incorporation to the short glass fiber reinforced ABS composites: an interfacial approach. Polymer2004; 45: 8957–8966.
38.
AkbayARBayramliE. The effect of surface activation in polymer matrix-carbon fiber interactions. J Adhes1995; 50: 155–164.
ZhaiWKoYZhuW, et al.A Study of the crystallization, melting, and foaming behaviours of Poly (lactic acid) in compressed CO2. Int J Mol Sci2009; 10: 5381–5397.
41.
GöldelAKasaliwalGPötschkeP. Selective localization and migration of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in blends of polycarbonate and poly(styrene-acrylonitrile). Macromol Rapid Commun2009; 30: 423–429.
42.
ChenGHLuJGWuDJ. The electrical properties of graphite nanosheet filled immiscible polymer blends. Mater Chem Phys2007; 104: 240–243.
43.
Ibarra-GomezRMarquezAValleL, et al.Influence of the blend viscosity and interface energies on the preferential location of CB and conductivity of BR/EPDM blends. Rubber Chem Technol2003; 76: 969–978.
44.
SumitaMSakataKAsaiS, et al.Dispersion of fillers and the electrical conductivity of polymer blends filled with carbon black. Polym Bull1991; 25: 265–271.
LaoutidFFrançoisDPaintY, et al.Using nanosilica to fine-tune morphology and properties of polyamide 6/polypropylene blends. Macromol Mater Eng2013; 298: 328–338.
47.
ZouHWangKZhangQ, et al.A change of phase morphology in poly (p-phenylene sulfide)/polyamide 66 blends induced by adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymer2006; 47: 7821–7826.
48.
TaguetACassagnauPLopez-CuestaJM. Structuration, selective dispersion and compatibilizing effect of (nano)fillers in polymer blends. J Prog Polym Sci2014; 39: 1526–1563.
49.
WuDLinDZhangJ, et al.Selective localization of nanofillers: effect on morphology and crystallization of PLA/PCL blends. Macromol Chem Phys2011; 212: 613–626.
50.
FenouillotFCassagnauPMajesteJC. Uneven distribution of nanoparticles in immiscible fluids: morphology development in polymer blends. Polymer2009; 50: 1333–1350.
51.
TangQGaoK. Structure analysis of polyether-based thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers by FTIR, 1 H NMR and 13C NMR. Int J Polym Anal Ch2017; 22: 569–574.
52.
YuSXiangHZhouJ, et al.Enhanced flame-retardant performance of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) composite by using intrinsically phosphorus-containing PLA. Prog Nat Sci2018; 28: 590–597.
53.
RamírezCRicoMTorresA, et al.Epoxy/POSS organic–inorganic hybrids: ATR-FTIR and DSC studies. Eur Polym J2008; 44: 3035–3045.
54.
RathiSSCoughlinEBHsuSL, et al.Maintaining structural stability of poly (lactic acid): Effects of multifunctional epoxy based reactive oligomers. Polymers2014; 6: 1232–1250.
55.
HaralabakopoulusAATsiourvasDPaleosCM. Chain extension of poly (ethylene terephthalate) by reactive blending using diepoxies. J Appl Polym Sci1999; 71: 2121–2127.
56.
MacoskoCWJeonHKHoyeTR. Reactions at polymer–polymer interfaces for blend compatibilization. Prog Polym Sci2005; 30: 939–947.
57.
TjongSCMengYZ. Structural-mechanical relationship of epoxy compatibilized polyamide 6/polycarbonate blends. Mater Res Bullet2004; 39: 1791–1801.
58.
MartinPDevauxJLegrasR, et al.Competitive reactions during compatibilization of blends of polybutyleneterephthalate with epoxide-containing rubber. Polymer2001; 42: 2463–2478.
59.
ShiehYTLıaoTNChangFC. Reactive compatibilization of PP/PBT blends by a mixture of PP-G-MA and epoxy resin. J Appl Polym Sci2001; 79: 2272–2285.
60.
OliaeiEKaffasiBDavoodiS. Investigation of structure and mechanical properties of toughened poly (L lactide)/thermoplastic poly(ester urethane) blends. J Appl Polym Sci2016; 43104: 1–13.
61.
NichettiDManas-ZloczowerI. Viscosity model for polydisperse polymer melts. J Rheol1998; 42: 951–969.
62.
HaradaMOhyaTLidaK, et al.Increased impact strength of biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene succinate) blend composites by using isocyanate as a reactive processing agent. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 106: 1813–1820.
WangHSunXSeibP. Strengthening blends of poly (lactic acid) and starch with methylenediphenyl diisocyanate. J Appl Polym Sci2001; 82: 1761–1767.
65.
ShiDZhouKYangJ, et al.Rheology and morphology of reactively compatibilized PP/PA6 blends. Macromolecules2002; 35: 8005–8012.
66.
SailerCHandgeUA. Reactive blending of polyamide 6 and styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer: influence of blend composition and compatibilizer concentration on morphology and rheology. Macromolecules2008; 41: 4258–4267.
67.
KitayamaNKeskkulaHPaulDR. Reactive compatibilization of nylon 6/styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer blends. Part 1. phase inversion behaviour. Polymer2000; 41: 8041–8052.
68.
BorahJSChakiTK. Dynamic rheological, morphology and mechanical properties of compatibilized LLDPE/EMA blends. J Polym Res2011; 18: 907–916.
69.
CrawfordELesserAJ. Mechanics of rubber particle cavitation in toughened polyvinylchloride (PVC). Polymer2000; 41: 5865–5870.
70.
JaratrotkamjornRKhaokongCTanrattanakulV. Toughness enhancement of poly (lactic acid) by melt blending with natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 124: 5027–5036.
71.
BitinisNVerdejoRCassagnauP, et al.Deformation mechanisms in polylactic acid/natural rubber/organoclay bionanocomposites as revealed by synchrotron X-ray scattering. Mater Chem Phys2013; 129: 823–831.
72.
KodalM.Polypropylene/polyamide 6/POSS ternary nanocomposites: effects of POSS nanoparticles on the compatibility. Polymer2016; 105: 43–50.
73.
RenJFuHRenT, et al.Preparation, characterization and properties of binary and ternary blends with thermoplastic starch, poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate-co terephthalate). Carbohydr Polym2009; 77: 576–582.
74.
LinSGuoWChenC, et al.Mechanical properties and morphology of biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)blends compatibilized by transesterification. Mater Design2012; 36: 604–608.
75.
TorresNRobınJJBoutevınB. Chemical modification of virgin and recycled poly(ethyleneterephthalate) by adding of chain extenders during processing. J Appl Polym Sci2001; 79: 1816–1824.
76.
KomalanCGeorgeKEKumarPAS, et al.Dynamic mechanical analysis of binary and ternary polymer blends based on nylon copolymer/EPDM rubber and EPM grafted maleic anhydride compatibilizer. Express Polym Lett2007; 1–10: 641–653.
77.
CroneGNatansohnA. Compatibilization of poly (methyl acrylate) and polystyrene through charge transfer interactions. Polym Bull1991; 27: 73–80.
78.
WunderlichB. Thermal analysis of polymeric materials. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 2005.
79.
KodalMSirinHOzkocG. Effects of reactive and nonreactive POSS types on the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of plasticized poly (lactic acid). Polym Eng Sci2014; 54: 264–275.
80.
YasuniwaMTsubakiharaSSugimotoY, et al.Thermal analysis of the double-melting behavior of poly (L-lactic acid). J Polym Sci Polym Phys2004; 42: 25–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
