In the face of the pandemic, bioethics, once again, proved its scientific utility. In France, in particular, the academic approach (= peer-reviewed, scientific publications, etc.) should be given priority over the institutional approach (= public surveys, public meetings, etc.), in hospitals, research institutes, universities, and companies, with the professionalization that this would imply (i.e. bioethicists).
LewisJ. A new era for clinical ethics. Clin Ethics2022; 17: 221–224.
2.
StoekleHCHerveC. COVID-19: act first, think later. Am J Bioeth2020; 1.
3.
StoekléH-CIvasilevitchAHervéC. The COVID-19 pandemic: a time for ethical reflection?The Lancet2021; 397: 1619–1620.
4.
StoekléH-CIvasilevitchALadratL, et al.[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospital: the contribution of bioethics.]. Méd Catastr Urgences Collect2022; 6: 99–104. [In French].
5.
StoekléH-CSekkateSAngellierE, et al.From a voluntary vaccination policy to mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 in cancer patients: an empirical and interdisciplinary study in bioethics. BMC Med Ethics2022; 23: 88.
6.
StoekléH-CIvasilevitchAHervéC. Bioethics: “the science of survival”?Can J Bioeth / Revue Canadienne de Bioéthique2022; 5: 161–162.
7.
StoekléHCIvasilevitchAMarignacG, et al.Creation and use of organoids in biomedical research and healthcare: the bioethical and metabioethical issues. Cell Adh Migr2021; 15: 285–294.
8.
StoekleHCCharlierPMamzer-BruneelMF, et al.Systemic modelling in bioethics. New Bioeth2020; 26: 197–209.
9.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, 1978.
10.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. UK: Oxford University Press ed, 1979.
11.
KimeraSMlangwaJ. Veterinary ethics. In Encyclopedia of global bioethics, Springer, 2015.
12.
StoekléH-CHervéC. Ownership of genetic data: between universalism and contextualism?Am J Bioeth2021; 21: 75–77.
13.
StoekleHCIvasilevitchAMarignacG, et al.Ethical issues of brain organoids: well beyond “consciousness”?AJOB Neurosci2022; 15: 109–111.
14.
AzetsopJRennieS. Principlism, medical individualism, and health promotion in resource-poor countries: can autonomy-based bioethics promote social justice and population health?Philos Ethics Humanit Med2010; 5: 1.
15.
BarugahareJ. African bioethics: methodological doubts and insights. BMC Med Ethics2018; 19: 98.
16.
PotterV. Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Prentice-Hall ed, 1971.
17.
StoekléHCSekkateSAyoubiJM, et al.An ethics of HPV vaccination: beyond principlism. Hum Vaccin Immunother2022: 2082793. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2082793.
18.
StoekléHCAckermannFBeuzebocP, et al.Vaccine refusal and burnout: hospitals need “emergency multidisciplinary team meetings”. J Eval Clin Pract2022; 28: 493–494.
19.
IyerNGChuaMLK. Multidisciplinary team meetings - challenges of implementation science. Nat Rev Clin Oncol2019; 16: 205–206.
DurandG. [General introduction to bioethics: history, concepts and tools.]. FIDES ed, 2007, [In French].
22.
StoekléHCLadratLLandrinT, et al.Bio-ethical issues in oncology during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic: evidence, equality and liberty. J Eval Clin Pract2022.
23.
StoekléH-CSekkateSAngellierE, et al.Refusal of anti-coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in cancer patients: is there a difference between the sexes?Eur J Cancer2021; 155: 54–55.
24.
StoekléH-CHervéC. [COVID-19: what bioethics for the future?]. Can J Bioeth / Revue Canadienne de Bioéthique2020; 3: 93–94. [In French].
25.
StoekléH-CHervéC. [COVID-19: how to solve the crisis?]. Can J Bioeth / Revue Canadienne de Bioéthique2020; 3: 108–109. [In French].
26.
StoekléH-CIvasilevitchAHulier-AmmarE, et al.[COVID-19: what role for ethics committees?]. Méd Droit2021; 2021: 17–18. [In French].
27.
IvasilevitchAStoekléH-CAckermannF, et al.Chapitre 8. COVID-19: the danger of blindly applying the “steepest curve”. J Int Bioéthique éthique Sci2021; 32: 151–153.
28.
HervéCStoekléHC. [Reflection and approach for a veterinary ethics: contribution of “bioethicist” colleagues.]. Bull Acad Vét de France2020; 173: 128–133, [In French].
29.
StoekléH-CHervéC. [Medicine “for” and “with” the patient.]. Med Sci (Paris)2021; 37: 831–832. [In French].
30.
StoekléH-CIvasilevitchAMellotF, et al.[Artificial intelligence and the contribution of dynamic informed consent in radiology.]. Droit Santé Soc2021; 2: 61–65. [In French].
31.
StoekleHCIvasilevitchAHerveC. Dynamic consent in neuroscience too?AJOB Neurosci2021; 12: 70–72.
32.
HuretLStoekléHCBenmazianeA, et al.Cancer and COVID-19: ethical issues concerning the use of telemedicine during the pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res2022; 22: 03.
