Advance directives allow people to accept or decline medical interventions and to appoint surrogate decision makers if they become incapacitated. Living wills are written in ambiguous terms and require interpretation by clinical providers. Living wills cannot cover all conceivable end-of-life decisions. There is too much variability in clinical decision making to make an all-encompassing living will possible. While there are many limitations of advance directives, this article reviews some of the most troublesome ethical dilemmas with regard to advance directives.
American Heart Association.
Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resucitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC): medicolegal considerations and recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Association1974;
227: 864–866.
2.
BurnsJPEdwardsJJohnsonJ, et al.
Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years. Crit Care Med May 2003;
31: 1543–1550.
3.
SloaneL. ‘91 law says failing patients must be told of their options. The New York Times, 8 December 1990, section 1, p. 50.
4.
KarlinskyHTaerkGSchwartzK, et al.
Suicide attempts and resuscitation dilemmas. Gen Hosp Psychiatry1988;
10: 423–430.
