The Pacific Islander population is the second fasting growing population in the United States and Arkansas is home to the largest Marshallese population in the continental US. The Marshallese community have significant health disparities with high prevalence of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity compared to the general US population. Using a community-based participatory research approach, researchers and Marshallese community stakeholders identified diabetes as the top health issue for research.
Methods
From 2014 to 2018, a randomized control trial was conducted comparing standard diabetes management education with a culturally adapted family model of standard diabetes management education delivered in participants’ homes by Marshallese community health workers and certified diabetes educators. Interviews were held with Marshallese participants to document their experiences with and perceptions of the informed consent process for this randomized control trial.
Results
Participants provided feedback on the process of enrolling in the study, describing barriers and facilitators to giving informed consent from their perspective, and offering recommendations for improving the informed consent process.
Conclusion
Findings suggest that informed consent with underserved communities, including immigrant and migrant populations who do not speak English or have limited English proficiency, is possible, and that using a community-based participatory research approach can help facilitate the informed consent process.
HixsonLHeplerBKimM.The Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population 2010.
Washington, DC:
United States Census Bureau, 2012.
2.
GriecoE.The Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population: Census 2000 Brief.
Washington, DC:
United States Census Bureau, 2001.
3.
United States Census Bureau. Profile of general demographic characteristics: 2000 census summary file 1, table DP-1, http://factfinder.census.gov (2000, accessed 19 September 2019).
4.
United States Census Bureau. American community survey demographic and housing estimates: 2012–2016 ACS 5-year estimates, Table DP05,http://factfinder.census.gov (2016, accessed 19 September 2019).
SchillerJLucasJWardB, et al. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2010. Vital Health Stat 2012; 252:1–207.
7.
LookMTrask-BattiMMauM, et al. Assessment and Priorities for Health & Well-Being in Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Peoples.
Honolulu:
University of Hawaii, 2013.
TungW.Diabetes among native Hawaiians and Pacific islanders. Home Health Care Manag Pract2012;
24: 309–311.
10.
MauMSinclairKSaitoE, et al.
Cardiometabolic health disparities in native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Epidemiol Rev2009;
31: 113–129.
11.
OkihiroMHarriganR.An overview of obesity and diabetes in the diverse populations of the Pacific. Ethn Dis2005;
15: S5-71-80.
12.
HawleyNMcGarveyS.Obesity and diabetes in Pacific Islanders: the current burden and the need for urgent action. Curr Diab Rep2015;
15: 29.
13.
McElfishPRowlandBLongC, et al.
Diabetes and hypertension in Marshallese adults: results from faith-based health screenings. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities2017;
4: 1042–1050.
14.
ZelayaCGalinskyASimileC, et al. Health care access and utilization among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander persons in the United States, 2014. Vital Health Stat 3 2017; 41:1–79.
15.
McElfishPPurvisRMaskarinecG, et al.
Interpretive policy analysis: Marshallese COFA migrants and the Affordable Care Act. Int J Equity Health2016;
15: 91.
16.
ChoiJ.Contextual effects on health care access among immigrants: lessons from three ethnic communities in Hawaii. Soc Sci Med2009;
69: 1261–1271.
17.
HallgrenEMcElfishPRubon-ChutaroJ.Barriers and opportunities: a community-based participatory research study of health beliefs related to diabetes in a US Marshallese community. Diabetes Educ2015;
41: 86–94.
18.
McElfishP.Health policies creating inequality for Marshallese migrants in Arkansas. J Arkansas Med Soc2016;
112: 259–262.
19.
DukeMR.Neocolonialism and health care access among Marshall Islanders in the United States. Med Anthropol Q2017;
31: 422–439.
20.
ChoiJ.Seeking health care: Marshallese migrants in Hawai’i. Ethn Health2008;
13: 73–92.
21.
JuarezDTSamoaRAChungRS, et al.
Disparities in health, obesity and access to care among an insured population of Asian and Pacific Islander Americans in Hawai’i. Hawaii Med J2010;
69: 42–46.
22.
BarkerH.Bravo for the Marshallese: Regaining Control in a Post-Nuclear, Post-Colonial World.
Belmont, CA:
Cengage Learning, 2012.
23.
PollockN.Health transitions, fast and nasty: exposure to nuclear radiation. Pac Health Dialog2002;
9: 275–282.
24.
GuyerR.Radioactivity and rights: clashes at Bikini Atoll. Am J Public Health2001;
91: 1371–1376.
25.
BondVPConardRARobertsonJS, et al. Medical Examination of Rongelap People Six Months After Exposure to Fallout.
Bethesda, MD and San Francisco, CA:
Naval Medical Research Institute and U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, 1955.
26.
ConradR.Fallout: The Experiences of a Medical Team in the Care of a Marshallese Population Accidentally Exposed to Fallout Radiation.
Upton, NY:
Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1992.
27.
CronkiteEBondVBrowningL, et al. Study of Response of Human Beings Accidentally Exposed to Significant Fallout Radiation.
Bethesda, MD and San Francisco, CA:
Naval Medical Research Institute and U.S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, 1954.
28.
DuranEDuranB.Yellow Horse Brave Heart M, Yellow Horse-Davis S. Healing the American Indian soul wound. In: DanieliY (ed.) International Handbook of Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma.
New York:
Springer, 1998, pp.341–354.
29.
MohattNVThompsonABThaiND, et al.
Historical trauma as public narrative: a conceptual review of how history impacts present-day health. Soc Sci Med2014;
106: 128–136.
30.
McElfishPAGouldenPABursacZ, et al.
Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community. Nurs Inq2017;
24: 1–11.
31.
McElfishPAMooreRLaelanM, et al.
Using CBPR to address health disparities with the Marshallese community in Arkansas. Ann Hum Biol2018;
45: 264–271.
32.
McElfishPKohlerPSmithC, et al.
Community-driven research agenda to reduce health disparities. Clin Transl Sci2015;
8: 690–695.
33.
GaventaJCornwallA.Challenging the boundaries of the possible: participation, knowledge and power. IDS Bulletin2006;
37: 122–128.
34.
GaventaJ.Citizen knowledge, citizen competence and democracy building. The Good Society1995;
5: 28–35.
35.
MinklerMWallersteinN (eds). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2008.
36.
WallersteinN.Power between evaluator and community: Research relationships within New Mexico’s healthier communities. Soc Sci Med1999;
49: 39–53.
37.
MinklerM.Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Educ Behav2004;
31: 684–697.
38.
WallersteinNDuranB.Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract2006;
7: 312–323.
39.
VaughnLMJacquezFLindquist-GrantzR, et al.
Immigrants as research partners: a review of immigrants in community-based participatory research (CBPR). J Immigr Minor Health2017;
19: 1457–1486.
40.
YearyKHKLongCRBursacZ, et al.
Design of a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial testing a family model of Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) vs. standard DSME for Marshallese in the United States. Contemp Clin Trials Commun2017;
6: 97–104.
41.
McElfishPLongCKohlerP, et al. Comparative effectiveness and maintenance of diabetes self-management education interventions for Marshallese type 2 diabetes patients: a randomized controlled trial. Diab Care2019;
42: 849–858.
42.
Office for Human Research Protections. Protection of Human Subjects Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 45.
Washington, DC:
US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009.
43.
LarsonEFoeGLallyR.Reading level and length of written research consent forms. Clin Transl Sci2015;
8: 355–356.
44.
TamarizLPalacioARobertM, et al.
Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med2013;
28: 121–126.
45.
LeeRLampertSWilderL, et al.
Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health2011;
8: 830–841.
46.
KoyfmanSAReddyCAHizlanS, et al.
Informed consent conversations and documents: a quantitative comparison. Cancer2016;
122: 464–469.
47.
WallLPentzR.Another look at the informed consent process: the document and the conversation. Cancer2016;
122: 352–354.
48.
Soto MasFJiMFuentesBO, et al.
The Health Literacy and ESL study: a community-based intervention for Spanish-speaking adults. J Health Commun2015;
20: 369–376.
49.
GlickmanSWNdubuizuAWeinfurtKP, et al.
Perspective: the case for research justice: inclusion of patients with limited English proficiency in clinical research. Acad Med2011;
86: 389–393.
50.
HaddenKBPrinceLYMooreTD, et al.
Improving readability of informed consents for research at an academic medical institution. J Clin Transl Sci2017;
1: 361–365.
51.
NeergaardMAOlesenFAndersenRS, et al.
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?BMC Med Res Methodol2009;
9: 52.
52.
SandelowskiM.Whatever happened to qualitative description?Res Nurs Health2000;
23: 334–340.
53.
SandelowskiM.What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health2010;
33: 77–84.
54.
GieseAUyarMUslucanH, et al.
How do hospitalised patients with Turkish migration background estimate their language skills and their comprehension of medical information – a prospective cross-sectional study and comparison to native patients in Germany to assess the language barrier and the need for translation. BMC Health Serv Res2013;
13:196.
55.
HoA.Using family members as interpreters in the clinical setting. J Clin Ethics2008;
19: 223–233.
56.
FloryJEmanuelE.Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA2004;
292: 1593–1601.
57.
CohnELarsonE.Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process. J Nurs Scholarsh2007;
39: 273–280.
58.
StraussRPSenguptaSQuinnSC, et al.
The role of community advisory boards: involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health2001;
91: 1938–1943.
59.
MontalvoWLarsonE.Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh2014;
46: 423–431.
60.
FortunPWestJChalkleyL, et al.
Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials. QJM2008;
101: 625–629.
61.
SherlockABrownieS.Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg2014;
84: 207–210.
62.
Office of the Federal Register.Federal Register Vol. 82, No. 12 Thursday, January 19, 2017 Rules and Regulations.
Washington, DC:
National Archives and Records Administration, 2017, pp.7209–7211.
