It is commonly assumed that there are differences in physicians’ and caregivers’ ethical attitudes towards clinical situations. The assumption is that the difference is driven by different values, views and judgements in specific situations. At Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, we aimed to investigate these assumptions by conducting a large quantitative study. The study design, based on the Factorial Survey Method, was a carefully constructed survey with 50 questions designed to test which factors influenced the respondents’ ethical reasoning. The factors were clustered into three categories of ethical reasoning and values. The categories were formulated in terms of easily recognizable ethical positions: consequential ethics, deontological ethics and relational ethics. Based on 2129 respondents, we found significant support for the assumption of differences between physicians and caregivers. The group of caregivers favoured the relational ethics view in clinical ethical situations, and the group of physicians favoured the position of deontological ethics.
NightingaleF.Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not.
Philadelphia: J.B.:
Lippincott Company, 1946 (first publication 1859).
2.
OberleKHughesD.Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethical problems in end-of-life decisions. J Adv Nurs2001;
33: 707–715.
3.
Breier-MackieS.Medical ethics and nursing ethics: is there really any difference?Gastroenterol Nurs2006;
29: 182–183.
4.
WellerJMBarrowMGasquoineS.Interprofessional collaboration among junior doctors and nurses in the hospital setting. Med Educ2011;
45: 478–487.
5.
YarcheskiAMahonNEYarcheskiTJ.A descriptive study of research published in scientific nursing journals from 1985 to 2010.Int J Nurs Stud2012;
49: 1112–1121.
6.
McNamaraMSFealyGM.Knowledge matters in nursing. In: MYoungJMullereds (eds) Knowledge, Expertise and the Professions.
New York:
Routledge, 2014, pp. 157–170.
7.
PrinceKvan EijsPBoshuizenHet al.
General competencies of problem-based learning (PBL) and non-PBL graduates. Med Educ2005;
39: 394–401.
8.
BrosnanCTurnerBS (eds). Handbook of the Sociology of Medical Education.
London:
Routledge, 2009.
9.
ChioBCKPakAWP.Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med2006;
29: 351–364.
10.
BrownJLewisLEllisKet al.
Conflict on interprofessional primary health care teams – can it be resolved?J Interprof Care2011;
25: 4–10.
11.
EngelJPrenticeD.The ethics of interprofessional collaboration. Nurs Ethics2013;
20: 426–435.
12.
RobertsonDW.Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care. J Med Ethics1996;
22: 292–299.
13.
KingstonMJEvansSMSmithBJ.Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis.Med J Aust2004;
181: 36–39.
14.
PaldaVBowmanKWMcLeanRFet al.
Futile care: do we provide it? Why? A semistructured, Canada-wide survey of intensive care unit doctors and nurses.J Crit Care2005;
22: 207–213.
15.
HariharanSJonnalagaddaRWalrondEet al.Knowledge, attitudes and practice of healthcare ethics and law among doctors and nurses in Barbados. BMC Medical Ethics2006;
7: 7. [Mismatch]
16.
PiersRDAzoulayERicouBet al.
Inappropriate care in European ICUs. Chest2014;
146: 267–275.
17.
Jiménez-HerreraMFAxelssonC.Some ethical conflicts in emergency care. Nurs Ethics2015;
22: 548–560.
18.
GrönlundCFDahlqvistVZingmarkKet al.
Managing ethical difficulties in healthcare: communicating in inter-professional clinical ethics support sessions. HEC Forum2016;
28: 321–338.
19.
EjrnæsMMonradM.Vignetmetoden – sociologisk metode og redskab til faglig udvikling [The Vignette method – sociological method and tool for professional development].
Copenhagen:
Akademisk Forlag, 2012.
20.
WallanderL.Measuring social workers’ judgements: why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. J Soc Work2012;
12: 364–384.
21.
StaceyDBriéreNRobetailleHet.al.
A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making.J Interprof Care2014;
28: 453–459.
22.
EvensSCRobertsMCKeeleyJWet al.
Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies 2015. Int J Clin Health Psychol2015;
15: 160–170.
23.
SlagerSLWierCRKimHet.al.
Physicians’ perception of alternative displays of clinical research evidence for clinical decision support – a study with case vignettes.J Biomed Inform2017;
71: S53–S59.
24.
BeauchampTLChildressJF.Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2013.
JudsonKHarrisonC.Law & Ethics for Health Professions. 7th ed.
Columbus:
McGraw-Hill, 2016.
27.
TelléusPK.Begreppslig Betänksamhet – ett filosofiskt bidrag till den tillämpade etiken [Conceptual deliberation – a philosophical contribution to applied ethics]. PhD Thesis, Department of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark,2013.
BringedalBIsaksson RøKMagelssenMet al.
Between professional values, social regulations and patient preferences: medical doctors' perceptions of ethical dilemmas. J Med Ethics2018;
44: 239–243.
31.
HoldgaardDMThørringBTelléusPK. Faktorer, der har betydning for sygeplejerskers holdning til ‘God Klinisk Praksis’ – et empirisk studie på Aalborg Universitets hospital [Factors that matters to caregivers’ attitude to ‘good clinical practise’ – an empirical study at Aalborg University Hospital]. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning/Nordic Nursing Research, submitted December 2017.
