Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Family presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation is still not widely implemented. Based on empirical evidence, various national and international professional organizations recommend allowing relatives to be present during resuscitation. However, healthcare providers worldwide are still reluctant to make it standard care.

Purpose

This paper is a part of an ongoing cross-cultural study that aims to solicit attitudes of healthcare providers working in emergency departments towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This paper reports the qualitative data from surveying healthcare providers working in an emergency department at a university-affiliated hospital in Singapore.

Method

Healthcare workers were asked to fill out an online survey, including both quantitative and qualitative questions. Their attitudes were critically analyzed and compared with existing empirical data.

Results

Majority of healthcare workers (71.6%) believed that relatives should not be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 52% thought that relatives would not want to be present.

Conclusion

Most emergency department doctors and nurses in Singapore do not support family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Their concerns included: family’s possible interruption of patient care, the relatives’ well-being, and their own interests, as well as limited physical space and resources. Most of these concerns do not stand in the face of existing empirical data or ethical scrutiny. We therefore recommend in favor of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Keywords

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation end of life care cardiopulmonary resuscitation autonomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kayser

Ornato

Peberdya

. Cardiac arrest in the emergency department. A report from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation 2008; 78: 151–160.

McNally

Robb

Mehta

et al.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance – Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005-December 31, 2010. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2011; 60: 1–19.

Robinson

Mackenzie-Ross

Hewson

GLC

et al.

Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relatives. Lancet 1998; 352: 614–617.

Lederman

Garasic

Piperberg

. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide? J Med Ethics 2014; 40: 315–319.

Walker

. Review – do relatives have a right to witness resuscitation. J Crit Nurs 1999; 8: 625–630.

Jabre

Belpomme

Azoulay

et al.

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1008–1018.

Goldberger

Nallamothu

Nichol

et al.

Policies allowing family presence during resuscitation and patterns of care during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovas Qual Outcomes 2015; 8: 226–234.

Lederman

. Family presence during resuscitation – evidence based guidelines? Resuscitation 2016; 105: e5–e6.

Baskett

Steen

Bossssaert

. European Resuscitation Council. Guidelines for resuscitation 2005: Section 8. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 171–180.

10.

Sheng

Kim

Rashidi

. A multi-center study on the attitudes of Malasian emergency health care staff towards allowing family presence during resuscitation of adult patients. Int J Emerg Med 2010; 3: 287–291.

11.

Ong

MEH

Chan

Srither

et al.

Asian medical staff attitudes towards witnessed resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004; 60: 45–50.

12.

Ong

MEH

Chung

Mei

JSE

. Comparing attitudes of the public and medical staff towards witnessed resuscitation in an Asian population. Resuscitation 2007; 73: 103–108.

13.

O'Brien

Harris

Beckman

et al.

Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1245–1251.

14.

Lederman

Wacht

. Attitudes of Yale staff members towards family presence during resuscitation. Yale J Biol Med 2014; 187: 63–72.

15.

Compton

Levy

Griffin

et al.

Family-witnessed resuscitation: bereavement outcomes in an urban environment. J Palliat Med 2011; 14: 715–721.

16.

Hanson

Strawser

. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Foote hospital emergency department nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs 1992; 18: 104–106.

17.

Grudzen

Stone

Morrison

. The palliative care model for emergency department patients with advanced illness. J Palliat Med 2011; 14: 945–950.

18.

Quest

Asplin

Cairns

et al.

Research priorities for palliative and end-of-life care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18: 70–76.

19.

Moreland

. Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation in the emergency department: a review of the literature. J Emerg Nurs 2005; 31: 58–72.

20.

Salmond

Paplanus

Avadhani

. Using systematic reviews to guide decision making about family-witnessed resuscitation. J Perianesth Nurs 2014; 29: 480–490.

21.

Itzhaki

Bar-Tal

Barnoy

. Reaction of staff members and lay people to family presence during resuscitation: the effect of visible bleeding, resuscitation outcome and gender. J Adv Nurs 2011; 68: 1–11.

22.

Halm

. Family presence during resuscitation: a critical review of the literature. Am J Crit Care 2005; 14: 494–511.

23.

Jabre

Tazarourte

Azoulay

et al.

Offering the opportunity for family to be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 1-year assessment. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 981–987.

24.

Basol

Ohman

Simones

et al.

Using research to determine support for a policy on family presence during resuscitation. Dimen Crit Care Nurs 2009; 28: 237–247.

25.

Meyers

Eichhorn

Guzzetta

. Do families want to be present during CPR? A retrospective survey. J Emerg Nurs 1998; 24: 400–405.

26.

Belanger

Reed

. A rural community hospital's experience with family-witnessed resuscitation. J Emerg Nurs 1997; 23: 238–239.

27.

Paplanus

Salmond

Jadotte

et al.

A systematic review of family witnessed resuscitation and family witnessed invasive procedures in adults in hospital settings internationally – part I: perspectives of patients and families. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2012; 10: 1883–2017.

28.

Childress

. The place of autonomy in bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 1990; 20: 12–17.

29.

Gillon

. Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be ‘first among equals’. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 307–312.

30.

Gillon

. Autonomy and the principle of respect for autonomy. J Med Ethics 1985; 290: 1806–1808.

31.

Should relatives witness resuscitation? A report from a Project Team of the Resuscitation Council (UK). London: Resuscitation Council, UK, 1996.

32.

Fernandez

Compton

Jones

et al.

The presence of a family witness impacts physician performance during simulated medical codes. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 1956–1960.

33.

Kentish-Barnes

Davidson

Cox

. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an opportunity for meaning-making in bereavement. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1954–1956.

34.

Teo KSH. Confucian healthcare system in Singapore: a family-oriented approach to financial sustainability. In: Lee SC (ed.) The family, medical decision-making, and biotechnology: critical reflections on Asian moral perspectives. Springer, 2007.

Attitudes of Singapore Emergency Department staff towards family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References