Public preferences for allocation of donated livers for transplantation: A conjoint analysis

Abstract

Despite the fact that the criteria for allocation of donated livers have been laid down for years, these criteria may not help to select a potential recipient from those with the same medical requirements. This study used conjoint analysis method to determine the importance of certain non-medical factors from the public’s point of view. Through a population based study, a sample of 899 randomly selected persons filled a questionnaire where in each question the respondents had to choose one out of two hypothetical patients as the recipients of a donor liver considering their expressed characteristics. The collected data were analyzed by means of conjoint analysis method, and the importance of each characteristic was determined. According to the respondents the important criteria for allocation of donated livers included younger age, being married or breadwinner of the family, more than 3-year survival after transplantation, and having no role in causing the illness. Among the selected criteria, financial ability to pay post-operation costs had the least value on the selection. The findings of this study indicate that the public may values certain social and individual factors in case of multiple potential recipients with equal medical need for liver transplant.

Keywords

Directed tissue donation tissue and organ procurement public value policy making priority

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Department of Health and Human Services, Organ procurement and transplantation network. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/advancedData.asp (accessed September 2013).

Abouna

. Organ shortage crisis: Problems and possible solutions. Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 34–38.

Arulraj

Neuberger

. Liver transplantation: Filling the gap between supply and demand. Clin Med 2011; 11: 194–198.

Tilney

. A crisis in transplantation: Too much demand for too few organs. Transplant Rev 1998; 12: 112–120.

Services UDoHaH. Organ procurement and transplantation network. Health Resources and Services Administration; 2012. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov (accessed September 2013).

Freeman

Jamieson

Schaubel

. Who should get a liver graft? J Hepatol 2009; 50: 664–673.

Müllhaupt

Dimitroulis

Gerlach

. Hot topics in liver transplantation: Organ allocation – extended criteria donor – living donor liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2008; 48: S58–67.

Persad

Wertheimer

Emanuel

. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet 2009; 373: 423–431.

Tong

Howard

Jan

. Community preferences for the allocation of solid organs for transplantation: A systematic review. Transplantation 2010; 89: 796–805.

10.

Danesh

Nedjat

Asghari

. Organ allocation for liver transplantation according to the public opinion. Hepat Mon 2012; 12: e6183–e6183.

11.

Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Researcher Publishers LLC, 2010, pp. 57–66.

12.

Browning

Thomas

. Community values and preferences in transplantation organ allocation decisions. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 853–861.

13.

Ratcliffe

. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. Health Econ 2000; 9: 137–148.

14.

Neuberger

Adams

MacMaster

. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: Survey of public and clinicians. BMJ 1998; 317: 172–175.

15.

Dolan

Shaw

. A note on a discussion group study of public preferences regarding priorities in the allocation of donor kidneys. Health Policy 2004; 68: 31–36.

16.

Chan

Cheung

Yip

. Selection criteria for recipients of scarce donor livers: A public opinion survey in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2006; 12: 40–46.