An effectiveness assessment on access criteria for advance fertility treatment funded by the National Health Service, UK, in people who need help to procreate identified serious ethical issues associated with these criteria. The new draft National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on fertility treatment that aims to expand the eligible group of patients is deemed inadequate on the basis that the right to found a family should be accorded to all. Assisted reproductive techniques aim to satisfy a basic human need and therefore should be routine part of the National Health Service.
KenyonGLChongKEnkoff-SageM. Public adoption by gay and lesbian parents in North Carolina: policy and practice. Fam Soc2003; 84: 571–575.
6.
WattAMElshaugAGWillisCD. Assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness to inform disinvestment policy. Health Policy2011; 102: 200–213.
7.
ConnollyMGalloFHoorensS. Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK. Hum Reprod2009; 24: 626–632.
8.
GunnellDJEwingsP. Infertility prevalence, needs assessment and purchasing. J Public Health Med1994; 16: 29–35.
9.
Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Fertility treatment in 2010: trends and figures, http://www.hfea.gov.uk (2010, accessed 8 June 2011).
10.
TannsjoT. Who should bear the cost of IVF? In search of a just solution. Reprod Biomed Online2007; 14(Suppl): 149–157.
