Perceptions of procedural justice (PJ) by prisoners have been found to be associated with a number of public health and safety outcomes. As language skills are an important prerequisite, PJ is at risk in countries with a high proportion of non-nationals in prisons, such as Switzerland. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between perceptions of PJ and language barriers among male prisoners (N = 241) incarcerated in the largest penitentiary in Switzerland. A questionnaire containing a PJ scale was translated into 11 languages and administered to measure both perceptions of PJ as well as experiences with expressive and receptive language barriers during incarceration. Average PJ scores were in the middle of the scale, suggesting neither positive nor negative overall perceptions, although both expressive and receptive language barriers were reported by over a third of participants, together with significantly worse perceptions of PJ. Due to the protective nature of PJ, it is essential to address language barriers in prisons.
AebiMFCoccoE (2024) Prisons and prisoners in Europe 2023: Key findings of the SPACE I survey. Available at: https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2024/06/SPACE_I_2023_Key_Findings.pdf (accessed 5 September 2024).
2.
AnsemsLFMVan den BosKMakE (2020) Speaking of justice: A qualitative interview study on perceived procedural justice among defendants in Dutch criminal cases. Law & Society Review54(3): 643–678.
BakerTAbderhaldenFPAlwardLM, et al. (2021) Exploring the association between procedural justice in jails and incarcerated people’s commitment to institutional rules. Corrections6(3): 189–202.
5.
BeijersbergenKADirkzwagerAJEEichelsheimVI, et al. (2014) Procedural justice and prisoners’ mental health problems: A longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health24(2): 100–112.
6.
BeijersbergenKADirkzwagerAJEEichelsheimVI, et al. (2015a) Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior42(2): 196–218.
7.
BeijersbergenKADirkzwagerAJEMollemanT, et al. (2015b) Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology59(4): 337–358.
8.
BeijersbergenKADirkzwagerAJENieuwbeertaP (2016) Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior43(1): 63–82.
9.
BierieDM (2013) Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates (2000–2007). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law19(1): 15–29.
10.
BrosensD (2019) Prisoners’ participation and involvement in prison life: Examining the possibilities and boundaries. European Journal of Criminology16(4): 466–485.
11.
Brunton-SmithIMcCarthyDJ (2016) Prison legitimacy and procedural fairness: A multilevel examination of prisoners in England and Wales. Justice Quarterly33(6): 1029–1054.
12.
ButlerHDSolomonSJDeLisiM (2021) Time served in prison, in-prison experiences, and perceptions of procedural justice. Justice Quarterly38(7): 1519–1541.
13.
CampbellCMLabrecqueRMSchaeferRL, et al. (2020) Do perceptions of legitimacy and fairness matter in prison? Examining how procedural and distributive justice relate to misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior47(12): 1630–1653.
14.
CrouxFDe DonderLClaesB, et al. (2023a) Peer support as a bridge for participation in prison activities and services: A qualitative study with foreign national prisoners. Criminology & Criminal Justice23(1): 39–59.
15.
CrouxFVandeveldeSClaesB, et al. (2023b) An appreciative inquiry into foreign national prisoners’ participation in prison activities: The role of language. European Journal of Criminology20(1): 251–269.
16.
Fitzalan HowardFWakelingH (2020) People in prisons’ perceptions of procedural justice in England and Wales. Criminal Justice and Behavior47(12): 1654–1676.
17.
FolgerRRosenfieldDGroveJ, et al. (1979) Effects of ‘voice’ and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(12): 2253–2261.
18.
FrankeDBierieDMackenzieDL (2010) Legitimacy in corrections: A randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology & Public Policy9(1): 89–117.
19.
HaytonJCAllenDGScarpelloV (2004) Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods7(2): 191–205.
20.
HendersonHWellsWMaguireER, et al. (2010) Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior37(4): 384–399.
21.
IversenVCMangerudWLEik-NesTT, et al. (2013) Communication problems and language barriers between foreign inmates and prison officers. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies11(1): 65–77.
22.
JacksonJTylerTR (2010) Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal191: 4–10.
23.
KilliasMLukashA (2020) Migration, not migrants, is the problem: Delinquency among migrants and non-migrants in Switzerland and ex-Yugoslavia. European Journal of Criminology17(6): 896–917.
LindEATylerTR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Boston, MA: Springer US. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 (accessed 12 July 2023).
26.
Makowski-KomuraLReberothRMalikA (2020) Effects of language proficiency and communication on procedural justice in an international joint venture. Labour and Industry30(3): 233–255.
27.
MazerolleLBennettSDavisJ, et al. (2013) Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology9: 245–274.
28.
McCarthyDBrunton-SmithI (2018) The effect of penal legitimacy on prisoners’ postrelease desistance. Crime & Delinquency64(7): 917–938.
29.
NeubacherFLieblingAKantD (2023) Same problems, different concepts and language: What happens when prison climate research goes on a journey?European Journal of Criminology20(4): 1446–1463.
30.
NuñoLEMorrowWJ (2020) Assessing the process-based model of regulation within a jail setting: Arrestees’ perceptions of procedural justice, trust and obligation to obey. Journal of Crime and Justice43(5): 676–691.
31.
R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
RyanCBerginM (2022) Procedural justice and legitimacy in prisons: A review of extant empirical literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior49(2): 143–163.
34.
SonderenEVSandermanRCoyneJC (2013) Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS ONE8(7): e68967.
35.
SteinerBWooldredgeJ (2018) Prison officer legitimacy, their exercise of power, and inmate rule breaking. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal56(4): 750–779.
36.
TylerTR (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice30: 283–358.
Van GinnekenEFJCPalmenH (2023) Is there a relationship between prison conditions and recidivism?Justice Quarterly40(1): 106–128.
39.
Van HallMDirkzwagerAJEVan Der LaanPH, et al. (2023a) Differential effects of procedural justice? Examining heterogeneity in the perceptions and effects of procedural justice across first-time and recurrent detainees. Crime & Delinquency. (Accessed 4 September 2024).
40.
Van HallMDirkzwagerAJEVan Der LaanPH, et al. (2023b) Exploring the linkage between changes in detainees’ perceptions of procedural justice and changes in misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law30(10): 1467–1492.
41.
Van HallMVan Der LaanPHNieuwbeertaP, et al. (2024) Procedural justice in their eyes: A qualitative interview study among detainees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X241234857 (accessed 5 August 2024).
42.
WaltersGDBolgerPC (2019) Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology15(3): 341–372.
43.
WeijtersBBaumgartnerH (2012) Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research49(5): 737–747.
44.
WestrheimKMangerT (2014) Iraqi prisoners in Norway: Educational background, participation, preferences and barriers to education. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry1(1): 6–19.
