The European Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, the Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)8 concerning restorative justice in criminal matters, and the recently updated United Nations Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes testify to the increasing policy recognition of restorative justice at the international level. And yet, despite the vast and burgeoning literature on restorative justice, limited research and critical analysis have been conducted on policies, and even less on international policies and instruments. As a result, we know little about how restorative justice is framed within policy and how such framings could contribute towards the development of this field in practice. Addressing this gap, this article seeks to understand the ways in which restorative justice is construed within international policies and their conditions of possibility, using a ‘policy-as-discourse’ analytical approach. The article also elicits implications for the study of the relationships between restorative justice policy and practice and for future research on the institutionalization of this ‘new’ frontier of penality internationally.
AertsenI (2017) Recalibrating victimhood through restorative justice: Perspectives from Europe. Restorative Justice5(3): 352–367.
2.
AertsenI (2019) Een nieuwe Aanbeveling van de Raad van Europa: Naar een duurzame verankering van het herstelrecht?Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht1(19): 33–47.
AlexanderM (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness. New York: New Press.
5.
BacchiC (2000) Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education21(1): 45–57.
6.
BacchiC (2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?Australia: Pearson.
7.
BacchiCGoodwinS (2016) Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BianchiH (1986) Abolition: Assensus and sanctuary. In: BianchiHVan SwaaningenR (eds) Abolitionism: Towards a Non-repressive Approach to Crime. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 113–126.
9.
BianchiH (1994) Justice as Sanctuary: Toward a New System of Crime Control. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
10.
BladJ (2015) The politics of restorative justice. Restorative Justice3(1): 1–5.
11.
BlaggH (2017) Doing restorative justice ‘otherwise’: Decolonising practices in the global South. In: AertsenIPaliB (eds) Critical Restorative Justice. London: Hart Publishing, 61–78.
12.
BletsasABeasleyC (2012) Introduction. In: BletsasABeasleyC (eds) Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press, 1–9.
13.
BlumerH (1971) Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems18(3): 298–306.
14.
BraithwaiteJ (2002) Setting standards for restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology42(3): 563–577.
15.
ChristieN (1977) Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1–15.
16.
ChristieN (1986) Suitable enemies. In: BianchiHVan SwaaningenR (eds) Abolitionism: Towards a Non-repressive Approach to Crime. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 43–54.
17.
ChristieN (2013) Words on words. Restorative Justice: An International Journal1(1): 15–20.
18.
ChristieN (2015) Widening the net. Restorative Justice: An International Journal3(1): 109–113.
19.
CrawfordANewburnT (2003) Youth Offending and Restorative Justice: Implementing Reform in Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
20.
DavisA (2003) Are Prisons Obsolete?New York: Seven Stories Press.
21.
DeleuzeG (2006) Postscript on the societies of control. In: WilsonDNorrisC (eds) Surveillance, Crime and Social Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, 35–39.
22.
DünkelFGrzywa-HoltenJHorsfieldP (2015) Restorative justice and mediation in penal matters in Europe – comparative overview. In: DünkelFGrzywa-HoltenJHorsfieldP (eds) Restorative Justice and Mediation in Penal Matters. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, 1015–1096.
23.
ErbeC (2004) Chapter 23. What is the role of professionals in restorative justice? In: ZehrHToewsB (eds) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan, 289–298.
24.
FossEMPaliB (2018) Restorative justice in societies of control. In: PaliBAertsenI (eds) Restoring Justice and Security in Intercultural Europe. Routledge: London, 182–198.
25.
GallieWB (1962) Essentially contested concepts. In: BlackM (ed.) The Importance of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 121–146.
26.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
GavrielidesT (2008) Restorative justice – The perplexing concept: Conceptual fault- lines and power battles within the restorative justice movement. Criminology and Criminal Justice Journal8(2): 165–183.
28.
GavrielidesT (2014) Bringing race relations into the restorative justice debate: An alternative and personalized vision of ‘the Other.’Journal of Black Studies45(3): 216–246.
29.
GavrielidesT (2015) Repositioning restorative justice in Europe. Victims and Offenders11(1): 71–86.
30.
GavrielidesT (2017) Collapsing the labels ‘victim’ and ‘offender’ in the Victims’ Directive and the paradox of restorative justice. Restorative Justice5(3): 368–381.
31.
GrayBLauderdaleP (2007) The great circle of justice: North American Indigenous justice and contemporary restoration programs. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice10(2): 215–225.
32.
HanakGStehrJSteinertH (1989) Aergernisse und Lebenskatastrophen. Bielefeld: AJZ-Verlag.
33.
HulsmanL (1986) Critical criminology and the concept of crime. Contemporary Crisis10(1): 63–80.
34.
HulsmanL (1991) Alternatives to criminal justice: Decriminalization and depenalization. In: LasocikZPlatekMRzeplinskaI (eds) Abolitionism in History: On Another Way of Thinking. Warsaw: Institute of Social Prevention and Resocialisation, 47–62.
JohnstoneG (2012) The standardisation of restorative justice. In: GavrielidesT (ed.) Rights & Restoration Within Youth Justice. Whitby: de Sitter Publications.
37.
KernerH (2013) Establishing new minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (Directive 2012/29/EU): A promising step also for the further development of restorative justice initiatives and institutions in Europe. Restorative Justice1(3): 430–437.
38.
KoenR (2013) All roads lead to property: Pashukanis, Christie, and the theory of restorative justice. PER / PELJ (16)3: 188–235.
39.
LaurieEMaglioneG (2020) The politics of the electronic monitoring of offenders in context: From policy to political logics. Critical Criminology28(4): 685–702.
40.
LauwaertK (2013) Restorative justice in the 2012 EU Victims Directive: A right to quality service, but no right to equal access for victims of crime. Restorative Justice1(3): 414–425.
41.
L’HuillierJ (2007) The Quality of Penal Mediation in Europe. Strasbourg: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ).
LippensR (2017) What Pollock and Rothko may have announced and restorative justice may have to deal with: Sovereign victim culture. Restorative Justice5(3): 455–467.
44.
MaglioneG (2017a) Embodied victims. An archaeology of the ‘ideal victim’ of Restorative Justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice17(4): 401–417.
45.
MaglioneG (2017b) Communities at large. An archaeological analysis of the ‘community’ within restorative justice policy and laws. Critical Criminology25(3): 453–469.
46.
MaglioneG (2017c) Immature offenders. A critical history of the representations of the offender in Restorative Justice. Contemporary Justice Review21(1): 44–59.
47.
MaglioneG (2019a) The political rationality of restorative justice. Theoretical Criminology23(4): 545–562.
48.
MaglioneG (2019b) The restorative justice apparatus: A critical analysis of the historical emergence of restorative justice. Social & Legal Studies28(5): 650–674.
49.
MaglioneG (2020a) Restorative justice policy in context. A legal-archaeological analysis. International Journal for the Semiotic of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09747-0.
50.
MaglioneG (2020b) Restorative justice, crime victims and penal welfarism. Mapping and contextualising restorative justice policy in Scotland. Social & Legal Studies. First published online October 11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920965669.
51.
MaglioneG (2020c) Restorative justice, penal policy and the state. Untimely objections against the institutionalisation of restorative justice. British Journal of Community Justice17(1): 5–22.
MathiesenT (1974) The Politics of Abolition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
PaliBPelikanC (2014) Con-texting restorative justice and abolitionism: Exploring the potential and limits of restorative justice as an alternative discourse to criminal justice. Restorative Justice2: 142–164.
55.
PavlichG (1996) Justice Fragmented: Mediating Community Disputes under Postmodern Conditions. London: Routledge.
56.
PavlichG (2005) Governing Paradoxes of Restorative Justice. London: Routledge.
57.
PavlichG (2018) Transforming powers and restorative justice. In: GavrielidesT (ed.) Routledge International Handbook of Restorative Justice. London: Routledge, 462–475.
58.
PavlichGThorlaksonL (2017) Recalibrating victimhood in the European Union and Canada. Restorative Justice5(3): 345–351.
59.
PelikanC (2003) Follow-up study of Recommendation No R(99)19 of the Council of Europe. Newsletter of the European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice4(2): 6–7.
60.
PelikanC (2004) The impact of Council of Europe Recommendation No. R (99) 19 on mediation in penal matters. In: Council of Europe, Crime Policy in Europe: Good Practices and Promising Examples. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 49–74.
61.
PoamaA (2015) Restorative justice: The institutional turn. Raisons politiques59(3): 7–16.
62.
SalmJCoelhoAM (2017) Revisiting the governing paradoxes of restorative justice: A comparative critical discourse analysis of the Ibero-American and Belgian declarations on juvenile restorative justice. Restorative Justice5(3): 420–440.
SmithCJ (2005) International policy formation: The development of restorative justice policy within the United Nations. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research11(1): 29–49.
65.
StrangHBraithwaiteJ (eds) (2001) Restorative Justice and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
SuzukiMWoodWR (2017) Co-option, coercion and compromise: Restorative justice in Victoria, Australia. Contemporary Justice Review20(2): 274–292.
67.
TauriJM (2009) An indigenous perspective on the standardisation of restorative justice in New Zealand and Canada. Indigenous Policy Journal20(3): 1–24.
68.
TauriJM (2017) Indigenous peoples and the globalisation of crime control. Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict and World Order43(3): 46–67.
WillemsensJ (2008). Restorative Justice: An Agenda for Europe. The Role of the European Union in the Further Development of Restorative Justice. Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.
71.
Wilson GilmoreR (2007) Golden Gulag. Oakland: University of California Press.
72.
WoodWRSuzukiM (2016) Four challenges in the future of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders11(1): 149–172.
73.
WoolfordARatnerRS (2010) Disrupting the informal–formal justice complex: On the transformative potential of civil mediation, restorative justice and reparations politics. Contemporary Justice Review13(1): 5–17.
74.
ZehrH (2015) Changing Lenses: Restorative Justice for Our Times (25th anniversary edn). Harrisonburg: Herald Press.
75.
ZehrHToewsB (2004) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
76.
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHARecommendation CM/Rec(2018)8 of the Committee of Ministers to member States concerning restorative justice in criminal matters, adopted 3 October 2018.
77.
Recommendation No. R(99)19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning mediation in penal matters, adopted 15 September 1999.
78.
UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Resolution 2002/12: ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters’, adopted 24 July 2002, E/RES/2002/12. URL (accessed 20 April 2021): https://www.refworld.org/docid/46c455820.html.
79.
UNODC (2006) Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes. New York: United Nations.
80.
UNODC (2020) Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes (Second Edition). United Nations: Vienna.
