The Good Lives Model and restorative justice, although both innovative practices with a number of common traits, interests and aims, have been developing in parallel or even at odds with each other for a number of years. As a consequence, they have rarely been examined as possibly complementary and of use to each other. In this article we aim to explore these innovative practices individually and to look at how they might work together to address the harm in a positive and constructive way for all stakeholders. We examine the possibilities of how a new approach to criminology, a criminology of trust, could be further developed through their lens and their possible complementarity.
AndrewsDABontaJ (2010) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th edn). Cincinnati: Anderson.
2.
AngelCShermanLStrangHArielBBennettSInkpenNKeaneARichmondT (2014) Short-term effects of restorative justice conferences on post-traumatic stress symptoms among robbery and burglary victims: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology10: 291–307.
3.
BazemoreGO’BrienS (2002) The quest for a restorative model of rehabilitation: Theory-for-practice and practice-for-theory. In: WalgraveL (ed.) Restorative Justice and the Law. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 31–67.
4.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2017) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (6th edn). New York: Routledge.
5.
BontaJJessemanRRuggeTCormierR (2006) Restorative justice and recidivism: Promises made, promises kept? In: SullivanDTifftL (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge, 108–120.
6.
BraithwaiteJ (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BraithwaiteJ (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BraithwaiteJPettitP (1990) Not Just Desert. A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BraithwaiteJRocheD (2001) Responsibility and restorative justice. In: BazemoreGSchiffM (eds) Restorative Community Justice. Repairing Harm and Transforming Communities. Cincinnati: Anderson, 63–84.
10.
CacioppoJPatrickW (2008) Loneliness. Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. New York: Norton & Company.
11.
CalverleyAFarrallS (2011) The sensual dynamics of processes of personal reform: Desistance from crime and the role of emotions. In: KarstedtSLoaderIStrangH (eds) Emotions, Crime and Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 81–100.
12.
ChristieN (1977) Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1–15.
13.
CollinsR (2004) Interactional Ritual Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
De WaalF (2009) The Age of Empathy. Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York: Harmony Books.
15.
DignanJ (2002) Restorative justice and the law: The case for an integrated, systemic approach. In: WalgraveL (ed.) Restorative Justice and the Law. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 168–190.
16.
FreedenM (1991) Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
HarrisNWalgraveLBraithwaiteJ (2004) Emotional dynamics in restorative conferences. Theoretical Criminology8(2): 191–210.
19.
HartSDSturmeyPLoganCMcMurranM (2011) Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health10: 118–126. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2011.577137.
20.
HayesHDalyK (2004) Conferencing and re-offending in Queensland. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology37(2): 167–191.
21.
HoyleC (2010) The case for restorative justice. In: CunneenCHoyleC, Debating Restorative Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1–100.
22.
LevinasE (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. Translated from Totalité et infini: Essai sur l’extériorité (1961).
23.
LoaderI (2014) Afterthoughts. Security, anti-security, positive security. In: SchuilenburgMVan StedenROude BreuilB (eds) Positive Criminology: Reflections on Care, Belonging and Security. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 145–152.
24.
McColdP (2000) Towards a holistic vision of restorative juvenile justice: A reply to the maximalist model. Contemporary Justice Review3(4): 357–414.
25.
MarunaSWrightSBrownJVan MarleFDevlinRLiddleM (2006) Youth Conferencing as Shame Management: Results of a Long-term Follow-up Study. Belfast: Youth Justice Agency / Youth Conferencing Service (ARCS).
26.
MaxwellGKingiVRobertsonJMorrisACunninghamC (2004) Achieving Effective Outcomes in Youth Justice. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
27.
PurvisMWardTShawS (2013) Applying the Good Lives Model to the Case Management of Sexual Offenders: A Practical Guide for Probation Officers, Parole Officers, and Case Workers. Brandon: Safer Society Press.
28.
PutnamR (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
SchuilenburgMVan StedenROude BreuilB (eds) (2014) Positive Criminology: Reflections on Care, Belonging and Security. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
32.
SparksR (2011) Divided sympathies: David Hume and contemporary criminology. In: KarstedtSLoaderIStrangH (eds) Emotions, Crime and Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 317–330.
33.
TylerT (2006) Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues62(2): 307–326.
34.
Van CampT (2014) Victims of Violence and Restorative Practices. London: Routledge.
WalgraveL (2011) Investigating the potentials of restorative justice practice. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy36: 91–139.
37.
WalgraveL (2016) Positive criminology, criminology of trust and restorative justice. Restorative Justice. An International Journal4(3): 424–434.
38.
WalkerMU (2006) Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WardT (2010) The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Basic assumptions, etiological commitments, and practice implications. In: McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 41–64.
40.
WardT (2013) Addressing the dual relationship problem in forensic and correctional practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior18: 92–100.
41.
WardTBrownM (2004) The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law10: 243–257.
42.
WardTCarterE (in press) The classification of offending and crime related problems: A functional perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law.
43.
WardTFortuneC-A (2016) The role of dynamic risk factors in the explanation of offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior29: 79–88.
44.
WardTLanglandsR (2009) Repairing the rupture: Restorative justice and offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior14: 205–214.
45.
WardTMarunaS (2007) Rehabilitation: Beyond the Risk Paradigm. London: Routledge.
46.
WardTSyversenK (2009) Vulnerable agency and human dignity: An ethical framework for forensic practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior14: 94–105.
47.
WardTFoxAGarberM (2014) Restorative justice, offender rehabilitation, and desistance. Restorative Justice: An International Journal2: 24–42.
48.
WardTGannonTFortuneC (2015) Restorative Justice informed moral acquaintance: Resolving the dual relationship problem in forensic and correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior42: 45–57.
49.
ZehrHMikaH (1998) Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review1(1): 47–55.
50.
ZinsstagEKeenanM (eds) (2017) Sexual Violence and Restorative Justice: Legal, Social and Therapeutical Dimensions. London: Routledge.
51.
ZinsstagEVanfraechemI (eds) (2012) Conferencing and Restorative Justice: International Practices and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
