Since 2014 it has been possible to apply juvenile criminal law to young adults aged from 18 up to and including 22 years old in the Netherlands. This policy change is referred to as the Adolescent Criminal Law (ACL). According to the theory behind ACL, providing special treatment within the juvenile justice system to young adults during their transition into adulthood could reduce recidivism. In order to determine the relevance and impact of ACL regarding the application of juvenile sanctions to young adults, in this study a ‘Recently Introduced Policy instrument’ (RIPI) evaluation was conducted. The results suggest that applying juvenile justice sanctions to young adults could offer opportunities to cut short criminal careers and reduce crime amongst young adults. In addition, we found that the proportion of juvenile sanctions applied to young adults has increased despite the overall crime drop amongst young adults. Implications of our findings are discussed.
BloklandA (2005) Crime over the life span. Trajectories of criminal behavior in Dutch offenders. Dissertation, University of Leiden.
2.
BoendermakerLGerritsGMVisserAHarderATKalverboerME (2014) Zorgaanbod voor 18- tot 23-jarigen in de justitiële jeugdinrichtingen [Care for 18–23-year olds in juvenile correctional settings]. Groningen: University of Groningen.
3.
BuysseWScherdersS (2015) Bruikbaarheid van het wegingskader ASR. Amsterdam: DSP-groep.
4.
BuysseWHilhorstNAbrahamMLoefL (2013) Evaluatie pilot adolescentenstrafrecht [Evaluation pilot ACL]. Amsterdam: DSP-groep.
5.
CollinsELenningsC (2013) Coming of age: Legal and psychologcial implications related to juvenile vulnerability and incarceration. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law20(6): 824–833.
6.
Commissie-Anneveldt (1982) Sanctierecht voor jeugdigen. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.
7.
Commissie-De-Jong (1953) Rapport betreffende de strafrechtelijke behandeling van jeugdige personen. Amsterdam: Commissie van het Nederlands Genootschap tot Reclassering.
8.
Commissie-Overwater (1951) Rapport van de commissie ingesteld met het doel van advies tedienen over de vraag in welke richting het rijkstucht- en opvoedingswezen en in verband daarmede het kinderstrafrecht zich zullen moeten ontwikkelen. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.
9.
Commissie-Wiarda (1971) Jeugdbeschermingsrecht. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.
10.
DoreleijersTAHFokkensJW (2010) Minderjarigen en jongvolwassenen: Pleidooi voor een evidence based strafrecht [Juveniles and young adults: A plea for an evidence based penal law]. Rechtstreeks2: 9–46.
11.
DünkelFPruinI (2012) Young adult offenders in juvenile and criminal justice systems in Europe. In: LöselFBottomsAEFarringtonDP (eds) Young Adult Offenders. Lost in Transition?. London: Routledge, 11–38.
12.
FarringtonDP (1986) Age and crime. In: TonryMMorrisN (eds) Crime and Justice. An Annual Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 189–250.
13.
FarringtonDPLoeberRHowellJC (2012) Young adult offenders. The need for more effective legislative options and justice processing. Criminology and Public Policy11(4): 729–750.
14.
FarringtonDPLoeberRHowellJC (2017) Increasing the minimum age for adult court. Criminology and Public Policy16(1): 83–92.
15.
HerweijerM (2011) De leeftijdsgrenzen in het jeugdstrafrecht en het jongvolwassenenstrafrecht [Age groups in juvenile and adult crime]. Proces90(4): 212–223.
16.
HillJMBloklandAAJVan der GeestV (2018) Risk factors for self-reported delinquency in emerging adulthood. European Journal of Criminology15(5): 544–566.
17.
HowardPClarkDGarnhamN (2003) Evaluation and Validation of the Offender Assessment System (OASys). London: HM Prison Service and National Probation Service.
18.
JongebreurWReitsmaJ (2014) Actualisatie impactanalyse Adolescentenstrafrecht [Actualisation impact analysis ACL]. The Hague/Barneveld: Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie / Significant.
LeeuwFL (2003) Reconstructing program theories: Methods available and problems to be solved. American Journal of Evaluation24(1): 5–20.
21.
LiefaardT (2012) Juveniles in transition from juvenile justice to adult criminal justice. In LoeberRHoeveMSlotNWVan der LaanPH (eds) Persisters and Desisters in Crime from Adolescence into Adulthood. Explanation, Prevention and Punishment. Farnham: Ashgate, 159–201.
22.
LoeberRFarringtonDP (2012) Age–crime curve. Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12–18.
23.
LoeberRHoeveMSlotNWVan der LaanPH (2012) Persisters and Desisters in Crime from Adolescence into Adulthood. Explanation, Prevention and Punishment. Ashgate: Farnham.
24.
MatthewsSSchiraldiVChesterL (2018) Youth justice in Europe: Experience of Germany, the Netherlands, and Croatia in providing developmentally appropriate responses to emerging adults in the criminal justice system. Justice Evaluation Journal, 1(1), 59–81.
25.
MickwitzP (2003) A framework for evaluating environment policy instruments. Evaluation9(4): 415–436.
26.
MijnarendsEMRensenER (2017) De officier van justitie en het adolescentenstrafrecht: Twee geloven op één kussen? [The Public Prosecutor and ACL]. Tijdschrift voor Familie en Jeugdrecht14: 1–8.
27.
MonahanKCSteinbergLPiqueroAR (2015) Juvenile justice policy and practice: A developmental perspective. Crime and Justice44(1): 577–619.
28.
MonahanKCSteinbergLCauffmanEMulveyEP (2013) Psychosocial (im)maturity from adolescence to early adulthood: Distinguishing between adolescence-limited and persisting antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology25: 1093–1105.
29.
NVvP (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie) (2012) Richtlijn psychiatrisch onderzoek en rapportage in strafzaken [Directives regarding psychiatric research and reports in criminal cases]. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychiatrie.
30.
OzkanT (2016) Reoffending among serious juvenile offenders. A developmental perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice46: 18–31.
PollittCBouckaertG (2004) Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
PriorDFarrowKHughesNKellyGMandersGWhiteSWilkinsonB (2011) Maturity, Young Adults and Criminal Justice: A Literature Review. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
RapSWeijersI (2014) The Effective Youth Court. Juvenile Justice Procedures in Europe. Portland, OR: Eleven International Publishing.
40.
RokvenJBeerthuizenMGCJVan der LaanAM (2018) Internationale ontwikkelingen in de geregistreerde jeugdcriminaliteit [International trends in juvenile crime]. In: Van der LaanAMBeerthuizenMGCJ (eds) Monitor Jeugdcriminaliteit 2017. The Hague: WODC/CBS, 97–116.
41.
RSJ [Council of Criminal Justice and Protection of Juveniles] (2011) Het Jeugdstrafproces: toekomstbestendig! [Juvenile justice processing: future proof]. The Hague: Raad voor Strafrechtstoepassing en Jeugdbescherming.
42.
SchiraldiVWesternBBradnerK (2015) Community-based responses to justice-involved young adults. New Thinking in Community Corrections1 (September): 2–24.
Staatscourant (2014) Richtlijn en kader strafvordering jeugd en adolescenten, inclusief strafmaten Halt [Directives regarding criminal processing of juveniles and adolescents]. Government Gazette no. 8284. ’s Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.
45.
SteffensmeierDJAllanEAHarerMDStreifelC (1989) Age and the distribution of crime. American Journal of Sociology94(4): 803–831.
46.
SteinbergL (2013) The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents’ criminal culpability. Nature Reviews | Neuroscience14 (July): 513–518.
47.
SteinbergLCauffmanE (1996) Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior20(3), 249–272.
48.
TonryM (2014) Why crime rates are falling throughout the Western world. In: TonryM (ed.) Why Crime Rates Fall and Why They Don’t. Crime & Justice Vol. 43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–64.
49.
Van der LaanAMBeerthuizenMGCJ (2018) Monitor jeugdcriminaliteit. Ontwikkelingen in de jeugdcriminaliteit 2000 tot 2017. The Hague: WODC/CBS.
50.
Van der LaanAMGoudriaanH (2016) Monitor jeugdcriminaliteit. Ontwikkelingen in de jeugdcriminaliteit 1997 tot 2015. The Hague: WODC/CBS.
51.
Van der LaanPHVan der LaanAMHoeveMBlomMLametWHLoeberR (2012) Offending and justice response at the juvenile–adult interface. In: LoeberRHoeveMSlotNWVan der LaanPH (eds) Persisters and Desisters in Crime from Adolescence into Adulthood. Explanation, Prevention and Punishment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 201–238.
