Although the prevalence of cybercrime has increased rapidly, most victims do not report these offenses to the police. This is the first study that compares associations between victim characteristics and crime reporting behavior for traditional crimes versus cybercrimes. Data from four waves of a Dutch cross-sectional population survey are used (N = 97,186 victims). Results show that cybercrimes are among the least reported types of crime. Moreover, the determinants of crime reporting differ between traditional crimes and cybercrimes, between different types of cybercrime (that is, identity theft, consumer fraud, hacking), and between reporting cybercrimes to the police and to other organizations. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
BaumerEPLauritsenJL (2010) Reporting crime to the police, 1973–2005: A multivariate analysis of long-term trends in the National Crime Survey (NCS) and National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology48(1): 131–185.
2.
BoesSLeukfeldtER (2017) Fighting cybercrime: A joint effort. In: HakimSClarkRM (eds) Cyber-physical Security at the State, Provincial and Local Level: Protecting Critical Infrastructure. New York: Springer Science.
3.
BowlesRReyesMGGaroupaN (2009) Crime reporting decisions and the costs of crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research15(4): 365–377.
4.
Bra (2015) Utsatthet för brott 2014. Resultat från Nationella trygghetsundersökningen [Victimization report 2014. Results from the national crime survey]. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet (Bra).
5.
ButtonMLewisCTapleyJ (2014) Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal27(1): 36–54.
6.
CopesHKerleyKRHuffRKaneJ (2010) Differentiating identity theft: An exploratory study of victims using a national victimization survey. Journal of Criminal Justice38(5): 1045–1052.
7.
CrossCRichardsKSmithRG (2016) The Reporting Experiences and Support Needs of Victims of Online Fraud. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Report no. 518. Canberra, Augustus.
8.
DomenieMLeukfeldtERvan WilsemJAJansenJStolWP (2013) Victimisation in a Digitised Society. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
9.
JansenFKoopsEJVan LentheJMaasEPlankenESchermerBStolWPVerhoevenM (2017) Tackling cybercrime. In: LeukfeldtER (ed.) Research Agenda. The Human Factor in Cybercrime and cybersecurity. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
10.
GoudriaanH (2006) Reporting crime: Effects of social context on the decision of victims to notify the police. PhD thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
11.
GoudriaanHLynchJPNieuwbeertaP (2004) Reporting to the police in western nations: A theoretical analysis of the effects of social context. Justice Quarterly21(4): 933–969.
12.
GoudriaanHWittebroodKNieuwbeertaP (2006) Neighbourhood characteristics and reporting crime effects of social cohesion, confidence in police effectiveness and socio-economic disadvantage. British Journal of Criminology46(4): 719–742.
13.
GutierrezCMKirkDS (2017) Silence speaks: The relationship between immigration and the underreporting of crime. Crime & Delinquency63(8). doi:0011128715599993.
14.
GuzyNHirtenlehnerH (2015) Trust in the German police: Determinants and consequences for reporting behavior. In: MeškoGTankebeJ (eds) Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 203–229.
15.
HaleviTLewisJMemonN (2013) A pilot study of cyber security and privacy related behavior and personality traits. In: WWW 2013 Companion – Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 737–744.
16.
HartTCColavitoV (2011) College student victims and reporting crime to the police: The influence of collective efficacy. Western Criminology Review12(3): 1–19.
17.
HuffRDesiletsCKaneJ (2010) National Public Survey on White Collar Crime. Fairmont, VA: National White Collar Crime Center.
18.
KhondakerMIWuYLambertEG (2017) Bangladeshi immigrants’ willingness to report crime in New York City. Policing and Society27(2): 188–204. doi:10.1080/10439463.2015.1040795
19.
LeukfeldtERJansenJVan WilsemJADomenieMMLStolWP (2013a) Slachtofferschap van delicten met een digitale component en de rol van politie [Victimization of offenses with a digital component and the role of the police]. Tijdschrift voor de Politie75(2): 30–34.
20.
LeukfeldtERVeenstraSStolWP (2013b) High volume cyber crime and the organization of the police. The results of two empirical studies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Cyber Criminology7(1): 1–17.
21.
NgoFTPaternosterR (2011) Cybercrime victimization: An examination of individual and situational level factors. International Journal of Cyber Criminology5(1): 773–793.
22.
ONS (2016) Crime in England and Wales: Year Ending December 2015. London: Office for National Statistics.
23.
RobertPZaubermanRMiceliLNévanenSDidierE (2010) The victim’s decision to report offences to the police in France: Stating losses or expressing attitudes. International Review of Victimology17(2): 179–207.
24.
RubackRBGreenbergMSWestcottDR (1984) Social influence and crime-victim decision making. Journal of Social Issues40(1): 51–76.
25.
SchneblySM (2008) The influence of community-oriented policing on crime-reporting behavior. Justice Quarterly25(2): 223–251.
26.
SingerSI (1988) The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology4(3): 289–302.
27.
SkoganWG (1976) Citizen reporting of crime. Some national panel data. Criminology13(4): 535–549.
28.
SkoganWG (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency21(2): 113–137.
29.
Statistic Netherlands (2016) Veiligheidsmonitor 2015 [Safety and Security Monitor 2015]. The Hague: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
30.
TarlingRMorrisK (2010) Reporting crime to the police. British Journal of Criminology50(3): 474–490.
31.
TolsmaJ (2011) Aangiftebereidheid: Welke overwegingen spelen een rol bij de beslissing om wel of niet aangifte te doen? [Which considerations play a role in the decision to report a crime or not?] Cahiers Politiestudies2(4): 11–32.
32.
TolsmaJBlaauwJte GrotenhuisM (2012) When do people report crime to the police? Results from a factorial survey design in the Netherlands 2010. Journal of Experimental Criminology8(2): 117–134.
33.
TorrenteDGalloPOltraC (2017) Comparing crime reporting factors in EU countries. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research23(2): 153–174. doi:10.1007/s10610-016-9310-5
34.
Toutenhoofd-VisserMHVeenstraSDomenieMMLLeukfeldtERStolWP (2009) Politie en Cybercrime. Intake en Eerste Opvolging. Een onderzoek naar de intake van het werkaanbod cybercrime door de politie [Police and Cybercrime. Intake and First Follow-up. A Study on the Intake of the Workload of Cybercrime by the Police]. Leeuwarden: NHL.
35.
Van de WeijerSGABernascoW (2016) Aangifte- en meldingsbereidheid: Trends en determinanten [The Willingness to Report Crimes: Trends and Determinants]. Report. The Hague: WODC.
36.
Van de WeijerSGALeukfeldtER (2017) Big five personality traits of cybercrime victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking20(7): 407–412.
37.
Van WilsemJ (2011) ‘Bought it, but never got it’: Assessing risk factors for online consumer fraud victimization. European Sociological Review29(2): 168–178.
38.
Van WilsemJ (2013) Hacking and harassment – Do they have something in common? Comparing risk factors for online victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice29: 437–453.
39.
WallDS (2010) Policing cybercrimes: Situating the public police in networks of security within cyberspace (revised May2010). Police Practice & Research: An International Journal8(2): 183–205.
40.
ZaykowskiH (2010) Racial disparities in hate crime reporting. Violence and Victims25(3): 378–394.
41.
ZaykowskiH (2013) Reporting physical assault: How experiences with violence influence adolescents’ response to victimization. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice11(1): 44–59.
