This study scrutinizes gender differences in adolescent problem behaviour and its potential determinants, simultaneously taking into account the individual and contextual level, including personality, family and country characteristics. Using the 2010 EU Kids Online Survey, we estimate multilevel models on 18,027 individuals from 24 European countries. In line with earlier research, we find that boys engage more in adolescent problem behaviour than girls. The gender gap is largely explained by personality traits, such as self-control. Whereas the influence of self-control does not differ between boys and girls, the association between conduct problems and problem behaviour is stronger for boys than for girls. Family factors are relevant but not gender specific in their impact on problem behaviour. European countries differ with respect to the gender gap in adolescent problem behaviour, which is partly explained by the societal level of gender inequality.
AgnewRMatthewsSKBucherJWelcherANKeyesC (2008) Socioeconomic status, economic problems and delinquency. Youth and Society40: 159–181.
2.
AmatoPR (2001) Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology15(3): 355–370.
3.
ArnettJ (1992) Reckless behaviour in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review12: 339–373.
4.
BarrettAETurnerJ (2006) Family structure and substance use problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Examining explanations for the relationship. Addiction101(1): 109–120.
5.
BelknapJ (2014) The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
6.
BronfenbrennerU (1986) Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology22(6): 723.
7.
BurtonVSCullenFTEvansTDAlaridLFDunawayRG (1998) Gender, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency35(2): 123–147.
8.
ByrnesJPMillerDCSchaferWD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin125(3): 367.
9.
ClaesMLacourseEErcolaniAPPierroALeoneLPresaghiF (2005) Parenting, peer orientation, drug use, and antisocial behaviour in late adolescence: A cross-national study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence34(5): 401–411.
10.
CompasBEHindenBRGerhardtCA (1995) Adolescent development – Pathways and processes of risk and resilience. Annual Review of Psychology46: 265–293.
11.
CooperMLWoodPKOrcuttHK (2003) Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviours during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(2): 390–410.
12.
CurrieCGabhainnSNGodeauERobertsCSmithRCurrieDPicketWRichterMMorganABarnekowV (eds) (2008) Inequalities in Young People’s Health: HBSC International Report from the 2005/2006 Survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
13.
DonovanJEJessorR (1985) Structure of problem behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology53(6): 890.
14.
EisnerM (2002) Crime, problem drinking, and drug use: Patterns of problem behaviour in cross-national perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science580(1): 201–225.
15.
GallowayTASkarðhamarT (2010) Does parental income matter for onset of offending?European Journal of Criminology7(6): 424–441.
16.
GoodmanALampingDLPloubidisGB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology38(8): 1179–1191.
17.
GoodmanR (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry38: 581–586.
18.
Gorman-SmithDLoeberR (2005) Are developmental pathways in disruptive behaviours the same for girls and boys?Journal of Child and Family Studies14(1): 15–27.
19.
GottfredsonMRHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
GrasmickHGTittleCRBursikRJArneklevBJ (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(1): 5–29.
21.
GulloneEMooreS (2000) Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Adolescence23(4): 393–407.
22.
HadjarABaierDBoehnkeKHaganJ (2007) Juvenile delinquency and gender revisited: The family and power-control theory reconceived. European Journal of Criminology4(1): 33–58.
23.
HaganJFosterH (2003) S/he’s a rebel: Toward a sequential stress theory of delinquency and gendered pathways to disadvantage in emerging adulthood. Social Forces82(1): 53–86.
24.
HaganJSimpsonJGillisAR (1987) Class in the household: A power-control theory of gender and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 788–816.
25.
HausmannRTysonLDZahidiS (2010) The Global Gender Gap Report 2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
26.
HawkinsJDCatalanoREMillerJY (1992) Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin112(1): 64–105.
27.
HeimerK (1997) Socioeconomic status, subcultural definitions, and violent delinquency. Social Forces75(3): 799–833.
28.
HeimerKDe CosterS (1999) The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology37(2): 277–318.
29.
HirschiT (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
JessorR (1992) Risk behaviour in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Developmental Review12(4): 374–390.
31.
JessorRTurbinMSCostaFMDongQZhangHWangC (2003) Adolescent problem behaviour in China and the United States: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence13(3): 329–360.
32.
Junger-TasJRibeaudDCruyffMJ (2004) Juvenile delinquency and gender. European Journal of Criminology1(3): 333–375.
33.
KoCHYenJYYenCFChenCSWengCCChenCC (2008) The association between Internet addiction and problematic alcohol use in adolescents: The problem behavior model. CyberPsychology & Behavior11(5): 571–576.
34.
LaGrangeTCSilvermanRA (1999) Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology37(1): 41–72.
35.
LeadbeaterBJKupermincGPBlattSJHertzogC (1999) A multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology35(5): 1268–1282.
36.
LevinKAKirbyJCurrieC (2012) Adolescent risk behaviours and mealtime routines: Does family meal frequency alter the association between family structure and risk behaviour?Health Education Research27(1): 24–35.
37.
LiebigS (2012) Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett (2009): The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane, London. Social Justice Research25(1): 102–107.
38.
LivingstoneSHaddonLGörzigAÓlafssonK (2011) Technical Report and User Guide: The 2010 EU Kids Online Survey. London: EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science.
39.
MacArthurGJSmithMCMelottiRHeronJMacleodJHickmanM. . . LewisG (2012) Patterns of alcohol use and multiple risk behaviour by gender during early and late adolescence: The ALSPAC cohort. Journal of Public Health34(3): 20–30.
40.
MertonRK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
41.
MoffittTE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial-behaviour – A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4): 674–701.
42.
MoffittTECaspiARutterMSilvaPA (2001) Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour. Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
NottenN (2014) Taking risks on the World Wide Web. The impact of families and societies on adolescents’ risky online behavior. In: Van de HofSVan den BergBSchermerB (eds) Minding minors wandering the web - Regulating online child safety. IT and Law series. The Hague: Asser Press/Springer Press, pp. 105–123.
44.
O’ConnellMF (2010) Affluence versus equality? A critique of Wilkinson and Pickett’s book ‘The Spirit Level’. School of Psychology Research Collection. Dublin: University College, Dublin
45.
PattersonGRDeBarysheBRamseyE (1990) A developmental perspective on antisocial behaviour. American Psychologist44: 329–335. Reprinted in: GauvainMColeM (eds) Readings on the Development of Children, 2nd edn (1993). New York: Freeman, 263–271.
46.
PearlinLIMenaghanEGLiebermanMAMullanJT (1981) The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour22: 337–356.
47.
PickettKEMookherjeeJWilkinsonRG (2005) Adolescent birth rates, total homicides, and income inequality in rich countries. American Journal of Public Health95(7): 1181–1183.
48.
PrattTCCullenFT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology38(3): 931–964.
49.
SkarðhamarT (2009) Family dissolution and children’s criminal careers. European Journal of Criminology6(3): 203–223.
50.
SmithDAPaternosterR (1987) The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency24: 140–172.
51.
SnijdersTBoskerR (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
52.
SteketeeMJungerMJunger-TasJ (2013) Sex differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency: Females are more susceptible to poor environments; males are influenced more by low self-control. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice29(1): 88–105.
53.
StephensonMTHoyleRHPalmgreenPSlaterMD (2003) Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence72(3): 279–286.
54.
SvenssonR (2003) Gender differences in adolescent drug use the impact of parental monitoring and peer deviance. Youth and Society34(3): 300–329.
55.
TapertSFAaronsGASedlarGRBrownSA (2001) Adolescent substance use and sexual risk-taking behaviour. Journal of Adolescent Health28(3): 181–189.
56.
TittleCRWardDAGrasmickHG (2003) Gender, age, and crime/deviance: A challenge to self-control theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40(4): 426–453.
57.
UNDP [United Nations Development Programme] (2009) Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
UpchurchDMLevy-StormsLSucoffCAAneshenselCS (1998) Gender and ethnic differences in the timing of first sexual intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives30(3): 121–127.
59.
VoldGBBernardTJSnipesJB (2002) Theoretical Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
WilkinsonRGPickettKE (2009) Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology35: 493–511.
61.
WongTMLSlotboomAMBijleveldCCJH (2010) Risk factors for delinquency in adolescent and young adult females: A European review. European Journal of Criminology7(4): 266–284.
