Previous research shows that a disadvantaged school setting is associated with increased risk of adolescent delinquency. However, there is limited research on individual differences in such contextual effects. In this study, we investigated whether the association between impulsive and sensation-seeking traits and delinquency is modified by the school setting, focusing on schools’ socioeconomic and ethnic composition and average school performance. We also examined whether the association between gender and delinquency varies by school context. Participants were adolescents in ninth grade from the Stockholm School Survey (5619 pupils in 89 schools). The findings showed an attenuating effect of school advantage on adolescents’ individual risk of delinquency. Impulsive and sensation-seeking adolescents, and boys in particular, committed less crime if they attended more advantaged schools.
AndershedHKerrMStattinH. (2002) Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: A new assessment tool. In: BlaauwESheridanL (eds) Psychopaths: Current International Perspectives. The Hague: Elsevier, 131–158.
2.
BartonMSJensenBLKaufmanJM (2010) Social disorganization theory and the college campus. Journal of Criminal Justice38(3): 245–254.
3.
BotticelloAL (2009) A multilevel analysis of gender differences in psychological distress over time. Journal of Research on Adolescence19(2): 217–247.
4.
CaspiA (2000) The child is father of the man: Personality continuities from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(1): 158–172.
5.
CaspiABeggDDicksonN. (1997) Personality differences predict health-risk behaviors in young adulthood: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73(5): 1052–1063.
6.
CaspiAMoffittTESilvaPA. (1994) Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality–crime relationships across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology32(2): 163–195.
7.
DearyIJWeissABattyGD (2010) Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest11(2): 53–79.
8.
DishionTJSpracklenKMAndrewsDW. (1996) Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behaviour Therapy27: 373–390.
9.
EklundJMaf KlintebergB (2005) Personality characteristics as risk indications of alcohol use and violent behaviour in male and female adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences26(2): 63–73.
10.
EklundJMFreidenfelt LiljebergJaf KlintebergB (2011) Delinquent behaviour patterns in adolescence: Development and associated personality traits. Personality and Mental Health5: 169–185.
11.
FaganAAWrightEM (2012) The effects of neighborhood context on youth violence and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice10(1): 64–82.
12.
FergussonDMVitaroFWannerB. (2007) Protective and compensatory factors mitigating the influence of deviant friends on delinquent behaviours during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence30(1): 33–50.
13.
GottfredsonDCMcNeilRJGottfredsonGD (1991) Social area influences on delinquency: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency28(2): 197–226.
14.
GroisinL (2004) Skolklimat, prestation och anpassning i 21 mellan- och 20 högstadieskolor [School climate, performance and adjustment in 21 intermediate and 20 senior level schools]. Report, Stockholm University.
15.
HaynieDL (2002) Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(2): 99–134.
16.
HirschiT (2009) Causes of Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
17.
JonesSLynamDR (2009) In the eye of the impulsive beholder: The interaction between impulsivity and perceived informal social control on offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior36(3): 307–321.
18.
KirkDS (2009) Unraveling the contextual effects on student suspension and juvenile arrest: The independent and interdependent influences of school, neighborhood, and family social controls. Criminology47(2): 479–520.
19.
Kölegård StjärneMFritzellJBrännström. (2007) Boendesegregationens utveckling och konsekvenser [Residential segregation: Trends and consequences]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift2–3: 153–178.
20.
KronemanLLoeberRHipwellAE (2004) Is neighborhood context differently related to externalizing problems and delinquency for girls compared with boys?Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review7(2): 109–122.
21.
KruegerRFCaspiAMoffittTE. (1996) Personality traits are differentially linked to mental disorders: A multitrait-multidiagnosis study of an adolescent birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology105(3): 299–312.
22.
KruegerRFSchmuttePSCaspiA. (1994) Personality traits are linked to crime among men and women: Evidence from a birth cohort. Journal of Abnormal Psychology103(2): 328–338.
23.
KupermincGPLeadbeaterBJBlattSJ (2001) School social climate and individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students. Journal of School Psychology. Special Issue: Schooling and Mental Health Issues39(2): 141–159.
24.
LaGrangeTCSilvermanRA (1999) Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the General Theory of Crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology37(1): 41–72.
25.
LeTNStockdaleGD (2011) The influence of school demographic factors and perceived student discrimination on delinquency trajectory in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health49: 407–413.
26.
LöselFFarringtonDP (2012) Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine43(2, Supplement 1): S8–S23.
27.
LynamDRCaspiAMoffittTE. (2000) The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology109(4): 563–574.
28.
MeierMHSlutskeWSArndtS. (2008) Impulsive and callous traits are more strongly associated with delinquent behavior in higher risk neighborhoods among boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology117(2): 377–385.
29.
ModinBÖstbergV (2009) School climate and psychosomatic health: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement20(4): 433–455.
30.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2010) Social rapport 2010. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
31.
NilssonAEstradaF (2009) Criminality and Life-chances: A Longitudinal Study of Crime, Childhood Circumstances and Living Conditions up to Age 48. Report, Department of Criminology, Stockholm University.
32.
OberwittlerD (2004) A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood contextual effects on serious juvenile offending: The role of subcultural values and social disorganization. European Journal of Criminology1(2): 201–235.
33.
OberwittlerD (2007) The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: A multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity. Housing Studies22(5): 781–803.
34.
PauwelsL (2011) Adolescent offending and the segregation of poverty in urban neighbourhoods and schools: An assessment of contextual effects from the standpoint of Situational Action Theory. Urban Studies Research. Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1155/2011/659768.
35.
PayneAAGottfredsonDCGottfredsonGD (2003) Schools as communities: The relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and school disorder. Criminology41(3): 749–777.
36.
PiqueroNLGoverARMacDonaldJM. (2005) The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter?Youth & Society36(3): 251–275.
37.
PoropatAE (2009) A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin135(2): 322–338.
38.
RaudenbushSWBrykASCongdonR (2004) HLM 6 for Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
39.
RumbergerRWPalardyGJ (2005) Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record107(9): 1999–2045.
40.
RutterM (1983) School effects on pupil outcomes: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development54: 1–29.
41.
SaabHKlingerD (2010) School differences in adolescent health and wellbeing: Findings from the Canadian Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study. Social Science & Medicine70(6): 850–858.
42.
SampsonRJGrovesWB (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94(4): 774–802.
43.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918–924.
44.
SchneidersJDrukkerMvan der EndeJ. (2003) Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioural problems from late childhood into early adolescence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health57(9): 699–703.
45.
SellstromEBrembergS (2006) Is there a ‘school effect’ on pupil outcomes? A review of multilevel studies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health60: 149–155.
46.
SprottJBJenkinsJMDoobAN (2000) Early Offending: Understanding the Risk and Protective Factors of Delinquency. Hull: Human Resources Development Canada Publications Centre.
47.
Stockholm Office of Research and Statistics (2008) Stockholmsenkäten 2008 – Teknisk rapport [Stockholm School Survey 2008 – Technical Report]. Report, Stockholm Office of Research and Statistics.
48.
SvanbergK (2008) Stockholmsenkätens bakgrund och genomförande. In: Stockholmsenkäten. Fördjupade analyser från 2006 års datainsamling. Report, Stockholm Prevention Centre, 6–15.
49.
SvenssonR (2003) Gender differences in adolescent drug use: The impact of parental monitoring and peer deviance. Youth & Society34(3): 300–329.
50.
Swedish National Agency for Education (2010) What Influences Educational Achievement in Swedish Schools? A Systematic Review of Different Factors: Summary Analysis. Stockholm: Fritze.
51.
Swedish National Agency for Education (2012) Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? En kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid. Stockholm: Fritze.
52.
SzulkinRJonssonJO (2007) Ethnic Segregation and Educational Outcomes in Swedish Comprehensive Schools. Report, Stockholm University Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies – SULCIS.
53.
VitaroFBrendgenMTremblayRE (2000) Influence of deviant friends on delinquency: Searching for moderator variables. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology28(4): 313–325.
54.
VitaroFTremblayREKerrM. (1997) Disruptiveness, friends’ characteristics, and delinquency in early adolescence: A test of two competing models of development. Child Development68(4): 676–689.
55.
WangM-TDishionTJ (2012) The trajectories of adolescents’ perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years. Journal of Research on Adolescence22(1): 40–53.
56.
WangM-TSelmanRLDishionTJ. (2010) A Tobit regression analysis of the covariation between middle school students’ perceived school climate and behavioral problems. Journal of Research on Adolescence20(2): 274–286.
57.
WikströmP-OH (2009) Crime propensity, criminogenic exposure and crime involvement in early to mid adolescence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform92(2–3): 253–266.
58.
WikströmP-OHOberwittlerDTreiberK. (eds) (2012) Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
WrightBRECaspiAMoffittTE. (2001) The effects of social ties on crime vary by criminal propensity: A life-course model of interdependence. Criminology39(2): 321–352.
