This paper presents the results of a study of probation staff skills and characteristics. It first explores the skills and attributes employed by Romanian probation counsellors in the process of one-to-one supervision. It then advances a theory of how these skills and characteristics might be developed in the organizational context. The concepts of ‘habitus’ and professional socialization play an important role in this process.
AndrewsDABontaJ (1998) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
AndrewsDAKiesslingJ (1980) Program structure and effective correctional practice: A summary of CaVIC research. In RossRGendreauP (eds) Effective Correctional Treatment. Toronto: Butterworths.
3.
BauwensA (2010) The use of triangulation method in probation research. European Journal of Probation2(2): 39–52.
4.
BontaJRuggeTSedoBColesR (2004) Case Management in Manitoba Probation. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.
5.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BourgonGBontaJRuggeTGutierrezL (2010) Technology transfer: The importance of ongoing clinical supervision in translating ‘what works’ to everyday community supervision. In: McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Abingdon: Willan.
7.
BourgonGBontaJRuggeTScottTYesineA (2009) Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation47: 248–270.
8.
BrackenD (2003) Skills and knowledge for contemporary probation service. Probation Journal (50)2: 101–114.
9.
BurnettR (1992) The Dynamics of Recidivism. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
10.
CohenS (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. Cambridge: Polity.
11.
DaviesMKnopfA (1973) Social Enquiry Reports and the Probation Service. Home Office Research Study 18. London: HMSO.
12.
DeeringJ (2011) Probation Practice and the New Penology. Practitioner Reflections. Farnham: Ashgate.
13.
DittonFFordR (1994) The Reality of Probation. Aldershot: Avebury.
14.
DowdenCAndrewsD (2004) The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology48(2): 203–214.
15.
FarrallS (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan.
16.
GinsburgJIWeekesJRBoerDP (2000) Assessing treatment motivation in alcohol abusing offenders following a motivational interview. Paper presented at the 61st Annual Convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
17.
HamaiKVilleRHarrisRHoughMZvekicU (eds) (1995) Probation Around the World. London: Routledge.
18.
HarperRHardyS (2000) An evaluation of motivational interviewing as a method of intervention with clients in a probation setting. British Journal of Social Work30(3): 393–400.
19.
HeywoodJ (1964) An Introduction to Teaching Casework Skills. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
JarvisF (1972) Advise, Assist and Befriend: A History of the Probation and After-Care Service. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
21.
KingJFS (ed.) (1958) The Probation Service. London: Butterworths.
22.
KnightC (2007) The re-emergence of the importance of the “relationship” within community and criminal justice practice: Guest editorial. British Journal of Community Justice5(3): 1–4.
23.
Le MesurierL (1935) A Handbook of Probation. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
24.
McNeillF (2001) Developing effectiveness: Frontline perspectives. Social Work Education (20)6: 671–686.
25.
McNeillF (2006) A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice (6)1: 39–62.
MawbyRCWorrallA (2011) Probation workers and their occupational cultures. University of Leicester and Keele University.
28.
MillerWRRollnickS (2002) Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd edn.New York: Guilford Press.
29.
MongerM (1964) Casework in Probation. London: Butterworths.
30.
RaynorPUgwudikePVanstoneM (2010) Skills and strategies in probation supervision: The Jersey study. In McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Cullompton: Willan.
31.
RexS (1999) Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice36(4): 366–383.
32.
TrotterC (1996) The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology29(1): 29–46.
33.
TrotterC (2009) Analysis of supervision skills in youth justice. Paper presented at the CREDOS conference, Prato, 2009.
34.
TrotterCEvansP (2010) Supervision skills in juvenile justice. In: McNeillFRaynorPTrotterC (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Cullompton: Willan.
35.
TroughtT (1927) Probation in Europe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36.
UgwudikePRaynorPVanstoneM (2013) Supervision skills and practices: The Jersey study. In DurnescuIMcNeillF (eds) Understanding Penal Practice. London: Routledge.
37.
Van KalmthoutAMDurnescuI (eds) (2008) Probation in Europe. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
38.
WaltersSTMatsonSABaerJSZiedonisDM (2005) Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment29(4): 283–293.
