This study examines the effect of marriage on the conditional probability of different types of serious offending (violent, property and drug offences) over the life course for a group of high-risk males and females. Using the Trend Vector Model, results suggest that over time, marriage is linked to decreases in the likelihood of property offending in males relative to violent and drug offending, and to increases in the likelihood of property offending in females relative to the likelihoods of violent and drug offending. These findings demonstrate that the relationship between marriage and offending not only is dynamic in nature but also differs between types of offences.
BersaniBELaubJHNieuwbeertaP (2009) Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(1): 3–24.
2.
BloklandAAJNieuwbeertaP (2005) The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology43(4): 1203–1240.
ChristoffersenMNSoothillK (2003) The long-term consequences of parental alcohol abuse: A cohort study of children in Denmark. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment25(2): 107–116.
10.
CovingtonSSSurreyJL (1997) The relational model of women’s psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In: WilsnackRWWilsnackSC (eds) Gender and Alcohol: Individual and Social Perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies335–351.
11.
De RooijM (2009) Trend vector models for the analysis of change in continuous time for multiple groups. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis53(8): 3209–3216.
12.
De RooijMJYuHT (2010) The trend vector model: Identification and estimation in SAS. In: Locarek-JungeHWeihsC (eds) Classification as a Tool for Research. Heidelberg: Springer, 245–252.
13.
ElzingaCHLiefbroerAC (2007) De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population23(3): 225–250.
14.
FarringtonDPJolliffeDLoeberRStouthamer-LoeberMKalbLM (2001) The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys’ delinquency. Journal of Adolescence24(5): 579–596.
15.
FarringtonDPWestDJ (1995) Effects of marriage, separation, and children on offending by adult males. Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle4: 249–281.
16.
GiordanoPC (1978) Girls, guys and gangs: The changing social context of female delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology69(1): 126.
17.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphJL (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology107(4): 990–1064.
18.
GottfredsonMRHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Holtzworth-MunroeAStuartGL (1994) Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin116(3): 476.
20.
HorneyJOsgoodDWMarshallIH (1995) Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review60(5): 655–673.
21.
KingRDMassogliaMMacMillanR (2007) The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology45(1): 33–65.
22.
KreagerDAMatsuedaRLEroshevaEA (2010) Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology48(1): 221–258.
23.
LaubJHNaginDSSampsonRJ (1998) Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review63(2): 225–238.
24.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (1993) Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology31(3): 301–325.
25.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
26.
LinzerDALewisJB (2011) poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software42(10): 1–29.
27.
LoeberR (1990) Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review10(1): 1–41.
28.
LopooLMWesternB (2005) Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family67(3): 721–734.
29.
McGloinJMSullivanCJPiqueroAR (2009) Aggregating to versatility? Transitions among offender types in the short term. British Journal of Criminology49(2): 243–264.
30.
McGloinJMSullivanCJPiqueroARPrattTC (2007) Local life circumstances and offending specialization/versatility: Comparing opportunity and propensity models. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency44(3): 321–346.
31.
MillerJB (1976) Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
32.
MillerJ (2012) Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Published online before print April2, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0022427811432641.
33.
MoffittTE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100(4): 674–701.
34.
MoffittTEKruegerRFCaspiAFaganJ (2006) Partner abuse and general crime: How are they the same? How are they different?Criminology38(1): 199–232.
35.
NockSL (2001) The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues22(6): 755–775.
36.
OsgoodDW (2005) Making sense of crime and the life course. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science602(1): 196–211.
37.
OsgoodDWWilsonJKO’MalleyPMBachmanJGJohnstonLD (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review61: 635–655.
38.
PiqueroARFarringtonDPBlumsteinA (2007) Key Issues in Criminal Career Research: New Analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1990) Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review55(5): 609–627.
40.
SampsonRJLaubJH (2003) Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology41 (3): 555–592.
41.
SampsonRJLaubJHWimerC (2006) Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual casual effects. Criminology44(3): 465–508.
42.
SkardhamarTLyngstadTH (2009) Family formation, fatherhood and crime. An invitation to a broader perspective on crime and family transitions. Discussion Papers, 579. Statistics Norway, Research Department.
43.
SteffensmeierDAllanE (1996) Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology22: 459–487.
44.
TheobaldDFarringtonDP (2009) Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males. European Journal of Criminology6(6): 496–516.
45.
Van der PutCEDekovićMHoeveMStamsGJJMvan der LaanPHLangewoutersFEM (2010) Risk assessment of girls: Are there any sex differences in risk factors for re-offending and in risk profiles? Crime & Delinquency. First published on November11, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0011128710384776.
46.
WarrM (1996) Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology34(1): 11–37.
47.
WarrM (1998) Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology36(2): 183–216.
48.
WongTMLSlotboomAMBijleveldCCJH (2010) Risk factors for delinquency in adolescent and young adult females: A European review. European Journal of Criminology7(4): 266–284.
49.
Zoutewelle-TerovanMVVan der GeestVRLiefbroerACBijleveldCCJH (2012) Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behaviour for men and women. Crime and Delinquency. First published on August31, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0011128712441745.
