This paper argues for the value of new approaches to policing in the United States and Europe. These new approaches focus upon building police legitimacy among members of the public with the goal of encouraging widespread voluntary compliance with the law, acceptance of police authority and deference to police decisions, as well as a general willingness to cooperate with the police to fight crime.
Alpert GP, MacDonald JM and Dunham RG ( 2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology43: 407-434.
2.
Ayres I. and Borowsky J. ( 2008) A Study of Racially Disparate Outcomes in the Los Angeles Police Department. Report to the ACLU of Southern California (October).
3.
Baker A. ( 2009) New York on track for fewest homicides on record . New York Times, 29 December.
4.
Belvedere K., Worrall JL and Tibbetts SG ( 2005) Explaining suspect resistance in police-citizen encounters . Criminal Justice Review30(1): 30-44.
5.
Bennett S. and Mazerolle L. ( 2010) Testing Police Legitimacy - One Breath at a Time: The Queensland Community Engagement Trial. University of Queensland .
6.
Bouffard LA and Piquero NL (in press) Defiance theory and life course explanations of persistent offending . Crime & Delinquency.
7.
Bradford B., Jackson J. and Stanko E.(2009) Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society19: 20-46.
8.
Brooks RRW ( 2000) Fear and fairness in the city: Criminal enforcement and perceptions of fairness in minority communities. Faculty Scholarship Series, paper 1703. URL (accessed 11 May 2011): http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1703 .
9.
Cambridge Review Committee (2010) Missed Opportunities, Shared Responsibilities: Final Report of The Cambridge Review Committee. Cambridge, MA. URL (accessed 11 May 2011): http://www.cambridgema.gov/CityOfCambridge_Content/documents/Cambridge%20Review_FINAL.pdf.
10.
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, xx (1999) (plurality opinion).
11.
Collins R. ( 2007) Strolling while poor: How broken-windows policing created a new crime in Baltimore. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy14: 419-439.
12.
Davis RC, Henderson NJ and Cheryachukin Y. ( 2004) Assessing Police-Public Contacts in Seattle. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
13.
Delgado R. ( 2008) Law enforcement in subordinated communities: Innovation and response. Michigan Law Review106: 1193-1212.
14.
Elefalk K. ( 2007) Citizen’s surveys and police work: Lessons learnt in Swedish police work. Scania: Police authority.
15.
Fagan J., Geller A., Davies G. and West V. ( 2009) Street stops and broken windows revisited: the demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In: Rice SK and White MD (eds) Race, Ethnicity, and Policing. New York: New York University Press.
16.
Gau JM and Brunson RK(2009) Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: a study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly2009: 1-25.
17.
Gelman A., Fagan J. and Kiss A. ( 2005) An analysis of the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk policy in the context of claims of racial bias. URL (accessed 11 May 2011): http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/frisk7.pdf .
18.
Harcourt B. ( 2001) Illusion of Order: The False Promises of Broken Windows Policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Harcourt BE and Ludwig J. ( 2006) Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review73(1): 271-320.
20.
Herbert B. ( 2010) Watching certain people. New York Times , 2 March.
21.
Hinds L. ( 2007) Building police-youth relationships: the importance of procedural justice. Youth Justice7(3): 195-209.
22.
Hinds L.(2009) Youth, police legitimacy and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology24: 10-21.
23.
Holder E. ( 2009) Remarks prepared for delivery by Attorney General Eric Holder at the Department of Justice African American History Month Program . Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 18 February. URL (accessed 10 May 2011): http://www.justice.gov/ag/speeches/2009/ag-speech-090218.html
24.
Hough M. ( 2007) Policing, new public management and legitimacy . In: Tyler T et al. (eds) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. New York: Russell Sage.
25.
Hough M., Jackson J. and Bradford B. et al. (2010) Procedural justice, trust and institutional legitimacy. Policing4(3): 203-210.
26.
Howell KB(2009) Broken lives from broken windows: the hidden costs of aggressive order-maintenance policing. New York University Review of Law and Social Change33: 271-326.
27.
Jokinen A, Ruuskanen E and Yordanova M et al. (eds) (2009) JUSTIS: Indicators of Public Confidence in Criminal Justice for Policy Assessment . Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control.
28.
Kane RJ ( 2005) Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology43(2): 469-498.
29.
Kelling G. and Cole C. ( 1996) Fixing Broken Windows. New York : Free Press.
30.
Kubrin C., Messner SF and Deane G. et al. (2010) Proactive policing and robbery rates across U. S. cities. Criminology48: 57-97.
31.
Lind EA and Tyler TR ( 1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
32.
Long C. ( 2009) Police stop more than one million people on street . Seattle Times, 8 October.
33.
McCluskey JD ( 2003) Police Requests for Compliance: Coercive and Procedurally Just Tactics. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
34.
Mastrofski SD, Snipes JB and Supina AE ( 1996) Compliance on demand: the public’s responses to specific police requests. Journal of Crime and Delinquency33: 269-305.
35.
Murphy K., Hinds L. and Fleming J. ( 2008) Encouraging public cooperation and support for police . Policing and Society18(2): 136-155.
36.
Pew Research Center (2007) Blacks see growing values gap between poor and middle class. 13 November. URL (accessed 20 May 2011): http://pewsocialtrends.org/2007/11/13/blacks-see-growing-values-gap-between-poor-and-middle-class/ .
37.
Pew Research Center (2009) Obama’s ratings slide across the board. 30 July. URL (accessed 10 May 2011): http://people-press.org/2009/07/30/obamas-ratings-slide-across-the-board/ .
38.
Punch M. ( 2007) Zero Tolerance Policing. Bristol : Policy Press.
39.
Reisig MD and Chandek MS ( 2001) The effects of expectancy disconfirmation on outcome satisfaction in police-citizen encounters. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management24(1): 88-99.
40.
Reisig MD, Bratton J. and Gertz MG ( 2007) The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior34(8): 1005-1028.
41.
Skogan WG and Frydl K (eds) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: the Evidence . Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
42.
Skogan WG and Meares T. ( 2004) Lawful policing. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593: 66-83.
43.
Sourcebook (2011) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Albany, NY: University at Albany. URL (accessed 11 May 2011): http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/.
44.
Sunshine J. and Tyler TR ( 2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review37(3): 555-589.
45.
Taylor RB ( 2006) Incivilities reduction policing, zero tolerance, and the retreat from coproduction: Weak foundations and strong pressures. In: Weisburd D and Braga AA (eds) Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
46.
Terrill W. ( 2001) Police Coercion: Application of the Force Continuum . New York: LFB Scholarly.
47.
Tyler TR ( 2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In: Tonry M (ed.) Crime and Justice - A Review of Research. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 431-505.
48.
Tyler TR ( 2005) Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly8: 322-342.
49.
Tyler TR ( 2006a) Legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology57: 375-400.
50.
Tyler TR ( 2006b) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Tyler TR ( 2007) Psychology and the Design of Legal Institutions . Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers .
52.
Tyler TR ( 2008) Psychology and institutional design. Review of Law and Economics (symposium issue on Law and Social Norms)4(3): 801-887.
53.
Tyler TR(2009) Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation . Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law7(1): 307-359.
54.
Tyler TR and Fagan J. ( 2008) Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law6: 231-275.
55.
Tyler TR and Huo YJ ( 2002) Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage.
56.
Tyler T. and Lind EA ( 2001) Procedural justice. In: Sanders J and Hamilton VL (eds) Handbook of Justice Research in Law. New York : Plenum, 65-92.
57.
Tyler TR, Callahan P. and Frost J. ( 2007) Armed, and dangerous(?): Can self-regulatory approaches shape rule adherence among agents of social control. Law and Society Review41(2): 457-492.
58.
Weitzer R. and Tuch SA ( 2006) Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Wilson JQ and Kelling GL1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly (March): 29-38.
60.
Wunsch D. and Hohl K.(2009) Evidencing a good practice model of police communication. Policing3(4): 331-339.
