Many offenders offend near their home. But what about their former homes? Extending crime pattern theory, and combining data on police recorded robberies with data on the residential histories of the robbers and with a database of postal code areas, we demonstrate that offenders are more likely to commit commercial robberies in their former residential areas than in otherwise similar areas they have never lived in. To investigate the role of the residential history in greater detail, we assess whether duration and recency of past and current residence differentially affect the choice of target areas. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings and make recommendations for future research.
Bernasco W.(2010) A sentimental journey to crime: Effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology48, 389-416.
2.
Bernasco W and Nieuwbeerta P (2005) How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of criminal location choice. British Journal of Criminology 45, 296-315. Brantingham PJ and Brantingham PL (2008) Crime pattern theory. In: Wortley R, Mazerolle L and Rombouts S (eds) Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Cullompton, Devon: Willan, 78-93.
3.
Canter D., Coffey T., Huntley M. and Missen C. ( 2000) Predicting serial killers’ home base using a decision support system. Journal of Quantitative Criminology16, 457-78.
4.
Curman AS ( 2004) Spatial-statistical analysis of arson activity in the Greater Vancouver region of British Columbia. Unpublished Master’s thesis , Simon Fraser University, Vancouver .
5.
Dugan L. ( 1999) The effect of criminal victimization on a household’s moving decision. Criminology37, 903-30.
6.
Gärling T and Axhausen K (2003) Introduction: Habitual travel choice. Transportation 30, 1-11. Golledge RG and Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Hanson S and Huff OJ (1988) Systematic variability in repetitious travel. Transportation 15, 111-35. Horton FE and Reynolds DR (1971) Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior. Economic Geography 47, 36-48.
8.
LaVigne NG and Parthasarathy B. ( 2005) Returning Home Illinois policy brief: Prisoner reentry and residential mobility. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
9.
Mannering F., Murakami E. and Kim S.-G (1994) Temporal stability of travelers’ activity choice and home-stay duration: Some empirical evidence. Transportation21, 371-92.
Summers L., Johnson SD and Rengert GF ( 2010) The use of maps in offending interviewing. In: Bernasco W (ed.) Offenders on offending: Learning about crime from criminals. Cullompton , UK: Willan, 246-72.
12.
Tittle CR and Paternoster R. ( 1988) Geographic mobility and criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency25, 301-43.
13.
Turner S. ( 1969) Delinquency and distance. In: Sellin T and Wolfgang ME (eds) Delinquency: Selected studies. New York: John Wiley, 11-26.
14.
Van Koppen PJ and Jansen RWJ ( 1998) The road to robbery: Travel patterns in commercial robberies . British Journal of Criminology38, 230-46.
15.
Weisburd D. and Lum C. ( 2005) The diffusion of computerized crime mapping in policing : Linking research and practice Police Practice and Research6, 419-34.
16.
Wiles P. and Costello A. ( 2000) The ‘road to nowhere’: The evidence for traveling criminals. Home Office Research Study (HORS) 207. London : Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
17.
Xie M. and McDowall D. ( 2008a) The effects of residential turnover on household victimization . Criminology46, 539-75.
18.
Xie M. and McDowall D. ( 2008b) Escaping crime: The effects of direct and indirect victimization on moving. Criminology46, 809-40.
