In Governing through Crime , Jonathan Simon offers an ‘interpretation’ of contemporary practices, discourses and experiences of the state in the USA that aims to provide a ‘thick’ account of the use of crime as a governance strategy. In support of his argument, he cites a variety of constitutional, cultural, economic, historical, political and social factors. Many of them are demonstrably US-specific. Therefore, any potential for exploring the application of his ideas to another governmental entity might appear to be precluded. This article challenges that supposition, investigating their possible relevance to an understanding of the European Union’s evolving, and increasingly significant, role as a penal actor.
Ashworth AJ ( 2006). Principles of criminal law, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Baker E. ( 1998) Taking European criminal law seriously. Criminal Law Review361-80.
3.
Baker E. ( 2002) Criminal jurisdiction, the public dimension to ‘effective protection’ and the construction of Community-citizen relations. In: AA Dashwood, C Hillion, JR Spencer, A Ward (eds) Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies volume 4 2001. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
4.
Baker E.(2009) TheEuropean Union’s ‘Area of Freedom, Security and (Criminal) Justice’ ten years on. Criminal Law Review, 833-50.
5.
Baker E., Harding CS (2009) From past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the Third Pillar. European Law Review34(1): 25-54.
6.
Bantekas I., Nash S. ( 2007) International criminal law, 3rd edn. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Cavendish.
7.
Besselink LFM ( 2001) Sovereignty, criminal law and the new European context . In: P Alldridge, C Brandts (eds) Personal autonomy, the private sphere and the criminal law. Oxford: Hart Publishing .
8.
Bracke N. ( 2002) The Amsterdam Treaty framework with special reference to the incorporation of the Schengen acquis. In: PJ Cullen, S Jund (eds) Criminal justice co-operation in the European Union after Tampere. Cologne: Bundesanzeiger.
9.
Bridge JW ( 1976) The European Communities and the criminal law. Criminal Law Review, 88-97.
10.
Cavadino M., Dignan J. ( 2006) Penal systems: a comparative approach. London: Sage.
11.
Commission of the European Communities (1985 ) Completing the internal market. COM(85)310.
12.
Commission of the European Communities (1998 ) Towards an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. MEMO/98/55 . Brussels, 15 July.
13.
Commission of the European Communities (2003 ) Procedural safeguards for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union. COM(2003) 75 final.
14.
Commission of the European Communities (2005 ) The Hague Programme: ten priorities for the next five years - the partnership for renewal in the field of freedom, security and justice . COM(2005) 184.
15.
Commission of the European Communities (2007 ) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: report on implementation of the Hague Programme for 2006 . COM(2007) 373 final.
16.
Commission of the European Communities (2008 ) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: report on implementation of the Hague Programme for 2007 . COM(2008) 373 final.
17.
Commission of the European Communities (2009 ) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice serving the citizen . COM(2009) 262/4.
18.
Corstens G., Pradel J. ( 2002) European criminal law. The Hague : Kluwer.
19.
Council of Europe (2010) Complete list of the Council of Europe’s treaties. Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeTraites.asp?CM=8&CL=ENG (accessed 21 January 2010).
20.
Council of the European Union (2005) The Hague Programme: strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union, 16054/04. Brussels, 13 December 2004. OJ C53/01.
21.
Council of the European Union (2007) Proposal for a Council framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union. Paper 10287/07. Brussels, 5 June.
22.
Council of the European Union (2009) The Stockholm Programme - an open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens. Paper 17024/09. Brussels, 2 December.
23.
Council of Ministers (1998) Action plan of the Council and the Commission on how best to implement the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam establishing an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, 13844/98. Brussels, 4 December.
24.
Craig P., de Búrca G. ( 2008) EU law: text, cases and materials, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Den Boer M. ( 1997) Justice and home affairs cooperation in the Treaty on European Union: more complexity despite communautarization. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law4: 310-16.
26.
Den Boer M., Wallace W. ( 2000) Justice and Home Affairs: integration through incrementalism? In: H Wallace, W Wallace (eds) Policy-making in the European Union, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Denza E. ( 2002) The intergovernmental pillars of the European Union . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
28.
Dorn N. ( 1996) Borderline criminology: external drug policies of the EU. In: N Dorn, J Jepsen, E Savona (eds) European drug policies and enforcement. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
29.
Douglas-Scott S. ( 2004) The rule of law in the European Union - putting security into the ‘area of freedom, security and justice’. European Law Review29(2): 219-42.
30.
Douglas-Scott S. ( 2006) A tale of two courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European human rights acquis. Common Market Law Review43: 629-65.
31.
European Commission (2004a) Justice and Home Affairs. Flash Eurobarometer155.
32.
European Commission (2004b) Proposal for a Council framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union. COM( 2004) 328 final.
33.
European Commission (2006) The role of the European Union in fighting against organised crime. Special Eurobarometer264.
34.
European Commission (2007) The role of the European Union in justice, freedom and security policy areas. Special Eurobarometer266.
35.
European Commission (2008a) Standard Eurobarometer 70.
36.
European Commission (2008b) The role of the European Union in justice, freedom and security policy areas . Special Eurobarometer290.
37.
European Commission DG Justice, Freedom and Security ( 2008) JAI-Acquis of the EuropeanUnion: Title IV of the TEC, Part II of the TEC, Title VI of the TEU. http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_centre/intro/doc_intro_en.htm .
38.
European Council (1999) Conclusions of the Special European Council on the Creation of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice held at Tampere. 15 and 16 October. Bulletin10-1999.
39.
European Council (2001) Conclusions and Plan of Action of the Extraordinary European Council Meeting on 21 September 2001. SN 140/01.
40.
Fletcher M., Lööf R., Gilmore W. ( 2008) EU criminal law and justice. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
41.
Franko Aas K. ( 2005) Sentencing in the age of information: from Faust to Macintosh . London: Glasshouse Press.
42.
Genson R. ( 1998) The Schengen agreements - police cooperation and security aspects. In: PJ Cullen, W Gilmore (eds) Crime sans frontières: international and European legal approaches. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
43.
Häge FM ( 2008) Who decides in the Council of the European Union?Journal of Common Market Studies46(3): 533-58.
44.
Harris D., O’Boyle M., Warbrick C., Bates E., Buckley C. ( 2009) Law of the European Convention on Human Rights , 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Hartley TC ( 2007) The foundations of European Community law, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
House of Lords European Union Committee (2008 a) The Treaty of Lisbon: an impact assessment. 10th Report of Session 2007-2008. HL Paper 62. London: Stationery Office.
47.
House of Lords European Union Committee (2008 b) Initiation of legislation: report with evidence. 22nd Report of Session 2007-2008. HL Paper 150. London: Stationery Office.
48.
Kittichaisaree K. ( 2001) International criminal law. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
49.
Lacey N. ( 2007) Legal constructions of crime. In: M Maguire, R Morgan, R Reiner (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology , 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
Lappi-Seppälä T. ( 2008) Trust, welfare and political culture: explaining the differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research37: 313-88.
51.
Lavenex S., Wallace W. ( 2005) Justice and home affairs: towards a European public order . In: H Wallace, W Wallace, MA Pollock (eds) Policy-making in the European Union, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Lodge J. ( 1993) Internal security and judicial cooperation. In: J Lodge (ed.) The European Community and the challenge of the future, 2nd edn. London: Pinter.
53.
Mitsilegas V. ( 2009) EU criminal law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
54.
Monar J. ( 1998) Justice and home affairs in the Treaty of Amsterdam: reform at the price of fragmentation. European Law Review23(4): 320-35.
55.
Monar J. ( 2002) Decision-making in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice . In: AM Arnull, D Wincott (eds) Accountability and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
O’Keefe D. ( 1991) The Schengen Convention: a suitable model for European integration?Yearbook of European Law11: 185-219.
57.
Ovey C., White R. ( 2006) The European Convention on Human Rights, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
Peers S. ( 2004) Mutual recognition and criminal law in the European Union: has the Council got it wrong? Common Market Law Review41(1): 5-36.
59.
Peers S. ( 2006) EU justice and home affairs law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
Peers S. ( 2008) EU criminal law and the Treaty of Lisbon. European Law Review33(4): 507-29.
61.
Schutte JJE ( 1998) The incorporation of the Schengen aquis in the European Union. In: PJ Cullen, W Gilmore (eds) Crime sans frontières: international and European legal approaches. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
62.
Sharpston E., Fernández-Martín JM (2008) Some reflections on Schengen free movement rights and the principle of ne bis in idem. In: C Barnard (ed.) Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies volume 10 2007-2008. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
63.
Shaw MN ( 2008) International law, 6th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
64.
Simon J. ( 2007) Governing through crime: how the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York : Oxford University Press.
65.
Swedish Presidency (2009) Declaration by the Presidency on behalf of the EU the 1000th execution by lethal injection in the United States of America. 21 July. Available at: http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/7/21/declaration_by_the_presidency_on_behalf_of_the_eu_the_1000th_execution_by_lethal_injection_in_the_united_states_of_america (accessed 21 January 2010).
66.
Tallberg J. ( 2008) Bargaining power in theEuropean Council. Journal of Common Market Studies46(3): 685-708.
67.
Thomson R. ( 2008) The Council Presidency in the European Union: responsibility with power. Journal of Common Market Studies46(3): 593-617.
68.
Thomson R., Hosli M. ( 2006) Who has power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in legislative decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies44(2): 391-417.
69.
Warntjen A. ( 2007) Steering the Union: the impact of the EU Presidency on legislative activity in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies45(5): 1135-57.
70.
Woltjer A. ( 1995) Schengen: the way of no return?Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law2: 256-78.
