Previous research has not yet integrated determinants of youth delinquency at the city, neighbourhood and individual levels simultaneously. In this study we derived hypotheses from social disorganization theory at the city level as well as at the neighbourhood level. We use individual-level data from 11 cities in the Netherlands, supplemented with information about the structural characteristics of these cities and their neighbourhoods. Our results show that concentrated contextual disadvantage at both city and neighbourhood levels affects juvenile delinquency. More detailed analyses demonstrate that it is particularly the percentage of one-parent families that has a significant effect on youth delinquency. The implications for the study of the influence of ecological contexts on youth delinquency are discussed.
Anderson, A.L. (2002). Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: The role of the single-parent family. Journal of Criminal Justice30, 575-87.
2.
Balkwell, J.W. (1990). Ethnic equality and the rate of homicide. Social Forces69, 53-70.
3.
Beyers, J.M., Loeber, R., Wikström, P.O. and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2001). What predicts adolescent violence in better-off neighborhoods? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology29, 369-81.
4.
Bijmold, A., De Jong, G., Hofstede, A., Scheltinga, P. and Veenkamp, A. (1998). Standaard jeugdmonitor G21. Grote-Stedenbeleid: Jeugd en veiligheid. Enschede/Groningen : I&O Research/Bureau Onderzoek SoZaWe.
5.
Blau, J.R. and Blau, P.M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review47, 114-29.
6.
Blom, M., Oudhof, J., Bijl, R.V. and Bakker, B.F.M. (2005). Verdacht van criminaliteit: Allochtonen en autochtonen nader bekeken. The Hague: WODC.
7.
Cantillon, D., Davidson, W.S. and Schweitzer, J.H. (2003). Measuring community social organization: Sense of community as a mediator in social disorganization theory . Journal of Criminal Justice31, 321-39.
8.
Farrington, D.P. (1995). The Twelfth Jack Tizard Memorial Lecture: The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines36, 929-64.
9.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. New York: Wiley.
10.
Hansen, K. (2003). Education and the crime-age profile. British Journal of Criminology43, 141-68.
11.
Junger, M. and Haen Marshall, I. (1997). The interethnic generalizability of social control theory: An empirical test. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency34, 79-112.
12.
Liska, A.E., Logan, J.R. and Bellair, P.E. (1998). Race and violent crime in the suburbs. American Sociological Review63, 27-38.
13.
Logan, J.R. and Messner, S.F. (1987). Racial residential segregation and suburban violent crime. Social Science Quarterly68, 510-27.
14.
Miethe, T.D., Hughes, M. and McDowall, M. (1991). Social change and crime rates: An evaluation of alternative theoretical approaches. Social Forces70, 165-85.
15.
Moffit, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100, 674-701.
16.
Parker, K.F. (2001). A move toward specificity: Examining urban disadvantage and race- and relationship-specific homicide rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology17, 89-110.
17.
Peeples, F. and Loeber, R. (1994). Do individual factors and neighborhood context explain ethnic differences in juvenile delinquency? Journal of Quantitative Criminology10, 141-57.
18.
Piquero, N.L., Gover, A.R., MacDonald, J.M. and Piquero, A.R. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter? Youth & Society36, 251-75.
19.
Pratt, T.C. (2001). Assessing the relative effects of macro-level predictors of crime: A meta-analysis. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
20.
Sampson, R.J. (1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. In A. J. Reiss, Jr, and M. Tonry (eds) Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 8). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
21.
Sampson, R.J. and Groves, W.B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94, 774-802.
22.
Sampson, R.J. and Laub, J.H. (1994). Urban poverty and the family context of delinquency: A new look at structure and process in a classic study. Child Development65, 523-40.
23.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W. and Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277, 918-24.
24.
Schneiders, J., Drukker, M., Van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F.C., Van Os, J. and Nicolson, N.A. (2003). Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioural problems from late childhood into early adolescence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health57, 699-703.
25.
Shaw, C. and McKay, H. ([1942]1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Shihadeh, E.S. and Flynn, N. (1996). Segregation and crime: The effect of black social isolation on the rates of black urban violence. Social Forces74, 1325-52.
27.
Shihadeh, E.S. and Steffensmeier, D.J. (1994). Economic inequality, family disruption, and urban black violence: Cities as units of stratification and social control. Social Forces73, 729-51.
28.
Snijders, T.A.B. and Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage Publications.
29.
Van Wilsem, J. (2003). Crime and context. The impact of individual, neighbourhood, city and country characteristics on victimization. ICS dissertation, Nijmegen.
30.
Velez, M.B., Krivo, L.J. and Peterson, R.D. (2003). Structural inequality and homicide: An assessment of the black-white gap in killings. Criminology41, 645-72.
31.
Weijters, G., Scheepers, P. and Gerris, J. (2007). Distinguishing the city, neighbourhood, and individual level in the explanation of youth delinquency: A multilevel approach. European Journal of Criminology4, 87-108.
32.
Wittebrood, K. (2000). Buurten en geweldscriminaliteit: Een multilevel-analyse . Mens & Maatschappij75, 92-109.
