Classic strain theorists, such as Cohen (1955) and Cloward and Ohlin (1960), placed the emphasis on the relationship between strain and neutralization techniques. They argued that strains foster the adoption of beliefs favourable to crime. According to General Strain Theory(GST), stressful events are most likely to result in crime when a form of criminal reasoning already exists in the individual's mind. But few researchers have tested this idea. This study is one of the first to apply GST to a sample of 500 Italian subjects, in an attempt to merge two important theories: Agnew's theory and the neutralization theory. We aimed to test whether or not there is a combined effect between strain and some techniques of neutralization, especially with respect to two different criminal behaviours: major and minor crimes. The results provide partial support for the core idea of GST, namely of there being a relationship between strain, anger and crime.
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology30, 47-87.
2.
Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence . Criminology32, 555-580.
3.
Agnew, R. (2001a). Building on the foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency38, 319-61.
4.
Agnew, R. (2001b). An overview of general strain theory. In R. Paternoster and R. Bachman (eds) Explaining criminals and crime. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
5.
Agnew, R. (2003). A general strain theory of crime and delinquency . In F. Cullen and R. Agnew (eds) Criminological theory. Past to present. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
6.
Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J.P. and Cullen, F.C. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology40, 43-72.
7.
Buzzell, T. (2005). Holiday revelry and legal control of fireworks: A study of neutralization in two normative contexts. Western Criminology Review6, 30-42.
8.
Cameron, M.O. (1964). The booster and the snitch: Department store shoplifting . New York: Free Press.
9.
Caspi, A., Moffit, T.E., Silva, P.A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R.F. and Schmutte, P.S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods . Criminology32, 163-95.
10.
Clinard, M., Quinney, R. and Wildeman, J. (1994). Criminal behavior systems: A typology. OhioAnderson Publishing Company.
11.
Cloward, R.A. and Ohlin, E.L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York: Free Press.
12.
Cohen, A.K. (1955). Delinquent boys. The culture of gangs. New York: Free Press.
13.
Cromwell, P. and Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralization by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior24, 535-50.
14.
Dodder, R. and Hughes, S. (1993). Neutralization of drinking behavior. Deviant Behavior14, 65-79.
15.
Froggio, G. (2007). Strain and juvenile delinquency: A critical review of Agnew's General Strain Theory. Journal of Loss and Trauma. International Perspectives on Stress & Coping12, 383-418.
16.
Froggio, G. and Agnew, R. (2007). The relationship between crime and `objective' versus `subjective' strains. Journal of Criminal Justice35, 81-7.
17.
Gottfredson, M.R. and Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J. Jr, Bursik, R.Y., Jr and Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30, 5-29.
19.
Hindelang, M.J. (1970). The commitment of delinquents to their misdeeds: Do delinquents drift? Social Problems35, 159-61.
20.
Hollinger, R. (1991). Neutralizing in the workplace: An empirical analysis of property theft and production deviance. Deviant Behavior12, 169-202.
21.
Hosmer, D.W., Jr and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
22.
Konty, M. (2005). Microanomie: The cognitive foundations of the relationship between anomie and deviance. Criminology43, 107-32.
23.
Labos (1994). La gioventù negata. Osservatorio sul disagio giovanile. Roma: Edizioni TER.
24.
Landsheer, J. and Hart, A. (2000). Punishments adolescents find justified: An examination of attitudes toward delinquency. Adolescence35, 683-94.
25.
McCarthy, J.G. and Stewart, A.L. (1998). Neutralization as a process of graduated desensitization: Moral values of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology42, 278-90.
26.
Maruna, S. and Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice22, 221-320.
27.
Merton, R.K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3, 672-82.
28.
Minor, W.W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency18, 295-318.
29.
Mitchell, J., Dodder, R.A. and Norris, T.D. (1990). Neutralization and delinquency: A comparison by sex and ethnicity. Adolescence25, 487-97.
30.
Polding, B.E. (1995). The extension of neutralization theory to the academic dishonesty of college student. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
31.
Sheley, J. (1980). Is neutralization necessary for criminal behavior ? Deviant Behavior2, 611-22.
32.
Storch, J.B., Storch, E.A. and Clark, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty and neutralization theory: A comparison of intercollegiate athletes and non-athletes. Journal of College Student Development43, 921-30.
33.
Sykes, G.M. and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency . American Sociological Review22, 664-70.
34.
Taylor, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Walters, G.D. (2002). Criminal belief systems: An integrated-interactive theory of lifestyles. New York: Praeger Publishers.
36.
Wright, B.R., Caspi, A., Moffit, T.E. and Silva, P.A. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both?Criminology39, 321-52.
