As a means of improving our understanding of the significance of the residential neighbourhood, we have examined exposure to property crime, studying the extent to which differences in the risk of exposure to crime are related on the one hand to individual and household characteristics and on the other to neighbourhood conditions and differences in where people live. The data are drawn from interview surveys of living conditions, which also include a number of questions relating to criminal victimization. These survey data have been combined with register data relating to residential neighbourhoods. The focus is directed at different districts in urban areas, grouped on the basis of accumulated resource deficiencies.
Blakely, T.A. and Woodward, A.J. (2000). Ecological effects in multi-level studies. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health54, 367-74.
2.
Bråmå,Å. (2006). Studies in the dynamics of residential segregation . Uppsala: Department of Social and Economic Geography.
3.
Buck N. ( 2001). Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion . Urban Studies38, 2251-7.
4.
Cohen, L. and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends. American Sociological Review44, 588-608.
5.
Dolmén, L. (2002). Brottslighetens geografi. Department of Criminology , Stockholm University.
6.
Estrada, F. and Nilsson, A. (2004). Exposure to threatening and violent behaviour among single mothers - the significance of lifestyle, neighbourhood and welfare situation. British Journal of Criminology44, 168-87.
7.
Estrada, F. and Nilsson, A. (2006). Segregation och utsatthet för egendomsbrott. Working Paper2006:5, Institute for Futures Studies.
8.
Gottschalk, P. and Smeeding, T.M. (2000). Empirical evidence on income inequality in industrialized countries. In A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds) Handbook of income distribution . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
9.
Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M. and Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge: Ballinger.
10.
Hope, T. (1996). Communities, crime and inequality in England and Wales. In T. Bennett (ed.) Preventing crime and disorder. Cambridge: Cambridge Cropwood Series.
11.
Hope, T. (2001). Crime victimisation and inequality in risk society . In R. Matthews and J. Pitts (eds) Crime, disorder and community safety. London: Routledge.
12.
Hope, T. and Hough, M. (1988). Area, crime and incivility: A profile from the British Crime Survey. In T. Hope and M. Shaw (eds) Communities and crime reduction. London: Home Office.
13.
Leyland, A.H. and Groenewegen, P.P. (2003). Multilevel modelling and public health policy. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health31, 267-74.
14.
Lupton, R. (2003). Neighbourhood effects: Can we measure them and does it matter? CASEpaper 73. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.
15.
Nilsson, A. and Estrada, F. (2003). Victimisation, inequality and welfare during an economic recession. A study of self reported victimisation in Sweden 1988-1999 . British Journal of Criminology43, 655-72.
16.
Nilsson, A. and Estrada, F. (2006). The inequality of victimization: Trends in exposure to crime among rich and poor. European Journal of Criminology3, 387-412.
17.
Nilsson, A. and Estrada, F. (2007). Risky neighbourhood or individuals at risk? The significance of neighbourhood conditions for violent victimisation in residential areas. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention8.
18.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
Sampson, R.J. and Groves, W.B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94, 774-802.
20.
Sampson, R.J. and Raudenbush, S. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighbourhood stigma and the social constructions of broken windows. Social Psychology Quarterly67, 319-42.
21.
Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D. and Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Reviews Sociology28, 443-78.
22.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S. and Earls, F. (1997). Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-24.
23.
Shaw, C.R. and McKay, H.D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Trickett, A., Ellingworth, D., Hope, T. and Pease, K. (1995). Crime victimization in the eighties. British Journal of Criminology35, 343-59.
25.
Trickett, A., Osborn, D., Seymour, J. and Pease, K. (1992). What is different about high crime areas? British Journal of Criminology32, 81-9.
26.
Triplett, R., Gainey, R. and Sun, I. (2003). Institutional strength, social control, and neighbourhood crime rates. Theoretical Criminology7, 439-67.
27.
Tseloni, A. (2006). Multilevel modelling of the number of property crimes: Household and area effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A-statistics in Society169, 205-33.
28.
Wikström, P.O. (1991). Sociala problem brott och trygghet. Brå-rapport1991:5. Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet.
29.
Wikström, P.O. (1998). Communities and crime. In M. Tonry (ed.) The Handbook of Crime and Punishment, 269-301 . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
30.
Wikström, P.O. and Dolmén, L. (2001). Urbanisation, neighbourhood social integration, informal social control, minor social disorder, victimisation and fear of crime. International Review of Victimology8, 121-40.
31.
Wikström, P.O. and Loeber, R. (2000). Do disadvantaged neighbourhoods cause well-adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? Criminology38, 1109-42.
32.
Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
