The extent and nature of contextual effects on juvenile offending are frequent subjects of current research, mainly in the USA. After a short literature review, this paper presents empirical results of a new study which hints at the existence of neighbourhood contextual effects on serious offending by adolescents. The study is based on three types of cross-sectional data on 61 neighbourhoods in two German cities and a rural area: a self-report survey of students aged about 13 to 16, a separate survey of residents in the survey neighbourhoods, and census and administrative data on the same neighbourhoods. Multilevel analysis is applied to identify and explain the neighbourhood-level variance of selfreported serious juvenile offending. Hypotheses from both main traditions of theoretical reasoning about contextual effects on juvenile delinquency - subcultural and disorganization theories - are supported by the empirical findings. The spatial concentration of adolescents with attitudes typical of delinquent subcultures increases the likelihood of serious offending net of relevant individual predictors, whereas the social capital of neighbourhoods (as measured by the independent survey of residents) reduces it. Methodological problems of applying multilevel analysis to delinquency research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, A. L. (2002). Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: The role of the single-parent family . Journal of Criminal Justice30, 575-587 .
2.
Bellair, P. E. (2000). Informal surveillance and street crime: A complex relationship . Criminology38, 137-169 .
3.
Bottoms, A. E. and Wiles, P. (1997). Environmental criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
4.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
5.
Browne, W. J., Goldstein, H. and Rasbash, J. (2001). Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models . Statistical Modelling1, 103-124 .
6.
Browne, W. J., Subramanian, S. V., Jones, K. and Goldstein, H. (2002). Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit over-dispersion. Unpublished paper, available at http://www.maths.nott.ac.uk/personal/pmzwjb/materials/billcorr1.pdf, accessed 8 September 2003.
7.
Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
8.
Bursik, R. J., Jr (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects . Criminology26, 519-552 .
9.
Bursik, R. J., Jr (2001). The unfolding of criminal events within neighborhood contexts. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy and V. F. Sacco (eds) The process and structure of crime. Criminal events and crime analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers .
10.
Cheong, Y. F. and Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). Measurement and structural models for children’s problem behaviors . Psychological Methods5, 477-495 .
11.
Cloward, R. A. and Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. Illinois: Free Press of Glencoe .
12.
Cohen, L. E. and Land, K. (1984). Discrepancies between crime reports and crime surveys: Urban and structural determinants . Criminology22, 499-530 .
13.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology94, 95-120 .
14.
Dahlbäck, O. (1996). Urban place of residence and individual criminality . British Journal of Criminology36, 529-545 .
15.
Duncan, G. J. and Brooks-Gunn, J., eds (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
16.
Duncan, G. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effect of context in studies of child and youth development . Educational Psychologist34, 29-41 .
17.
Eisner, M. (1997). Das Ende der zivilisierten Stadt? Die Auswirkungen von Modernisierung und urbaner Krise auf Gewaltdelinquenz. Frankfurt: Campus.
18.
Eisner, M. and Wikström, P.-O. (1999). Violent crime in the urban community: A comparison of Stockholm and Basel . European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research7, 427-442 .
19.
Elliott, D. S. and Huizinga, D. (1989). Improving self-reported measures of delinquency. In M. W. Klein (ed.) Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency, (NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences, vol. 50), 155-186. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers .
20.
Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A. and Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency33, 389-426 .
21.
Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K. and Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence . Child Development74, 205-220 .
22.
Felson, R. B., Liska, A. E., South, S. J. and McNulty, T. L. (1994). The subculture of violence and delinquency: Individual vs. school context effects . Social Forces73, 155-173 .
23.
Furstenberg, F. and Hughes, M. E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth . Journal of Marriage and the Family57.
24.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties . American Journal of Sociology78, 1360-1380 .
25.
Guo, G. and Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data . Annual Review of Sociology26: 441-462 .
26.
Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology106, 1013-1057 .
27.
Howe, C.-W., Karstedt-Henke, S. and Wolterhoff, J. (1991). Wie dunkel ist das Dunkelfeld? Die Validität selbstberichteter Delinquenzangaben bei Jugendlichen. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Bielefeld.
28.
Junger-Tas, J. and Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and justice. A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
29.
Karstedt-Henke, S. and Crasm öller, B. (1991). Risks of being detected, chances of getting away. In J. Junger-Tas, L. Boendermaker and P. van der Laan (eds) The future of the juvenile justice system. Leuwen: Acco .
30.
Kim, Y. S. (2001). The effects of individual, neighborhood, and school characteristics on delinquency: A multi-level cross-nested analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
31.
Klein, M. W. (1984). Offence specialisation and versatility among juveniles . British Journal of Criminology24, 185-194 .
32.
Köllisch, T. and Oberwittler, D. (submitted). Wie ehrlich berichten Jugendlicheüber ihr delinquentes Verhalten? Ergebnisse einer externen Validierung auf individueller und Aggregatebene. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
33.
Leventhal, T. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes . Psychological Bulletin126, 309-337 .
34.
Liska, E. and Warner, B. (1991). Functions of crime: A paradoxical process . American Journal of Sociology91, 1441-1463 .
35.
Loeber, R. and Stouthammer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds) Crime and justice, vol. 7. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
36.
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J. and Hirschfield, P. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime. Evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment . Quarterly Journal of Economics116, 655-680 .
37.
Matsueda, R. L. and Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior . Criminology36, 269-308 .
38.
Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence . Criminology39, 517-559 .
39.
Oberwittler, D. (2002). Ecological context effects on juvenile offending - Conditional impacts of neighborhoods and schools. Working Paper No. 6 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute .
40.
Oberwittler, D. (2003a). Das stadtviertel-und gemeindebezogene Stichprobendesign. Anlage und empirische Ergebnisse. Working Paper No. 9 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute .
41.
Oberwittler, D. (2003b). Die Messung und Qualitätskontrolle kontextbezogener Befragungsdaten mithilfe der Mehrebenenanalyse - am Beispiel des Sozialkapitals von Stadtvierteln . ZA-Information53, 11-41 .
42.
Oberwittler, D. (in preparation). Which context? An integrated multilevel analysis of neighborhoods and schools as ecological contexts of juvenile delinquency.
43.
Oberwittler, D. and Blank, T. (2003). Methodenbericht MPI-Schulbefragung 1999. Technical Report No. 1 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute .
44.
Oberwittler, D. and Naplava, T. (2002a). Auswirkungen des Erhebungsverfahrens bei Jugendbefragungen zu ‘heiklen’ Themen - schulbasierte schriftliche Befragung und haushaltsbasierte mündliche Befragung im Vergleich. ZUMANachrichten 51, 49-77.
45.
Oberwittler, D. and Naplava, T. (2002b). Methodenbericht postalische Bewohnerbefragung. Technical Report No. 3 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute .
46.
Oberwittler, D., Köllisch, T. and Würger, M. (2002). Selbstberichtete Delinquenz bei Jugendlichen. In A. Glöckner-Rist (ed.) ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente Version 6.0. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen .
47.
Osgood, D. W. and Anderson, A. L. (2000). Routine activities and social disorganization: Explaining schools’ rates of delinquency . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society of Criminology.
48.
Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G. and Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual delinquent behavior . American Sociological Review61, 635-655 .
49.
Ouimet, M. (2000). Aggregation bias in ecological research: How social disorganization and criminal opportunities shape the spatial distribution of juvenile delinquency in Montreal . Canadian Journal of Criminology42, 135-156 .
50.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology . Annual Review of Sociology24, 1-24 .
51.
Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
52.
Raudenbush, S. W. and Sampson, R. J. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with appliance to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods . Sociological Methodology29, 1-41 .
53.
Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A. and Congdon, R. (2001). HLM. Hierarchical-linear and non-linear modeling. Program Version 5.
54.
Rood-Pijpers, E., Rovers, B., van Gemert, F. and Fijnaut, C. (1995). Preventje van jeugdcriminaliteit in een grote stad. Rotterdam: Sanders Instituut .
55.
Sampson, R. J. (2000). How do communities undergird or undermine human development? Relevant contexts and social mechanisms. In A. Booth and N. Crouter (eds) Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and families. Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
56.
Sampson, R. J. and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime. Testing social-disorganization theory . American Journal of Sociology94, 774-831 .
57.
Sampson, R. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods . American Journal of Sociology105, 603-651 .
58.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. and Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children . American Sociological Review64: 633-660 .
59.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. and Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research . Annual Review of Sociology28, 443-478 .
60.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W. and Earls, F. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy . Science277, 918-924 .
61.
Shaw, C. and McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
62.
Simcha-Fagan, O. and Schwartz, J. E. (1986). Neighborhood and delinquency: An assessment of contextual effects . Criminology24, 667-704 .
63.
Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline. Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press .
64.
Smith, D. J., McVie, S., Woodward, R., Shute, J., Flint, J. and McAra, L. (2001). The Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime: Key findings at ages 12 and 13. Edinburgh: Centre of Law and Society .
65.
Snijders, T. and Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel analysis. London: Sage .
66.
Thornberry, T. P. (1996). Empirical support for interactional theory: A review of the literature. In J. D. Hawkins (ed.) Delinquency and crime. Current theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
67.
Timberlake, J. M. (2002). Racial and ethnic inequality in childhood exposure to neighborhood poverty and affluence . Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Chicago: University of Chicago.
68.
Wegener, B. (1988). Kritik des Prestiges. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag .
69.
Welsh, W., Greene, J. and Jenkins, P. (1999). School disorder: The influence of individual, institutional, and community factors . Criminology37, 73-115 .
70.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (1991). Urban crime, criminals, and victims. New York: Springer .
71.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (1998). Communities and crime. In M. Tonry (ed.) Oxford handbook on crime and punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
72.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2002). Adolescent crime in context. Report to the Home Office. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology .
73.
Wikström, P.-O. H. and Sampson, R. J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt and A. Caspi (eds) The causes of conduct disorder and serious juvenile delinquency. New York: Guilford Press .
74.
Wilson, William J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press .
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
