In this work, it is investigated how reading comfort is influenced by monitor and ambient luminance levels, when employing high-luminance monitors. High-luminance monitors can be used to get more light on the eye and elicit non-image-forming effects. However, this might lead to reduced reading comfort. Two psychophysical methods, a continuous rating scale and paired comparison, were employed to investigate reading comfort in relation to the luminance of the monitor and the ambient environment. The results of 18 observers for the continuous rating scale experiment (aged 20 y to 30 y) and 20 observers for the paired comparison experiment (aged 20 y to 37 y) indicate that reading comfort is significantly influenced by both monitor and ambient luminance levels The paired comparison methodology provided more distinctive capabilities and thus offered a deeper insight. In contrast to prior work suggesting a linear relation between monitor luminance and preferred ambient luminance, the current results indicate that the reading comfort level reaches a tipping or saturation point. A monitor luminance level of 260 cd m−2 combined with an ambient luminance level of 68 cd m−2 provided the highest reading comfort. This reading comfort could not be matched when employing a higher monitor luminance level of 700 cd m−2.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoyceP.Light, lighting and human health. Lighting Research and Technology2022; 54: 101–144.
2.
HouserKBoycePZeitzerJHerfM.Human-centric lighting: myth, magic or metaphor?Lighting Research and Technology2021; 53: 97–118.
3.
BersonDMDunnFATakaoM.Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)2002; 295: 1070–1073.
4.
ProvencioIRodriguezIRJiangGHayesWPMoreiraEFRollagMD.A novel human opsin in the inner retina. The Journal of Neuroscience2000; 20: 600–605.
5.
BrownTMBrainardGCCajochenCCzeislerCAHanifinJPLockleySW, et al. Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults. PLoS Biology2022; 20: 1–24.
6.
van DuijnhovenJAartsMPJvan den HeuvelERKortHSM.The identification of variables influencing personal lighting conditions of office workers. Lighting Research and Technology2021; 53: 527–541.
7.
KlepeisNENelsonWCOttWRRobinsonJPTsangAMSwitzerP, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology2001; 11: 231–252.
8.
van DuijnhovenJAartsMKortH. Personal lighting conditions of office workers: an exploratory field study. Lighting Research and Technology2021; 53: 285–310.
9.
SmoldersKCHJde KortYAWCluitmansPJM.A higher illuminance induces alertness even during office hours: findings on subjective measures, task performance and heart rate measures. Physiology and Behavior2012; 107: 7–16.
10.
HuWDavisW.Toward a connected system – understanding the contribution of light from different sources on occupants’ circadian rhythms. Applied Sciences2021; 11: 9939.
11.
BenedettoSCarboneADrai-ZerbibVPedrottiMBaccinoT.Effects of luminance and illuminance on visual fatigue and arousal during digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior2014; 41: 112–119.
12.
de BakkerCAartsMKortHvan LoenenERosemannA. Preferred luminance distributions in open-plan offices in relation to time-of-day and subjective alertness. Leukos2021; 17: 3–20.
13.
SchlangenLJMPriceLLA.The lighting environment, its metrology, and non-visual responses. Frontiers in Neurology2021; 12: 624861.
14.
St HilaireMAGooleyJJKhalsaSBSKronauerRECzeislerCALockleySW.Human phase response curve to a 1 h pulse of bright white light. The Journal of Physiology2012; 590: 3035–3045.
15.
FigueiroMGNagareRPriceLLA. Non-visual effects of light: how to use light to promote circadian entrainment and elicit alertness. Lighting Research and Technology2018; 50: 38–62.
16.
SoumanJLTingaAMte PasSFvan EeRVlaskampBNS. Acute alerting effects of light: a systematic literature review. Behavioural Brain Research2018; 337: 228–239.
17.
VinkPHallbeckS.Editorial: Comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Applied Ergonomics2012; 43: 271–276.
18.
MansfieldNNaddeoAFrohriepSVinkP.Integrating and applying models of comfort. Applied Ergonomics2020; 82: 102917.
19.
KimMJeonD-HKimJ-SYuB-CParkYLeeS-W.Optimum display luminance depends on white luminance under various ambient illuminance conditions. Optical Engineering2018; 57: 024106.
20.
ShenYKuaiSGZhouWXPengSTianMLiuKJ, et al. Study of preferred background luminance in watching computer screen in children. Chinese Medical Journal2014; 127: 2073–2077.
21.
ZhouYShiHChenQ-WRuTZhouG.Investigation of the optimum display luminance of an LCD screen under different ambient illuminances in the evening. Applied Sciences2021; 11: 4108.
22.
European Committee for Standardization. Light and Lighting – Lighting of Work Places – Part 1: Indoor Work Places. EN 12464-1:2021. Brussels: CEN, 2021.
23.
HuangHPOuLCYuanY.Effects of age and ambient illuminance on visual comfort for reading on a mobile device. Color Research and Application2017; 42: 352–361.
24.
HuangHPWeiMLiHCOuLC.Visual comfort of tablet devices under a wide range of ambient light levels. Applied Sciences2021; 11: 8679.
25.
LiuYZhuYLuoMR.A model to predict visual comfort for mobile displays. Color Research and Application2022; 47: 1229–1241.
26.
MadsenM.OsterhausW.Exploring simple assessment methods for lighting quality with architecture and design students. Fabricating Sustainability: 39th Annual Architectural Science Association Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006.
27.
SheedyJESmithRHayesJ.Visual effects of the luminance surrounding a computer display. Ergonomics2005; 48: 1114–1128.
28.
HanLZhangHXiangZShangJAnjaniSSongY, et al. Desktop lighting for comfortable use of a computer screen. Work2021; 68: S209–S221.
29.
FotiosSChealC.Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 433–447.
30.
HouserKWTillerDK.Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Research and Technology2003; 35: 183–195.
31.
StevensSS.On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review1957; 64: 153–181.
32.
MarsdenAM.Brightness-luminance relationships in an interior. Lighting Research and Technology1970; 2: 10–16.
33.
Van de PerreLSmetKHanselaerPDujardinMRyckaertW.The effect of correlated colour temperature and wall luminance on spatial brightness and scene preference in a windowless office setup. Lighting Research and Technology2024; 56: 316–336.
34.
European Committee for Standardization. Light and lighting – Lighting of work places – Part 1: Indoor work places. EN 12464-1:2011. Brussels: CEN, 2011.
35.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. What to Document and Report in Studies of ipRGC-Influenced Responses to Light. CIE TN 011:2020. Vienna: CIE, 2020.
36.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. CIE System for Metrology of Optical Radiation for ipRGC-Influenced Responses to Light. CIE S 026/E:2018. Vienna: CIE, 2018.
37.
FairchildMDReniffL.Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1995; 12: 824–833.
38.
FotiosS.Chromatic adaptation and the relationship between lamp spectrum and brightness. Lighting Research and Technology2006; 38: 3–14.
KleinerMBrainardDPelliDInglingAMurrayRBroussardC.What’s new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception2007; 36: 1–16.
41.
PelliDG.The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision1997; 10: 437–442.
42.
KooTKLiMY.A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine2016; 15: 155–163.
43.
McGrawKOWongSP.Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods1996; 1: 30–46.
FieldAPMilesJFieldZ.Discovering statistics using R. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012.
46.
KingdomFAAPrinsN.Psychophysics: a practical introduction, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press, 2016.
47.
BrownTCPetersonGL.An Enquiry Into the Method of Paired Comparison: Reliability, Scaling, and Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-216WWW. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2009.
48.
FotiosSAChealC.A comparison of simultaneous and sequential brightness judgements. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 183–197.
49.
Rajae-JoordensREngelJ.Paired comparisons in visual perception studies using small sample sizes. Displays2005; 26: 1–7.
50.
ThurstoneLL.A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review1927; 34: 273–286.
51.
StokkermansMVogelsIde KortYHeynderickxI.A comparison of methodologies to investigate the influence of light on the atmosphere of a space. Leukos2018; 14: 167–191.
52.
The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers – The Society of Light and Lighting. Lighting Guide 7: Lighting for Offices. London: CIBSE, 2022.
53.
HuangH-PWeiMOuL-C.Effect of text-background lightness combination on visual comfort for reading on a tablet display under different surrounds. Color Research and Application2019; 44: 54–64.
54.
ChraibiSCrommentuijnLvan LoenenERosemannA.Influence of wall luminance and uniformity on preferred task illuminance. Building and Environment2017; 117: 24–35.
55.
WangYZhongXZhangYTuYWangLChenY, et al. Visual fatigue following long-term visual display terminal work under different light sources. Lighting Research & Technology2017; 49: 1034–1051.
56.
RolfHUdovicicLVölkerS.Light exposure in home-based work: can a simple lighting system increase alertness?Lighting Research and Technology2023; 56: 169–184.
57.
de VriesASoumanJLde RuyterBHeynderickxIde KortYAW.Lighting up the office: The effect of wall luminance on room appraisal, office workers’ performance, and subjective alertness. Building and Environment2018; 142: 534–543.
58.
OuL-CSunP-LHuangH-PRonnier LuoM.Visual comfort as a function of lightness difference between text and background: a cross-age study using an LCD and a tablet computer. Color Research and Application2015; 40: 125–134.
59.
AkashiYKunoYMurakamiKInataniMAokiT.A readability model of letters with various letter size, luminance contrast and adaptation luminance levels for seniors. Lighting Research and Technology2022; 54: 475–495.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
