Correlated color temperature (CCT) is a one-dimensional metric that aims to quantify the perceived visual quality of nominal white light sources. It is often used as a proxy for the color quality of light sources due to its ease of use. However, CCT lacks the accuracy in communicating color information for research purposes. Two light sources with identical CCTs can appear perceptually different, and these differences are not estimated by CCT due to the loss of information caused by reducing spectral power distribution of light sources into a one-dimensional metric. Using supplemental metrics in addition to CCT, providing the absolute spectral power distribution of light sources in graphical and tabular form, and documenting and accounting for potential confounding factors, such as chromatic adaptation, can increase the validity of research results, improve the repeatability of studies, and help address replication concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HydeEP. A new determination of the selective radiation from Tantalum. Physical Review (Series I)1911; 32: 632–633.
2.
HuntRWGPointerMR. Measuring Colour. 4th ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
3.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. Colorimetry. CIE 015:2018. Vienna: CIE, 2018.
4.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. ILV: International Lighting Vocabulary. CIE S 017:2020. Vienna: CIE, 2020.
5.
MacAdamDL. Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. Journal of the Optical Society of America1942; 32: 247–274.
6.
WrightWD. The sensitivity of the eye to small colour differences. Proceedings of the Physical Society1941; 53: 93–112.
7.
BrownWRJ. Color discrimination of twelve observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America1957; 47: 137–143.
8.
JuddDBYonemuraGT. CIE 1960 UCS diagram and the Mller theory of color vision. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section A: Physics and Chemistry1970; 74A: 23–30.
9.
WyszeckiGFielderGH. New color-matching ellipses. Journal of the Optical Society of America1971; 61: 1135–1152.
10.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. Chromaticity Difference Specification for Light Sources. CIE TN 001. Vienna: CIE, 2014.
11.
PriestIG. The colorimetry and photometry of daylight and incandescent illuminants by the method of rotatory dispersion*. Journal of the Optical Society of America1923; 7: 1175–1209.
12.
DavisR. A correlated color temperature for illuminants. Bureau of Standards Journal of Research1931; 7: 659.
13.
McCamyCS. Correlated color temperature as an explicit function of chromaticity coordinates. Color Research & Application1992; 17: 142–144.
14.
RobertsonAR. Computation of correlated color temperature and distribution temperature. Journal of the Optical Society of America1968; 58: 1528–1535.
15.
KrystekM. An algorithm to calculate correlated colour temperature. Color Research & Application1985; 10: 38–40.
16.
WalterW. Determination of correlated color temperature based on a color-appearance model. Color Research & Application1992; 17: 24–30.
17.
GardnerJL. Correlated colour temperature–uncertainty and estimation. Metrologia2000; 37: 381–384.
18.
OhnoY. Practical use and calculation of CCT and Duv. Leukos2014; 10: 47–55.
19.
LiCCuiGMelgosaMRuanXZhangYMaL, et al.Accurate method for computing correlated color temperature. Optics Express2016; 24: 14066–14078.
20.
BennettCAReyP. What’s so hot about red?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society1972; 14: 149–154.
21.
WierzbickaA. The meaning of color terms: semantics, culture, and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics1990; 1: 99–150.
22.
SchandaJ. Colorimetry: Understanding the CIE System. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
23.
GrumFSaundersSBMacAdamDL. Concept of correlated color temperature. Color Research & Application1978; 3: 17–21.
24.
BorbélyÁSámsonÁSchandaJ. The concept of correlated colour temperature revisited. Color Research and Application2001; 26: 450–457.
25.
HuntRWG. Light and dark adaptation and the perception of color. Journal of the Optical Society of America1952; 42: 190–199.
26.
PridmoreRW. Bezold-Brucke hue-shift as functions of luminance level, luminance ratio, interstimulus interval and adapting white for aperture and object colors. Vision Research1999; 39: 3873–3891.
27.
StevensJCStevensSS. Brightness function: effects of adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America1963; 53: 375–385.
28.
JamesonDHurvichLM. Essay concerning color constancy. Annual Review of Psychology1989; 40: 1–24.
29.
FairchildMDReniffL. Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1995; 12: 824–833.
30.
ShevellSK. The time course of chromatic adaptation. Color Research & Application2001; 26: S170–S173.
31.
NeitzJCarrollJYamauchiYNeitzMWilliamsDR. Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults. Neuron2002; 35: 783–792.
32.
YamauchiY. Chromatic adaptation can cause long-term shifts in color appearance that arise in binocular visual pathways. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science2001; 42: S720.
33.
WeiMChenS. Effects of adapting luminance and CCT on appearance of white and degree of chromatic adaptation. Optics Express2019; 27: 9276–9286.
34.
ZhaiQLuoMR. Study of chromatic adaptation via neutral white matches on different viewing media. Optics Express2018; 26: 7724–7739.
35.
WernerA. The spatial tuning of chromatic adaptation. Vision Research2003; 43: 1611–1623.
36.
WernerASharpeLTZrennerE. Asymmetries in the time-course of chromatic adaptation and the significance of contrast. Vision Research2000; 40: 1101–1113.
37.
WyszeckiGStilesWS. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1982.
38.
SchandaJDanyiM. Correlated color-temperature calculations in the CIE 1976 chromaticity diagram. Color Research & Application1977; 2: 161–163.
39.
TakamuraSKobayashiN. Practical extension to CIELUV color space to improve uniformity: Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, Rochester, NY, September 2–25, 2002.
40.
KwakYOhnoYHaH. Vision experiment on perception of correlated colour temperature: CIE 2017 Midterm Meetings and Conference on Smarter Lighting for Better Life, South Korea, Jeju, October 23–25, 2017: 23–25.
FairchildMD. Color Appearance Models. 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
43.
KruithofAA. Tubular luminescence lamps for general illumination. Philips Technical Review1941; 6: 65–96.
44.
DavisRGGinthnerDN. Correlated color temperature, illuminance level, and the Kruithof curve. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society1990; 19: 27–38.
45.
BoycePRCuttleC. Effect of correlated colour temperature on the perception of interiors and colour discrimination performance. Lighting Research & Technology1990; 22: 19–36.
46.
ViénotFDurandMLMahlerE. Kruithof’s rule revisited using LED illumination. Journal of Modern Optics2009; 56: 1433–1446.
47.
FotiosS. A revised Kruithof graph based on empirical data. Leukos2017; 13: 3–17.
48.
WeiMHouserKW. What is the cause of apparent preference for sources with chromaticity below the blackbody locus?. Leukos2016; 12: 95–99.
49.
RoyerMWilkersonAWeiM. Human perceptions of colour rendition at different chromaticities. Lighting Research & Technology2018; 50: 965–994.
50.
Anqing LiuATuzikasAŽukauskasAVaicekauskasRVittaPShurM. Cultural preferences to color quality of illumination of different artwork objects revealed by a color rendition engine. IEEE Photonics Journal2013; 5: 6801010.
51.
BodrogiPLinYXiaoXStojanovicDKhanhT. Intercultural observer preference for perceived illumination chromaticity for different coloured object scenes. Lighting Research & Technology2017; 49: 305–315.
52.
PokornyJSmithVCWesnerMF. Variability in cone populations and implications. In From Pigments to Perception. Boston, MA: Springer, 1991: 23–34.
53.
HoferHSingerBWilliamsDR. Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment. Journal of Vision2005; 5: 444–454.
54.
WebsterMAMacLeodDIA. Factors underlying individual differences in the color matches of normal observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1988; 5: 1722–1735.
55.
Ji Chang HeJCShevellSK. Individual differences in cone photopigments of normal trichromats measured by dual Rayleigh-type color matches. Vision Research1994; 34: 367–376.
56.
Commission International de l’Éclairage. Fundamental Chromaticity Diagram with Physiological Axes - Part 1. CIE 170-1:2006. Vienna: CIE, 2006.
HuangMXiYPanJHeRLiX. Colorimetric observer categories for young and aged using paired-comparison experiments. IEEE Access2020; 8: 219473–219482.
59.
NägeleT. Problems and requirements of the optical characterization of LEDs: Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on LED Measurement, Maryland, USA, May 11–12, 2001: 5–9.
60.
AshdownIE. Chromaticity and color temperature for architectural lighting: Solid State Lighting II of International Society for Optics and Photonics, Seattle, WA, July 7–11, 2002, 51–60.
61.
HuXHouserKW. Large-field color matching functions. Color Research & Application2006; 31: 18–29.
62.
American National Standard Institute. American National Standard for Electric Lamps—Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting Products. C78.377-2008Rosslyn (VA). Rosslyn, VA: American National Standard Lighting Group, 2008, 17.
63.
VázquezDFernández-BalbuenaAACanabalHMuroCDurmusDDavisW, et al.Energy optimization of a light projection system for buildings that virtually restores artworks. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage2020; 16: e00128.
64.
DurmusDDavisW. Object color naturalness and attractiveness with spectrally optimized illumination. Optics Express2017; 25: 12839–12850.
65.
DurmusDAbdallaDDuisADavisW. Spectral optimization to minimize light absorbed by artwork. Leukos2020; 16: 45–54.
66.
DavisWOhnoY. Color quality scale. Optical Engineering2010; 49: 033602.
67.
WithouckMSmetKAGRyckaertWRHanselaerP. Experimental driven modelling of the color appearance of unrelated self-luminous stimuli: CAM15u. Optics Express2015; 23: 12045–12064.
68.
HermansSSmetKAGHanselaerP. Color appearance model for self-luminous stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2018; 35: 2000–2009.
69.
FotiosSALevermoreGJ. Chromatic effect on apparent brightness in interior spaces I: introduction and colour gamut models. Lighting Research and Technology1998; 30: 97–102.
70.
SagawaKTakeichiK. System of mesopic photometry for evaluating lights in terms of comparative brightness relationships. Journal of the Optical Society of America A1992; 9: 1240–1246.
71.
KinsmanTFairchildMPelzJ. Color is not a metric space implications for pattern recognition, machine learning, and computer vision: Western New York Image Processing Workshop, New York, NY, November 9, 2012, 37–40.
72.
RoyerMHouserKDurmusDEspositoTWeiM. Recommended methods for conducting human factors experiments on the subjective evaluation of colour rendition. Lighting Research & Technology2021, 14771535211019864.
