The general environmental factors that influence fixation distribution as part of pedestrian visual behaviour under natural conditions are unclear. Relative luminance and saliency are considered the parameters for predicting image-based fixation; however, they are not confirmed by evidence from the natural walking scenario. Field experiments using mobile eye-tracking glasses device were conducted on 16 participants in four commercial streets during day and night. Fixation data along with processed images extracted from eye-tracking glass video were analysed to investigate if relative luminance or saliency correlates with fixation distribution while walking. The results show that fixations within a 10° viewing angle were distributed in bright and more salient areas in the field of vision. Statistical analyses found a stronger positive correlation in saliency than in relative luminance and at night-time rather than under daylight. The correlation found between relative luminance/saliency and fixation distribution suggests that relative luminance/saliency may attract the visual attention of pedestrians. It will be beneficial for practical applications via a better visual environment, including lighting and guiding facilities for pedestrians, especially at night.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HasanYNalanDYSevgiY. Effects of snow-reflected light levels on human visual comfort. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment2008; 144: 367–375.
2.
WheelerCP. Spectral qualities of light: effects on human perception and the human visual system, Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, 2016.
3.
International Commission on Illumination. CIE 236:2019. Lighting for pedestrians: a summary of empirical data, Vienna: CIE, 2019.
4.
RizzolattiGRiggioLDascolaICarloU. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia1987; 25: 31–40.
5.
LandMFLeeDN. Where we look when we steer. Nature1994; 369: 742–744.
6.
DavoudianNRaynhamP. What do pedestrians look at at night?Lighting Research and Technology2012; 44: 438–448.
7.
FotiosSUttleyJChealCHaraN. Using eye-tracking to identify pedestrians’ critical visual tasks, Part 1. Dual task approach. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 133–148.
8.
FotiosSUttleyJYangB. Using eye-tracking to identify pedestrians’ critical visual tasks. Part 2. Fixation on pedestrians. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 149–160.
9.
FotiosSYangBUttleyJ. Observing other pedestrians: investigating the typical distance and duration of fixation. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 548–564.
10.
ManavB. An experimental study on the appraisal of the visual environment at offices in relation to colour temperature and illuminance. Building and Environment2007; 42: 979–983.
11.
BelliaLBisegnaFSpadaG. Lighting in indoor environments: visual and non-visual effects of light sources with different spectral power distributions. Building and Environment2011; 46: 1984–1992.
12.
ToscaniMValsecchiMGegenfurtnerKR. Optimal sampling of visual information for lightness judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2013; 110: 11163–11168.
13.
KriegerGRentschlerIHauskeGSchillKZetzscheC. Object and scene analysis by saccadic eye-movements: an investigation with higher-order statistics. Spatial Vision2000; 13: 201–214.
14.
MannanSKRuddockKHWoodingDS. Fixation patterns made during brief examination of two-dimensional images. Perception1997; 26: 1059–1072.
15.
ReinagelPZadorAM. Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network: Computation in Neural Systems1999; 10: 341–350.
16.
Koch C, Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. In: L.M. Vaina (ed) Matters of Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 115–141.
17.
IttiLKochC. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research2000; 40: 1489–1506.
18.
ParkhurstDLawKNieburE. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research2002; 42: 107–123.
19.
PetersRJIyerAIttiLKochC. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Vision Research2005; 45: 2397–2416.
20.
TatlerBWBaddeleyRJGilchristID. Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time. Vision Research2005; 45: 643–659.
21.
NantheeraAKatherineAJDBurnJFGilchristIDBullDR. Fixation prediction and visual priority maps for biped locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics2018; 48: 2294–2306.
22.
LandMFHayhoeM. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?Vision Research2001; 41: 3559–3565.
23.
FoulshamTWalkerEKingstoneA. The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research2011; 51: 1920–1931.
24.
EinhäuserWSpainMPeronaP. Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. Journal of Vision2008; 8: 18, 11–26.
25.
de HaasBIakovidisALSchwarzkopfDSGegenfurtnerKR. Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2019; 116: 11687–11692.
26.
CorniaMBaraldiLSerraGCucchiaraR. Predicting human eye fixations via an lstm-based saliency attentive model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing2018; 27: 5142–5154.
27.
KümmererMWallisTSABethgeM. Information-theoretic model comparison unifies saliency metrics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2015; 112: 16054–16059.
28.
HayhoeMBallardD. Eye movements in natural behavior. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences2005; 9: 188–194.
29.
RothkopfCABallardDHHayhoeMM. Task and context determine where you look. Journal of Vision2007; 7: 1–20.
30.
Henderson JM, Brockmole JR, Castelhano MS, Mack M. Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In: van Gompel RG, Fischer MH, Murray WS, and Hill RL (eds) Eye movements: a window on mind and brain. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, 2007, pp. 537–562.
31.
Carpenter PA, Just MA. What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In: Rayner K (ed) Eye movements in reading: perceptual and language processes. New York: Academic Press, 1983, pp. 275–307.
32.
Harel J, Koch C, Perona P. Graph-based visual saliency. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on neural information processing systems. Canada: MIT Press, 2006, pp. 545–552.
33.
LiuYYuFChenY. Text location in image based on connected-component and statistical features. Computer Engineering and Applications2016; 52: 165–168.
