Correspondence: Discussion of ‘The cross validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics’

Fotios S . Research Note: Uncertainty in subjective evaluation of discomfort glare. Lighting Research and Technology 2015; 47: 379–383.

Fotios S . Correspondence: New methods for the evaluation of discomfort glare. Lighting Research and Technology 2018; 50: 489–491.

Wienold J Iwata T Khanie MS Erell E Kaftan E Rodriguez RG Garreton JAY Tzempelikos T Konstantzos I Christoffersen J Kuhn TE Pierson C Andersen M . Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics. Lighting Research and Technology 2019; 51: 983–1013.

Iwata T Itoh D Hirano Y . Contrast effect and grand total effect on discomfort glare. Journal of Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) 2007; 72: 1–7.

Iwata T, Sasaki Y, Mochizuki E, Itoh D. Evaluation of contrast glare and saturation glare by using by the average luminance of the visual field: Proceedings of Balkan Light, 2008: pp.141–146.

Iwata T Sasaki Y Itoh D Mochizuki D . The range of the total-amount glare determined by the average luminance of the visual field. Journal of Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) 2009; 74: 25–31.

Iwata T, Osterhaus W. Assessment of discomfort glare in daylit offices using luminance distribution images: Proceedings of CIE 2010, Vienna, 2010: pp.174–179.

Wasilewski S Grobe LO Wienold J Andersen M . A critical literature review of spatio-temporal simulation methods for daylight glare assessment. SDAR Journal of Sustainable Design and Applied Research 2019; 7: Article 4–4.

Kent MG Fotios S Cheung T . Stimulus range bias leads to different settings when using luminance adjustment to evaluate discomfort due to glare. Building and Environment 2019; 153: 281–287.