Architectural developments over the past 50 years have been dramatic and have been paralleled by active research in lighting. This review traces architectural themes and the corresponding concerns of lighting researchers and explores how they have applied the results of scientific research into lighting design and application.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FazioMMoffettMWodehouseL. A World History of Architecture, London: Laurence King Publishing, 2009, pp. p. 517–p. 517.
2.
WatkinD. A History of Western Architecture, London: Laurence King Publishing, 2011, pp. p. 652–p. 652.
3.
WebbM. Architecture in Britain Today, Middlesex: Country Life Books, 1969, pp. p. 40–p. 40.
4.
Foster M (editor) The Principles of Architecture: Style, Structure and Design. London: New Burlington Books, 1983: p. 107.
5.
PlummerH. The Architecture of Natural Light, London: Thames and Hudson, 2009. pp.126–129.
6.
The Berlin Package (English translation). Munich: arsEdition, 2001: pp. 5–7.
7.
PhillipsD. Daylighting: Natural Light in Architecture, London: Architectural Press, 2004. pp. 72–75.
8.
Lacy B (editor). 100 Contemporary Architects: Drawings and Sketches. London: Thames and Hudson, 1991: pp. 74–75.
9.
PhillipsD. The Lit Environment, London: Architectural Press, 2002, pp. p. 33–p. 33.
10.
RibeiroJSAllenWADe AmorimM. Lighting of the Calouste Gulbenkian museum. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 79–98.
11.
Ne’emanEHopkinsonRG. Critical minimum acceptable window size: A study of window design and provision of view. Lighting Research and Technology1970; 2: 17–27.
12.
BallinHH. The lighting designer. Lighting Research and Technology1969; 1: 1–7.
13.
SteckB. European practice in the integration of lighting, air conditioning and acoustics in offices. Lighting Research and Technology1969; 1: 8–23.
14.
MarsdenAM. What do we want from our lighting?Lighting Research and Technology1972; 4: 139–150.
15.
AldworthRCBridgersDJ. Design for variety in lighting. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 8–23.
16.
CollinsJBPlantCGH. Preferred luminance distribution in windowless spaces. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 219–231.
17.
WaldramJM. Studies in interior lighting. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society (London)1954; 19: 95–124.
18.
CuttleC. Lighting patterns and the flow of light. Lighting Research and Technology1971; 3: 171–189.
19.
HuntDRG. Improved daylight data for predicting energy savings from photoelectric controls. Lighting Research and Technology1979; 11: 9–23.
20.
McKennanGTParryCM. An investigation of task lighting for offices. Lighting Research and Technology1984; 16: 171–186.
21.
CollinsJB. The illuminating engineer in a changing world. Lighting Research and Technology1977; 9: 1–10.
22.
BellRIPageRK. The need for a unified approach to interior lighting design parameters. Lighting Research and Technology1981; 13: 49–57.
23.
Illuminating Engineering Society. IES Technical Report No. 15 The Multiple Criterion Design Method. London: IES, 1977: p. 6.
24.
CarterDJ. A computer aid to multiple criterion design. Lighting Research and Technology1981; 13: 153–157.
25.
LoeDLRowlandsEWatsonNF. Preferred lighting conditions for the display of oil and watercolour paintings. Lighting Research and Technology1982; 14: 173–192.
26.
ThomsonG. The Museum Environment, London: Butterworths, 1978.
27.
WaldramJM. A manual of perspective for lighting engineers. Lighting Research and Technology1982; 14: 65–101.
28.
LoeDLMansfieldKPRowlandsE. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: Experimental study. Lighting Research and Technology1994; 26: 119–133.
29.
CuttleC. Sumpner’s principle: A discussion. Lighting Research and Technology1991; 23: 99–106.
30.
LittlefairPJ. Innovative daylighting: Review of systems and evaluation methods. Lighting Research and Technology1990; 22: 1–17.
31.
CuttleC. Lighting works of art for exhibition and conservation. Lighting Research and Technology1988; 20: 43–53.
32.
AyersMJCarterD. Remote source electric lighting. Lighting Research and Technology1995; 27: 1–15.
33.
Cannon-Brookes S (editor). Future trends in lighting. Lighting Research and Technology 1998; 30: 63–68.
34.
LoeDLRowlandsE. The art and science of lighting: A strategy for lighting design. Lighting Research and Technology1996; 28: 153–164.
35.
CuttleC. Cubic illumination. Lighting Research and Technology1997; 29: 1–14.
36.
MoeckM. Lighting design based on luminance contrast. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 55–63.
37.
LoeDLMansfieldKPRowlandsE. A step in quantifying the appearance of a lit scene. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 213–222.
38.
CuttleC. Brightness, lightness and providing ‘a preconceived appearance to the interior’. Lighting Research and Technology2004; 36: 201–216.
39.
MooreTCarterDJSlaterAI. A study of opinion in offices with and without user controlled lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2004; 36: 131–144.
40.
Cannon-BrookesS. Daylighting museum galleries: A review of performance criteria. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 161–168.
41.
NgE. A simplified daylighting tool for high-density urban residential buildings. Lighting Research and Technology2001; 33: 259–272.
42.
MatusiakBAschehongØLittlefairP. Daylighting strategies for an infinitely long atrium: An experimental evaluation. Lighting Research and Technology1999; 31: 23–34.
43.
MardaljevicJ. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Lighting Research and Technology1995; 27: 181–188.
44.
CuttleC. A new direction for general lighting practice. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45: 22–39.
45.
BoycePRSmetKAG. LRT symposium ‘better metrics for better lighting’–a summary. Lighting Research and Technology2014; 46: 619–636.
46.
CuttleC. Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 73–90.
47.
LeslieRPRadetskyLCSmithAM. Conceptual design metric for daylighting. Lighting Research and Technology2012; 44: 277–290.
48.
VeitchJANewshamGRBoycePRJonesCC. Lighting appraisal, well-being and performance in open-plan offices: A linked mechanisms approach. Lighting Research and Technology2008; 40: 133–151.
49.
CsutiPFáyASchandaJSzabóFTátraiV. Colour fidelity for picture gallery illumination, part 2: Test sample selection – Museum tests. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 529–530.
50.
ZhaiQYLuoMRLiuXY. The impact of illuminance and colour temperature on viewing fine art paintings under LED lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 795–809.
51.
SchielkeT. Light and corporate identity: Using lighting for corporate communication. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 285–295.
52.
CustersPJMde KortYAWIJsselsteijnWAde KruiffME. Lighting in retail environments: Atmosphere perception in the real world. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 331–343.
53.
SchielkeTLeudesdorffM. Impact of lighting design on brand image for fashion retail stores. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 672–692.
54.
TorringtonJMTregenzaPR. Lighting for people with dementia. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 81–97.
55.
DickR. Applied scotobiology in luminaire design. Lighting Research and Technology2014; 46: 50–66.
56.
Cayless MA, Marsden AM (editors). Lamps and Lighting. London: Edward Arnold, 1983: p. 43.
