Colour preference,naturalness,vividness and colour quality metrics,Part 4: Experiments with still life arrangements at different correlated colour temperatures
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2018
Colour preference,naturalness,vividness and colour quality metrics,Part 4: Experiments with still life arrangements at different correlated colour temperatures
Subjective colour preference, naturalness and vividness assessments of two different colourful still life arrangements viewed in a real room were analysed and modelled with the aid of the Rf colour fidelity metric combined with a chroma difference metric. Coloured objects were illuminated by a four-channel LED light engine with 36 different spectra at four correlated colour temperatures and nine object oversaturation levels. Results imply a significant dependence of the subjective judgments on correlated colour temperature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KhanhTQBodrogiPVinhQT. Color Quality of Semiconductor and Conventional Light Sources, Berlin: Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2017.
2.
ReaMSFigueiroMGBiermanABulloughJD. Circadian light. Journal of Circadian Rhythms2010; 8: 2–2.
3.
KhanhTQBodrogiP. Ganzheitliche Optimierung – human centric lighting und Farbwahrnehmung – Teil 1. Licht2015; 5: 74–80.
4.
BodrogiPKhanhTQ. Ganzheitliche Optimierung – human centric lighting und Farbwahrnehmung – Teil 2. Licht2015; 6: 66–73.
5.
RautkyläEPuolakkaMHalonenL. Alerting effects of daytime light exposure – a proposed link between light exposure and brain mechanisms. Lighting Research and Technology2012; 44: 238–252.
6.
KhanhTQBodrogiPVinhQTWinklerH. LED Lighting – Technology and Perception, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2014.
7.
Rea MS, Bierman A. A new rationale for setting light source luminous efficacy requirements. Lighting Research and Technology 2016. DOI: 1477153516668230.
8.
KhanhTQBodrogiPVinhQTStojanovicD. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics – Part 1: Experiments in a real room. Lighting Research and Technology2016. DOI: 1477153516643359.
9.
KhanhTQBodrogiPVinhQTStojanovicD. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics – Part 2: Experiments in a viewing booth and analysis of the combined dataset. Lighting Research and Technology2016. DOI: 1477153516643570.
10.
KhanhTQBodrogiP. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics – Part 3: Experiments with makeup products and analysis of the complete warm white dataset. Lighting Research and Technology2016. DOI: 1477153516669558.
11.
DavidAFiniPTHouserKWWhiteheadL. Development of the IES method for evaluating the colour rendition of light sources. Optics Express2015; 23: 15888–15906.
12.
SmetKRyckaertWRPointerMRDeconinckGHanselaerP. A memory colour quality metric for white light sources. Energy and Buildings2012; 49: 216–225.
BodrogiPLinYXiaoXStojanovicDKhanhTQ. Intercultural observer preference for perceived illumination chromaticity for different coloured object scenes. Lighting Research and Technology2015. DOI: 1477153515616435.
15.
BodrogiPBrücknerSKrauseNKhanhTQ. Semantic interpretation of colour differences and colour-rendering indices. Color Research and Application2014; 39: 252–262.
16.
Bodrogi P, Guo X, Khanh TQ. Colour surface rendering: a new aspect of light source colour quality for museum lighting: Proceedings of the 4th CIE Symposium on Colour and Visual Appearance, Prague, Sep 5–7: 2016.
17.
RoyerMPWilkersonAWeiMHouserKDavisR. Human perceptions of colour rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Lighting Research and Technology2016. DOI: 1477153516663615.
