LED technology provides new opportunities to change the illuminance on pedestrian pathways in response to the presence of people. This study explores possible effects of dimming as such on walking, legibility and perception. In an indoor full-scale laboratory, 61 participants walked along a 19-m pathway with a motion-detection sensor 10 m before an LED luminaire. The participants walked significantly slower under dimmed than static lighting conditions, even after the illuminance had increased. Legibility decreased with the extent of dimming. The larger the difference in illuminance between dimmed and full light, the stronger the self-reported reaction. The results indicate that changes in illuminance affect walking, and that legibility and perception are affected by the overall lighting design of pedestrian pathways rather than by dimming as such.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfonzoM. To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior2005; 37: 808–836.
2.
ErwingRCerveroR. Travel and built environment: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association2010; 76: 265–294.
3.
LeeCMoudonAV. Neighbourhood design and physical activity. Building Research and Information2008; 3: 395–411.
4.
Loukaitou-SiderisA. Is it safe to walk? Neighborhood safety and security considerations and their effects on walking. Journal of Planning Literature2006; 30: 219–232.
5.
JagoRBaranowskiTZakeriIHarrisM. Observed environmental features and the physical activity of adolescent males. American Journal of Preventive Medicine2005; 29: 98–104.
6.
RosenbergDEHuangDLSimonovichSDBelzaB. Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. The Gerontologist2013; 53: 268–279.
Ejhed J, Branzell P-H, Theocharaoudis D. Human related urban-lighting by advanced control system: Proceedings of 28th CIE Session, Manchester, UK, June 28 –July 4: 2015.
14.
HaansAde KortYAW. Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology2012; 32: 342–352.
15.
ViliunasVVaitkeviciusHStanikunasRVittaPBliumasRAuškalnyteATuzikasAPetrulisADabasinskasLZukasuskasA. Subjective evaluation of luminance distribution for intelligent outdoor lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2014; 46: 421–433.
16.
FotiosSUnwinJFarrallS. Road lighting and pedestrian reassurance after dark: a review. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 449–469.
17.
Rahm J, Johansson, M. Walking after dark: a systematic literature review of pedestrians’ response to outdoor lighting. Environmental Psychology Monographs, No 24. Lund University, 2016.
18.
JohanssonMGyllinMWitzellJKüllerM. Quality matters: direct and reflected appraisal of temperate deciduous broad leaf forests. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening2014; 13: 28–37.
19.
NasarJL. Assessing perceptions of environments for active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine2008; 34: 357–363.
20.
PainterK. The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark. Landscape and Urban Planning1996; 35: 193–201.
21.
HerbertDDavidsonN. Modifying the built environment: the impact of improved street lighting. Geoforum1994; 25: 339–350.
22.
ItohN. Visual guidance of walking: Effects of illumination level and edge emphasis. Gerontechnology2006; 5: 246–252.
23.
ChoiJ-SKangD-WShinY-HTackG-R. Differences in gait pattern between the elderly and the young during level walking under low illumination. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics2014; 16: 3–9.
24.
MoserGUzzellDEnvironmental psychology. In: MillonTLernerMJ (eds). Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 5. Personality and Social Psychology, New York: J Wiley and Sons, 2013, pp. 419–444.
25.
BonaiutoMFornaraFBonnesM. Perceived residential environment quality in middle- and low-extension Italian cities. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliqué2006; 56: 23–34.
26.
FornaraFBonaiutoMBonnesM. Cross-validation of abbreviated perceived residential environment quality (PREQ) and neighborhood attachment (NA) indicators. Environment and Behavior2010; 42: 171–196.
27.
JohanssonMPedersenEMaleetipwan MattsonPKuhnLLaikeT. Perceived outdoor lighting quality (POLQ): a lighting assessment tool. Journal of Environmental Psychology2014; 39: 14–21.
28.
JohanssonMRosénMKüllerR. Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research and Technology2011; 43: 31–43.
29.
KuhnLJohanssonMLaikeTGovenT. Residents’ perceptions following retrofitting of residential area outdoor lighting with LEDs. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45: 568–584.
30.
GaterslebenBUzzellD. Affective appraisal of the daily commute: Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior2007; 39: 416–431.
31.
Johansson M, Sternudd C, Kärrholm M. Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking. Journal of Urban Design 2016; 21: 256–275.
32.
StockmanASharpeLT. Into the twilight zone: the complexity of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics2006; 26: 225–239.
33.
BoycePR. Human Factors in Lighting, 2nd. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003.
34.
BenjaminWJ. Borish’s Clinical Refraction, 2nd. St. Louis, MO: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, 2006.
35.
HurleyJB. Shedding light on adaptation. Journal of General Physiology2002; 19: 125–128.
36.
BalfourJLKaplanGJ. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Epidemiology2002; 155: 507–515.
37.
BernhoftIMCarstensenG. Preferences and behavior of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F2008; 11: 83–95.
FieldA. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2009.
40.
DonkerSFKruisheerJKooiF. Pedestrian walking speed as a tool to study environment-behavior: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference on Environmental Psychology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, , 26–28 September: 2011.
41.
GovénTLaikeTPendseBSjöbergK. The background luminance and colour temperatures influence on alertness and mental health: Proceedings of the 26th Session of the CIE, Beijing, China, , 4–11 July: 2007: D608–D611.
42.
KaramouziAPapalexopoulosDStavridouATzimopoulouSVaroudisTDLD. Dynamic lighting design: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Athens, Greece, July 18–19: 2013: pp.71–76.
43.
JuntunenETetriETapaninenOYrjänäSKondratyevVSitomaniemiASiirtolaHSarjanojaEMAikioJHeikkinenV. A smart LED luminaire for energy savings in pedestrian road lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2015; 47: 103–115.
44.
KybaCCMHänelAHölkerF. Redefining efficiency for outdoor lighting. Energy and Environmental Science2014; 7: 1806–1809.
