Flashing yellow warning lights are important for worker and driver safety in work zones. Current standards for these lights do not address whether and how they should be coordinated to provide directional information to drivers navigating through work zones. A field study was conducted to assess driver responses to warning lights. The luminous intensities and flash patterns of warning lights along a simulated work zone were varied during daytime and nighttime. During the daytime, driver responses were relatively insensitive to warning light characteristics, although drivers preferred sequential and synchronised flash patterns over random, uncoordinated flashing. At nighttime, the combination of a temporal peak luminous intensity of 25 cd and a sequential flash pattern was optimal for providing directional information. A single initial warning light having a higher luminous intensity may help drivers detect the work zone without creating unacceptable visual discomfort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. Equipment and Material Standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, ST-017B. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
2.
Bullough JD, Rea MS. Luminous intensity requirements for service vehicle warning beacons: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 11–15 January 2015. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2015.
3.
Bullough JD, Rea MS. Warning beacon characteristics for visibility, glare prevention and closure detection: Proceedings of the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage 28th Session, Manchester, UK, 28 June – 4 July: 2015: 877–882.
4.
BulloughJDReaMS. Impacts of fog characteristics, forward illumination, and warning beacon intensity distribution on roadway hazard visibility. The Scientific World Journal2016DOI: 10.1155/2016/4687816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4687816.
5.
Federal Aviation Administration. Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids, AC 150/5340-30H. Washington, DC: FAA, 2014.
6.
CookSQuigleyCCliftL. Motor Vehicle and Pedal Cycle Conspicuity: Vehicle Mounted Warning Beacons, Loughborough, UK: University of Loughborough, 2000.
7.
CrawfordA. The perception of light signals: the effect of the number of irrelevant lights. Ergonomics1962; 5: 417–428.
8.
ReaMSBulloughJD. Toward performance specifications for flashing warning beacons. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour2016(in press).
9.
Society of Automotive Engineers. Optical Warning Devices for Authorized Emergency, Maintenance and Service Vehicles, J845, Warrendale, PA: SAE, 2007.
10.
Society of Automotive Engineers. Directional Flashing Optical Warning Devices for Authorized Emergency, Maintenance and Service Vehicles, J595, Warrendale, PA: SAE, 2008.
11.
U.S. Coast Guard. Annex I: Positioning and Technical Details of Lights and Shapes, Code of Federal Regulations Title 33, Part 84, Section 13, Washington, DC: U.S. Coast Guard, 2011.
12.
Federal Aviation Administration. Light Sources Other Than Incandescent and Xenon for Airport and Obstruction Lighting Fixtures, Engineering Brief 67D, Washington, DC: FAA, 2012.
13.
Steele DA, Zabecki JM, Zimmerman L. Improving the Effectiveness of Nighttime Temporary Traffic Control Warning Devices, Volume 2: Evaluation of Nighttime Mobile Warning Lights. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Transportation, 2013.
14.
FinleyMUllmanGDudekC. Sequential warning-light system for work-zone lane closures. Transportation Research Record2001; 1745: 39–45.
15.
SunCEdaraPHouYRobertsonA. Does sequential warning lights make nighttime work zones tapers safer?International Municipal Signal Association Journal2013; 51: 50–53.
16.
Khan SA. Work zone safety: perceptual countermeasures to speeding using synchronized warning lights: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 27 September – 1 October: 2010: 1860-1864.
17.
BulloughJDSnyderJDSkinnerNPReaMS. Development and evaluation of a prototype barricade lighting system. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering2012; 2: 118–132.
18.
Rea MS. (ed.) IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application. 9th Edition, New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2000.
19.
FryG. Evaluating disability effects of approaching automobile headlights. Highway Research Bulletin1954; 89: 38–42.
20.
BulloughJD. Spectral sensitivity for extrafoveal discomfort glare. Journal of Modern Optics2009; 56: 1518–1522.
21.
Bullough JD. Luminance versus luminous intensity as a metric for discomfort glare. Automotive Lighting Technology and Human Factors in Driver Vision and Lighting, SP-2300. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2011: 31-35.
22.
BulloughJDSweater HickcoxK. Interactions among light source luminance, illuminance and size on discomfort glare. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars2012; 5: 199–202.
23.
FugateJMFryGA. Relation of changes in pupil size to visual discomfort. Illuminating Engineering1956; 51: 537–549.
24.
IrikuraTToyofukuYAokiY. Borderline between comfort and discomfort of blinking light. Journal of Light and Visual Environment1998; 22: 12–15.
25.
BartleySH. Intermittent photic stimulation at marginal intensity levels. Journal of Psychology1951; 32: 217–223.
26.
BartleySH. Subjective brightness in relation to flash rate and the light-dark ratio. Journal of Experimental Psychology1938; 23: 313–313.
27.
TheeuwesJAlferdinckJWPerelM. Relation between glare and driving performance. Human Factors2002; 44: 95–107.
28.
Van Derlofske J, Bullough JD, Dee P, Chen J, Akashi Y. Headlamp Parameters and Glare. Lighting, SP-1875. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2004: 195–203.
29.
De LangeH. Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light: attenuation characteristics with white and colored light. Journal of the Optical Society of America1958; 48: 777–784.
30.
Bullough JD, Skinner NP, Pysar RP, Radetsky LC, Smith AM, Rea MS. Nighttime Glare and Driving Performance: Research Findings, DOT HS 811 043. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2008.
31.
Bullough JD, Brons JA, Skinner NP. Preliminary evaluation of dynamic speed displays with conditional messaging: Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 12–16 January: 2014: 10 p.
32.
Bullough JD, Rea MS, Skinner NP. A Ponzo scheme for roadway safety: Modifying chevron size and position to reduce driver speeds on curvesL Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 11–15 January: 2015: 8 p.
33.
De BoerJ. Public Lighting, Eindhoven, Netherlands: Philips Technical Library, 1967.
KaplanEShapleyRM. The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1986; 83: 2755–2757.
36.
ReaM. Visibility criteria and application techniques for roadway lighting. Transportation Research Record1989; 1247: 12–16.
37.
AssumTBjørnskauTFosserSSagbergF. Risk compensation: the case of road lighting. Accident Analysis and Prevention1999; 31: 545–553.
