Lighting conditions in workplaces contribute to a variety of factors related to work satisfaction, productivity and well-being. We tested whether different photometric variables also influence visual perception and the comfort of the lighting, as well as subjective non-visual variables such as mood, alertness and well-being. Twenty-five young subjects spent two afternoons either under electric light or daylighting conditions (without view from the window). Subjects overall preferred the daylighting for visual acceptance and glare. Changes of photometric variables modulated changes in visual light perception, alertness and mood in the course of the afternoon. Finally, we found several associations of visual and non-visual functions, indicating a potential relationship of visual comfort with other circadian and wake-dependent functions in humans, which consequently could impact office lighting scenarios in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RouletC-AJohnerNForadiniFBluyssenPCoxCFernandesEMüllerBAizlewoodC. Perceived health and comfort in relation to energy use and building characteristics. Building Research and Information2006; 34: 467–474.
2.
FiskWJ. Review of health and productivity gains from better IEQ: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finaland, 6--10 August 2000. Finland: SIY Indoor Air Information, 2000. .
3.
VeitchJACharlesKEFarleyKMJNewshamGR. A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology2007; 27: 177–189.
4.
CarlopioJR. Construct validity of a physical work environment satisfaction questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology1996; 1: 330–344.
5.
VeitchJANewshamGRBoycePRJonesCC. Lighting appraisal, well-being and performance in open-plan offices: A linked mechanisms approach. Lighting Research and Technology2008; 40: 133–151.
6.
VeitchJAStokkermansMGMNewshamGR. Linking lighting appraisals to work behaviors. Environment and Behavior2011; 45: 198–214.
7.
VeitchJAGeertsJCharlesKENewshamGRMarquardtCJG. Satisfaction with lighting in open-plan offices: COPE field findings: Proceedings of Lux Europa 2005, Berlin, Germany, 2005, pp. 414–417.
8.
CuttleC. People and windows in workplaces: People and Physical Environment Research Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 1983, pp. 203–212.
9.
HeerwagenJHHeerwagenDR. Lighting and psychological comfort. Lighting Design and Application1986; 16: 47–51.
10.
RocheLDeweyELittlefairP. Occupant reactions to daylight in offices. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 119–126.
11.
VeitchJAHineDWGiffordR. End-users' knowledge, beliefs and preferences for lighting. Journal of Interior Design1993; 19: 15–26.
12.
VeitchJAGiffordR. Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood, and social behavior. Environment and Behavior1996; 28: 446–470.
13.
ReaMS. IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application, 9th. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2000.
14.
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. CIE Collection on Glare, Vienna: CIE, 2002.
15.
NewshamGRVeitchJA. Lighting quality recommendations for VDT offices: A new method of derivation. Lighting Research and Technology2001; 33: 97–116.
16.
BegemannSHAVan den BeldGJTennerAD. Daylight, artificial light and people in an office environment, overview of visual and biological responses. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1997; 20: 231–239.
17.
JunlénHTWoutersMCHMTennerAD. Preferred task-lighting levels in an industrial work area without daylight. Lighting Research and Technology2005; 37: 219–233.
18.
MooreTCarterDJSlaterAI. Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology2003; 35: 43–59.
19.
EscuyerSFontoynontM. Lighting controls: a field study of office workers' reactions. Lighting Research and Technology2001; 33: 77–96.
20.
VeitchJANewshamGR. Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 199–212.
21.
European Committee for Standardization EN 12464-1. Light and Lighting: Lighting of Work Places, Brussels: CEN, 2003. EN 12464-1.
22.
FotiosSAChealC. Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Research and Technology2010; 42: 433–447.
23.
LogadóttirAChristoffersenJFotiosSA. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set the preferred illuminance in a workplace environment. Lighting Research and Technology2011; 43: 403–422.
24.
ScheerFAJLvan DoornenLJPBuijsR. Light and diurnal cycle affect human heart rate: Possible role for the circadian pacemaker. Journal of Biological Rhythms1999; 14: 202–212.
25.
LewyAJWehrTAGoodwinFKNewsomeDAMarkeySP. Light suppresses melatonin secretion in humans. Science1980; 210: 1267–1269.
26.
CajochenC. Alerting effects of light. Sleep Medicine Reviews2007; 11: 453–464.
27.
BadiaPMyersBBoeckerMCulpepperJHarshJR. Bright light effects on body temperature, alertness, EEG and behavior. Physiology and Behavior1991; 50: 583–588.
28.
MünchMKobialkaSSteinerROelhafenPWirz-JusticeACajochenC. Wavelength-dependent effects of evening light exposure on sleep architecture and sleep EEG power density in men. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology2006; 290: 421–428.
29.
SanthiNThorneHCvan der VeenDRJohnsenSMillsSLHommesVSchlangenLJArcherSNDijkDJ. The spectral composition of evening light and individual differences in the suppression of melatonin and delay of sleep in humans. Journal of Pineal Research2011; 53: 47–59.
30.
DijkDJArcherSN. Light, sleep, and circadian rhythms: together again. PLoS Biology2009; 7: e1000145.
31.
ChellappaSLSteinerROelhafenPLangDGötzTKrebsJCajochenC. Acute exposure to evening blue-enriched light impacts on human sleep. Journal of Sleep Research2013; 22: 573–580.
32.
Phipps-NelsonJRedmanJRDijkDJRajaratnamSM. Daytime exposure to bright light, as compared to dim light, decreases sleepiness and improves psychomotor vigilance performance. Sleep2003; 26: 695–700.
PartonenTLönnqvistJ. Bright light improves vitality and alleviates distress in healthy people. Journal of Affective Disorders2000; 57: 55–61.
35.
BersonDMDunnFATakaoM. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science2002; 295: 1070–1073.
36.
al EneziJRevellVBrownTWynneJSchlangenLLucasR. A “melanopic” spectral efficiency function predicts the sensitivity of melanopsin photoreceptors to polychromatic lights. Journal of Biological Rhythms2011; 26: 314–323.
37.
BrownTAllenAEal EneziJWynneJSchlangenLHommesVLucasR. The melanopic sensitivity function accounts for melanopsin-driven responses in mice under diverse lighting conditions. PLoS One2013; 8: e53583.
38.
IzsóLLángELauferLSupliczSHorváthÁ. Psychophysiological, performance and subjective correlates of different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology2009; 41: 349–360.
39.
KüllerRWetterbergL. Melatonin, cortisol, EEG, ECG and subjective comfort in healthy humans: Impact of two fluorescent lamp types at two light intensities. Lighting Research and Technology1993; 25: 71–81.
40.
ViolaAUJamesLMSchlangenLJMDijkDJ. Blue-enriched white light in the workplace improves self-reported alertness, performance and sleep quality. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health2008; 34: 297–306.
41.
MillsPRTomkinsSCSchlangenLJM. The effect of high correlated colour temperature office lighting on employee wellbeing and work performance. Journal of Circadian Rhythms2007; 5: 2–10. .
42.
ChellappaSLSteinerRBlattnerPOelhafenPGötzTCajochenC. Non-visual effects of light on melatonin, alertness and cognitive performance: Can blue-enriched light keep us alert?PLoS One2011; 6: e16429.
43.
FigueiroMReaMSBulloughJD. Circadian effectiveness of two polychromatic lights in suppressing human nocturnal melatonin. Neuroscience Letters2006; 406: 293–297.
44.
McCollSLVeitchJA. Full-spectrum fluorescent lighting: a review of its effects on physiology and health. Psychological Medicine2001; 31: 949–964.
45.
VeitchJAMcCollSL. A critical examination of perceptual and cognitive effects attributed to full-spectrum fluorescent lighting. Ergonomics2001; 44: 255–279. .
CheungINReidKJWangCKuoNZeePBoubekriM. Impact of workplace daylight exposure on sleep, physical activity, and quality of life. Sleep2013; 36: A422.
48.
MünchMLinhartFBorisuitAJaeggiSMScartezziniJ-L. Effects of prior light exposure on early evening performance, subjective sleepiness, and hormonal secretion. Behavioral Neuroscience2012; 126: 196–203.
49.
AltherrRGayJB. A low environmental impact anidolic façade. Building and Environment2002; 37: 1409–1419.
50.
LinhartF. Energetic, visual and non-visual aspects of office lighting (PhD thesis # 4634). Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Lausanne: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 2010. .
51.
CourretG. Systèmes anidoliques d'éclairage naturel (PhD thesis # 2026). Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 1999. .
52.
BorisuitALinhartFKämpfJKScartezziniJ-LMünchM. Comparison of objective and subjective visual comfort and associations with non-visual functions in young subjects: Proceedings of CISBAT 2011: International Scientific Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2011, pp. 361–366.
53.
BorisuitA. Impact of lighting including non-image forming effects on visual comfort (PhD thesis # 6007). Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 2013. .
54.
BondALaderM. The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. British Journal of Medical Psychology1974; 47: 211–218.
55.
MonkTH. A visual analogue scale technique to measure global vigor and affect. Psychiatry Research1989; 27: 89–99.
56.
WewersMELoweNK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing and Health1990; 13: 227–236.
57.
EklundNHBoycePR. The development of a reliable, valid and simple office lighting survey. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America1996; 25: 25–40.
58.
AkashiYBoycePR. A field study of illuminance reduction. Energy and Buildings2006; 38: 588–599.
59.
Association Suisse de l'Eclairage (SLG/ASE). Eclairage intérieur par la lumière du jour. Recommandations de l'Association Suisse de l'Eclairage (SLG), Zürich: Swiss Association for Standardization (SNV), 1989. .
Curran-EverettD. Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology2000; 279: R1–R8.
62.
MarkusTA. The significance of sunshine and view for office workers. Sunlight in Building, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Boewcentrum International, 1967, pp. 59–93.
63.
WellsBWP. Subjective responses to the lighting installation in a modern office building and their design implications. Building Science1965; 1: 57–68.
64.
ChauvelPCollinsJBDogniauxRLongmoreJ. Glare from windows: Current views of the problem. Lighting Research and Technology1982; 14: 31–46.
65.
HopkinsonRG. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics1972; 3: 206–215.
66.
OsterhausWKE. Discomfort glare from daylight in computer offices: How much do we really know? Proceedings of Lux Europa 2001, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2001, pp. 448–456.
67.
TuaycharoenNTregenzaPR. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 185–200.
68.
TuaycharoenNTregenzaPR. Discomfort glare from interesting images. Lighting Research and Technology2005; 4: 329–338.
69.
RügerMGordijnMCMBeersmaDGMde VriesBDaanS. Time-of-day-dependent effects of bright light exposure on human psychophysiology: comparison of daytime and nighttime exposure. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology2006; 290: R1413–R1420.
70.
BoycePRVeitchJANewshamGRJonesCCHeerwagenJHMyerMHunterC. Lighting quality and office work: Two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research and Technology2006; 38: 191–223.
