In order to compare subjective impressions created by LED and metal halide ambient lighting, a pilot project was conducted in a Belgrade park. All general requirements for an adequate comparison of subjective impressions were fulfilled. The survey was conducted using a questionnaire related to all aspects the researchers considered relevant for subjective evaluation of illuminated pedestrian paths in parks. It was concluded that the respondents, both those who had and those who did not have previous knowledge in the field of lighting, strongly preferred the use of metal halide lamps for the illumination of parks, which is in opposition to the statements of some LED manufacturers. It was also shown that light level and feelings of safety and comfort are evaluated as most important.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KosticAMKremicMMDjokicLSKosticMB. Light-emitting diodes in street and roadway lighting – a case study involving mesopic effects. Lighting Research and Technology2013; 45: 1–10.
2.
Onaygil S, Güler Ö, Erkin E. Cost analyses of LED luminaires in road lighting: Proceedings of the 27th Session of the CIE, Sun City, South Africa: 9–16 July 2011: 723–729.
BoycePReaM. Security lighting effects of illuminance and light source on the capabilities of guards and intruders. Lighting Research and Technology1990; 22: 57–79.
8.
Royer MP, Poplawski ME, Tuenge JR. Demonstration Assessment of LED Roadway Lighting. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory report. Washington, USA, June 2012.
9.
Hagiwara T, Akasaka H, Matsuo H, Nishio M. Visibility assessment of light emitting diode (LED) street lighting: Proceedings of the 27th Session of the CIE, Sun City, South Africa: 9–16 July 2011: 1192–1200.
Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Road Lighting Calculations. CIE Publication 140–2000, Vienna: CIE, 2000.
13.
Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic. CIE Publication 115–2010, Vienna: CIE, 2010.
14.
Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Recommended System for Mesopic Photometry Based on Visual Performance. CIE Publication 191–2010. Vienna: CIE, 2010.
15.
KosticMBDjokicLS. A modified CIE mesopic table and its influence on the effectiveness of white light sources. Lighting Research and Technology2012; 44: 416–426.
16.
Boyce PR, Eklund NH. Simple tools for evaluating lighting: Proceeding of the CIBSE National Lighting Conference, London, UK: 5–8 April 1998: 255–261.
17.
Morante P. Mesopic Street Lighting Demonstration and Evaluation. Lighting Research Center report. New York, USA, January 2008.
18.
ABS Consulting. Trial of an LED Lighting Installation. ABS Consulting Report. London, UK, April 2010.
19.
Lindh UW. Lighting design research in public space: a holistic approach to a complex reality: Proceedings of the 27th Session of the CIE, Sun City, South Africa: 9–16 July 2011: 767–776.
20.
SwensonJDGriswoldWFKleiberPB. Focus groups: method of inquiry/intervention. Small Group Research1992; 23: 459–474.
