Simulation of virtual natural lighting solutions with a simplified view

Abstract

Daylight is limited in time and space. In situations where daylight is insufficiently available, virtual natural lighting solutions (VNLS), which are systems that artificially provide lighting and view comparable to those of real windows and skylights, can be promising. VNLS can turn currently unused floor space into space with daylight qualities. The space-gaining potential of VNLS in buildings can be predicted using computational building performance simulation. This paper describes the approach of modelling VNLS with a simplified view, using the Radiance tool to evaluate the lighting performance in a reference office. The VNLS are modelled as arrays of small light sources resembling the sky, the horizon and the ground. The simulation results show that VNLS with wide beam angles generally offer a better uniformity and a larger percentage of sufficiently lit workplane area compared to those obtained with real windows under overcast sky conditions, while the discomfort glare remains comparable to that received from real windows.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyce

Hunter

Howlett

. The Benefits of Daylight Through Windows, Troy, NY: Lighting Research Center, 2003.

Heschong

. Window and Offices: A Study of Office Worker Performance and the Indoor Environment. P500-03-082-A-9, Gold River, CA: Heschong Mahone Group, 2003.

Heschong

Wright

Okura

. Daylighting impacts on human performance in school. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 2002; 31: 101–114.

Tuaycharoen

Tregenza

. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology 2007; 39: 185–200.

Keighley

. Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in office buildings - A study of window shape. Building Science 1973; 8: 311–320.

Keighley

. Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in offices - A study of multiple apertures and window area. Building Science 1973; 8: 321–331.

Markus

. The function of windows - A reappraisal. Building Science 1967; 2: 97–121.

Hellinga HY, de Bruin-Hordijk GJ. A new method for the analysis of daylight access and view out: Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009 - 11th European Lighting Conference, Turkish National Committee on Illumination, Istanbul, 2009.

Kaplan

. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

10.

Tregenza

Loe

. The Design of Lighting, London: E and FN Spon, 1998.

11.

Mangkuto RA, Aries MBC, van Loenen EJ, Hensen JLM. Properties and performance indicators of virtual natural lighting solutions: Proceedings of CISBAT 2011, LESO-PB, EPFL, Lausanne, 2011.

12.

Mangkuto RA, Ochoa CE, Aries MBC, van Loenen EJ, Hensen JLM. Review of modelling approach for developing virtual natural lighting solutions: Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011, IBPSA Australasia and AIRAH, Sydney, 2011.

13.

Tuaycharoen

Tregenza

. Discomfort glare from interesting images. Lighting Research and Technology 2005; 37: 329–341.

14.

IJsselsteijn

Oosting

Vogels

de Kort

YAW

van Loenen

. A room with a cue: The efficacy of movement parallax, occlusion, and blur in creating a virtual window. PRESENCE 2008; 17: 269–282.

15.

de Vries HJA, Aarts MPJ, Knoop M, Cornelissen H. Beneficial non-visual effects of daylight, Research into the influential parameters: Proceedings of Lux Europa 2009 - 11th European Lighting Conference, Turkish National Committee on Illumination, Istanbul, 2009.

16.

Shin

Yun

Kim

. View types and luminance effects on discomfort glare assessment from windows. Energy and Buildings 2012; 46: 139–145.

17.

Lindsey

. Applied Illumination Engineering, 2nd Edition, Lilburn: The Fairmont Press, Inc., 1997.

18.

Diepens JFL, Bakker F, Zonneveldt L. Daylight Design Variations Book. 2000. TNO-TUE Centre for Building Research. Retrieved 14 August 2012, from http://sts.bwk.tue.nl/daylight/varbook/index.htm.

19.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL). Virtual Lighting Simulator. 2010. Retrieved 14 August 2012, from http://gaia.lbl.gov/vls/.

20.

van Dijk D, Platzer WJ. Reference office for thermal, solar and lighting calculations. Report no. swift-wp3-tno-dvd-030416. 2003.

21.

Wienold

Christoffersen

. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings 2006; 38: 743–757.

22.

Harrold

. IESNA Lighting Ready Reference: A Compendium of Materials from the IESNA, New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2003.

23.

Jakubiec

Reinhart

. The ‘adaptive zone' – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Research and Technology 2012; 44: 149–170.