Attention restoration theory (ART) provides fruitful concepts for the investigation of the role of lighting in psychological and attention restoration. The present field study explores the idea that different outdoor lighting qualities may affect the perceived restorativeness of the night-time environment. It studies the relationships between the four components of ART (being away, fascination, extent and compatibility) and perceived lighting attributes (brightness, distribution, glare, colour quality, feeling of safety and pleasantness). Twenty-nine participants rated three walkway lighting environments and twenty-six participants rated two walkway lighting environments in suburban neighbourhoods. Subjective assessments suggested that lighting may have both positive and negative connections with the components of ART. The possible restorative potential of lighting deserves further research attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KaplanS. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology1995; 15: 169–182.
2.
KaplanRKaplanS. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
3.
HartigTEvansGWJamnerLDDavisDSGarlingT. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology2003; 23: 109–123.
4.
UlrichRSSimonsRFLositoBDFioritoEMilesMAZelsonM. Stress recovery during the exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology1991; 11: 201–230.
5.
KaplanSBermanMG. Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science2010; 5: 43–57.
6.
HerzogTRBlackAMFountaineKAKnottsDJ. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology1997; 17: 165–170.
7.
Van den BergAKooleSLVan der WulpNY. Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related?Journal of Environmental Psychology2003; 23: 135–146.
8.
TennessenCMCimprichB. Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology1995; 15: 77–85.
9.
BertoR. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology2005; 25: 249–259.
10.
KuoFESullivanWC. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of Environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior2001; 33: 543–571.
11.
KuoFETaylorAF. A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national survey. American Journal of Public Health2004; 94: 1580–1586.
12.
NikunenHKorpelaK. The effects of scene contents and focus of light on perceived restorativeness, fear, and preference in nightscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management2012; 55: 453–468.
13.
KarmanovDHamelR. Assessing restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning2008; 86: 115–125.
KantIJBültmanUSchröerKAPBeuerskensAJHMvan AmelsvoortLGPMSwaenGMH. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine2003; 60 (Suppl. 1): i32–i39.
18.
HartigTEvansGWJamnerLDDavisDSGärlingT. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology2003; 23: 109–123.
19.
KuoFE. Coping with poverty – Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior2001; 33: 5–34.
20.
Ward ThompsonCRoeJAspinallRMitchellRClowAMillerD. More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning2012; 105: 221–229.
21.
AlfonsoMA. To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior2005; 37: 808–836.
22.
HartigTStaatsH. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology2006; 26: 215–226.
23.
Larco N, Steiner B, Stockerd J, West A. Pedestrian-friendly environments and active travel for residents of multifamily housing: The role of preferences and perceptions. Environment and Behavior; Epub ahead of print 5 March 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0013916511402061.
24.
RussellJAMehrabianA. Approach-avoidance and affiliation as functions of the emotion-eliciting quality of an environment. Environment and Behavior1978; 10: 355–387.
25.
NikunenH. Korpela K, Restorative lighting environments – Does the focus of light have an effect on restorative experience. Journal of Light and Visual Environment2009; 33: 37–45.
26.
ZubeEHViningJLawCSBechtelRS. Perceived urban residential quality. Environment and Behavior1985; 17: 327–350.
27.
LaumannKGärlingTStormarkKM. Rating scale measures of restorative components of environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology2001; 21: 31–44.
28.
KobayashiHSatoM. Physiological responses to illuminance and color temperature of lighting. Annals of Physiological Anthropology1992; 11: 45–49.
29.
ManavB. An experimental study on the appraisal of the visual environment at offices in relation to colour temperature and illuminance. Building and Environment2007; 42: 979–983.
30.
HerzogTR. Rector AE, Perceived danger and judged likelihood of restoration. Environment and Behavior2009; 41: 387–401.
31.
UlrichRS. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning1986; 13: 29–44.
32.
BoycePREklundNHHamiltonBJBrunoLD. Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research and Technology2000; 32: 79–91.
33.
HanuyK. Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology1997; 17: 301–215.
Finnish Standards Associations. SFS-EN 13201-3 + AC. European Standard EN 13201-3:2003 Road lighting. Part 3: Calculation of Performance and it’s Corrigendum AC:2007. Helsinki: Finnish Standards Associations, 2004.
36.
HartigTKorpelaKEvansGWGärlingT. A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research1997; 14: 175–194.
37.
KorpelaMKHartigT. Restorative qualities of favourite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology1996; 12: 249–258.
38.
ChangC-YHammitWEChenP-KMachnikLSuW-C. Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning2008; 85: 79–84.
39.
HartigTMangMEvansGW. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior1991; 23: 3–23.
40.
KaplanS. Meditation, restoration and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior2001; 33: 480–506.
41.
BertoR. Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. International Journal of Psychology2007; 42: 331–341.
42.
HerzogTRMaguireCPNebelMB. Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology2003; 23: 159–170.
43.
BaronRBReaMSDanielsSG. Effects of indoor lighting (illuminance and spectral distribution) on the performance of cognitive tasks and interpersonal behaviors: The potential mediating role of positive affect. Motivation and Emotion1992; 16: 1–33.
44.
KnezI. Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology1994; 15: 39–51.
45.
FisherBSNasarJL. Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape. Environment and Behavior1991; 24: 35–65.
46.
HaansAde KortYAW. Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, concealment, and escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology2012; 32: 342–352.
47.
NasarJLFisherBGrannisM. Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning1993; 26: 161–178.
48.
NasarJLJonesKM. Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior1997; 29: 291–323.
49.
StampsAE. Enclosure and safety in urbanscapes. Environment and Behavior2005; 37: 102–133.
50.
MiwaYHanuyK. The effects of interior design on communication and impressions of a counsellor in a counseling room. Environment and Behavior2006; 38: 484–502.
51.
FotiosSAChealC. Lighting for subsidiary streets: Investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2 – Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology2007; 39: 233–253.
