Blind systems have been introduced to provide visual and thermal comfort, as well as to reduce energy use in buildings. A wide variety of such systems exist in terms of thermal and optical properties, location and physical configuration. The current problem with blinds is that their operation is not based on the dynamics of the room but on the static or manual control operated by occupants, although many studies have recognized that dynamic control can far outperform static control. One reason for the lack of dynamic control is that it is not easy to combine the room dynamics with any possible optimization algorithm. Hence, in this study, a whole building simulation tool, EnergyPlus, was integrated with the MATLAB optimization toolbox to solve for optimal control of blind systems. This paper addresses the difference between static versus optimal control of interior and exterior blind systems in office buildings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChoSHShinKSZaheer-UddinM. The effect of slat angle of window with venetian blinds on heating and cooling loads of buildings in South Korea. Energy1995; 20: 1225–1236.
2.
Hayashi T, Katayama T, Sugai T, Watanabe T. On thermal performance of the exterior envelopes of buildings IV: Proceeding of the ASHRAE/DOE Conference: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers and U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada, Las Vegas, Dec 6–9, 1989: 405–413.
3.
NewshamGR. Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: implications for comfort and energy consumption. Indoor Environment1994; 3: 135–144.
4.
LeeESDiBartolomeoDLSelkowitzSE. Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office. Energy and Buildings1998; 29: 47–63.
5.
BauerMGeigingerJHegetschweilerWMorelNWurmsdoblerP. Delta: A Blind Controller Using Fuzzy Logic, Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne: Lausanne: EPFL, 1996.
6.
KurianCPAithanRSBhatJGeorgeVI. Robust control and optimisation of energy consumption in daylight-artificial light integrated schemes. Lighting Research and Technology2008; 40: 7–24.
7.
ASHRAE. ASHRAE Handbook – Fundamentals, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2009.
8.
Korea Institute of Energy Research. A Study on the Typical Energy Consumption Criteria in Building, Seoul: Korean Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, 1999. (in Korean).
9.
ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA. ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2004.
10.
KEMC. Energy Design Guide for Buildings, Seoul: Korea Energy Management Corporation, 2008. (in Korean).
11.
GowriKWiniarskiDJarnaginR. Infiltration Modeling Guidelines for Commercial Building Energy Analysis, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report - 18898. Richland, OR: PNNL, 2006.
12.
EmmerichSJMcDowellTAnisW. Investigation of the Impact of Commercial Building Envelope Airtightness on HVAC Energy Use, National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report 7238. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST, 2005.
13.
IESNA. IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th Edition, New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2000.
14.
DOE. EnergyPlusV2.2 Input/Output Reference: The Encyclopaedic Reference to EnergyPlus Input and Output, Washington, DC: US Department Of Energy, 2008.
15.
WinkelmannFCSelkowitzS. Daylighting simulation in the DOE-2 building energy analysis program. Energy and Buildings1985; 8: 271–286.
16.
Hitchcok RJ, Carroll WL. DElight: a daylighting and electric lighting simulation engine: Proceedings of the 8th IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands: International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2003.
17.
DOE. EnergyPlusV2.2 Engineering Reference: The Encyclopaedic Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations, Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, 2008.
18.
ColemanTFLiY. On the convergence of interior-reflective Newton method for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Mathematical Programming1994; 67: 189–224.
19.
HopkinsonRG. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics1972; 3: 206–215.
20.
VineELeeEClearRDiBartolomeoDSelkowitzS. Office worker response to an automated venetian blind and electric lighting system: a pilot study. Energy and Buildings1998; 28: 205–218.
21.
Reinhart CF. Daylighting availability and manual lighting control in office buildings-simulation studies and analysis of measurement. PhD thesis. Karlsruhe, Germany: Technical University of Karlsruhe, 2001.
22.
ReinhartCF. Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy2004; 77: 15–28.
23.
FangXD. A study on the U-factor of the window with a high reflectivity venetian blind. Solar Energy2000; 68: 207–214.
24.
ShahidHNaylorD. Energy performance assessment of a window with a horizontal venetian blind. Energy and Building2005; 37: 836–843.
